Topic: Nexus - Pure SHA3 + CPU/GPU + nPoS + 15 Active Innovations + More to Come - page 194. (Read 785514 times)
September 29, 2015, 11:46:19 PM
That link is to source code not overly useful unless he can compile it.
September 29, 2015, 11:35:10 PM
I'm sorry what? What do you mean by that?
Use this miner 
September 29, 2015, 06:02:50 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Stellar is a Ripple Fork. Code can be forked and modified and new ideas tried and tested, some will last, some won't. Litecoin was based on Tenebrix/Fairbrix and became something better.
I love open source myself, although I think Viz is very trustworthy and this is his project and he put in all the time.
September 29, 2015, 05:44:40 PM
So aaannnnnyyy way...
I'm seriously questioning if my gtx 780ti is actually pulling ~60MH/s
I solved a number of blocks at 16MH/s with my r9 270oc yet I've picked up zippo on the 780ti.
Even taking the fluctuating difficulty into account, I should have gotten something by now.
Has anyone else had experience on windows with the CUDA miner?
I'm seriously questioning if my gtx 780ti is actually pulling ~60MH/s
I solved a number of blocks at 16MH/s with my r9 270oc yet I've picked up zippo on the 780ti.
Even taking the fluctuating difficulty into account, I should have gotten something by now.
Has anyone else had experience on windows with the CUDA miner?
Keep using a miner that doesn't even support this coin, well done, keep at it.
I'm sorry what? What do you mean by that?
September 29, 2015, 05:22:18 PM
So aaannnnnyyy way...
I'm seriously questioning if my gtx 780ti is actually pulling ~60MH/s
I solved a number of blocks at 16MH/s with my r9 270oc yet I've picked up zippo on the 780ti.
Even taking the fluctuating difficulty into account, I should have gotten something by now.
Has anyone else had experience on windows with the CUDA miner?
I'm seriously questioning if my gtx 780ti is actually pulling ~60MH/s
I solved a number of blocks at 16MH/s with my r9 270oc yet I've picked up zippo on the 780ti.
Even taking the fluctuating difficulty into account, I should have gotten something by now.
Has anyone else had experience on windows with the CUDA miner?
Keep using a miner that doesn't even support this coin, well done, keep at it.
September 29, 2015, 12:55:06 PM
It does not matter at all if coin is closed source or open source.
It has no influence on coins success or failure at all.
Decentralized and opensource are just words.
I totally agree! So stop whining ✌️🙏🏽 It has no influence on coins success or failure at all.
Decentralized and opensource are just words.
September 29, 2015, 10:22:28 AM
It does not matter at all if coin is closed source or open source.
It has no influence on coins success or failure at all.
Decentralized and opensource are just words.
It has no influence on coins success or failure at all.
Decentralized and opensource are just words.
September 28, 2015, 11:41:44 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
You are certainly free to have that opinion about open versus closed source and the debate is welcome. However, for you to attack Viz and call him corrupt is really uncalled for and quite ridiculous. It sounds self-serving to me as though you have a hidden agenda.
I'm pretty sure he would agree with me that he has been corrupted long ago by his own desires to control the direction of the project and the codebase. This project was going to be open-sourced at 1.0.3, but the can continues to get kicked down the road. It wasn't until I read that he is looking to patent the codebase that I realized this project will never be a community project whatsoever.
Viz can literally fork the blockchain at any moment since everyone is running his binaries and/or give himself as many coins as he wants by a simple line of code in the source that nobody knows about.
Oh, but Niro supposedly fixes all of Bitcoin's problems -- including that silly blockchain trust and open-source problem.
Well considering he started the platform, I suppose he can do what he feels necessary to bring his vision to fruition. Sure, I understand the risks of closed source and your concerns, but I'm not concerned here at all. I see many good reasons to patent certain aspects of blockchain technology. I guarantee that IBM will be patenting its platform. Why hand them and others like them the keys to the kingdom?
Yes, he can do whatever he wants but that doesn't mean being a cheerleader and following blindly without criticizing him is good for the project. In fact, criticism and disagreements about the direction of projects is essential to success. Many corporations and centralized structures become inefficient and uncompetitive because they disregard the criticisms of their supporters and employees.
Calling people out when they renege on their multiple promises to open-source is important and I think Viz would agree with me here that he has been disorganized and likely working inefficiently due to the centralized control of Coinshield/Nexus.
Never said it was a bad thing. In fact I said the debate was welcome. It was your use of the word "corrupt" to describe Viz that I disagree with. That's a personal attack. Not a debate.
Maybe "corrupt" isn't a fair characterization, disingenuous is better I suppose.
September 28, 2015, 11:33:32 PM
So aaannnnnyyy way...
I'm seriously questioning if my gtx 780ti is actually pulling ~60MH/s
I solved a number of blocks at 16MH/s with my r9 270oc yet I've picked up zippo on the 780ti.
Even taking the fluctuating difficulty into account, I should have gotten something by now.
Has anyone else had experience on windows with the CUDA miner?
I'm seriously questioning if my gtx 780ti is actually pulling ~60MH/s
I solved a number of blocks at 16MH/s with my r9 270oc yet I've picked up zippo on the 780ti.
Even taking the fluctuating difficulty into account, I should have gotten something by now.
Has anyone else had experience on windows with the CUDA miner?
September 28, 2015, 11:30:30 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
You are certainly free to have that opinion about open versus closed source and the debate is welcome. However, for you to attack Viz and call him corrupt is really uncalled for and quite ridiculous. It sounds self-serving to me as though you have a hidden agenda.
I'm pretty sure he would agree with me that he has been corrupted long ago by his own desires to control the direction of the project and the codebase. This project was going to be open-sourced at 1.0.3, but the can continues to get kicked down the road. It wasn't until I read that he is looking to patent the codebase that I realized this project will never be a community project whatsoever.
Viz can literally fork the blockchain at any moment since everyone is running his binaries and/or give himself as many coins as he wants by a simple line of code in the source that nobody knows about.
Oh, but Niro supposedly fixes all of Bitcoin's problems -- including that silly blockchain trust and open-source problem.
Well considering he started the platform, I suppose he can do what he feels necessary to bring his vision to fruition. Sure, I understand the risks of closed source and your concerns, but I'm not concerned here at all. I see many good reasons to patent certain aspects of blockchain technology. I guarantee that IBM will be patenting its platform. Why hand them and others like them the keys to the kingdom?
Yes, he can do whatever he wants but that doesn't mean being a cheerleader and following blindly without criticizing him is good for the project. In fact, criticism and disagreements about the direction of projects is essential to success. Many corporations and centralized structures become inefficient and uncompetitive because they disregard the criticisms of their supporters and employees.
Calling people out when they renege on their multiple promises to open-source is important and I think Viz would agree with me here that he has been disorganized and likely working inefficiently due to the centralized control of Coinshield/Nexus.
Never said it was a bad thing. In fact I said the debate was welcome. It was your use of the word "corrupt" to describe Viz that I disagree with. That's a personal attack. Not a debate.
September 28, 2015, 11:20:22 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
You are certainly free to have that opinion about open versus closed source and the debate is welcome. However, for you to attack Viz and call him corrupt is really uncalled for and quite ridiculous. It sounds self-serving to me as though you have a hidden agenda.
I'm pretty sure he would agree with me that he has been corrupted long ago by his own desires to control the direction of the project and the codebase. This project was going to be open-sourced at 1.0.3, but the can continues to get kicked down the road. It wasn't until I read that he is looking to patent the codebase that I realized this project will never be a community project whatsoever.
Viz can literally fork the blockchain at any moment since everyone is running his binaries and/or give himself as many coins as he wants by a simple line of code in the source that nobody knows about.
Oh, but Niro supposedly fixes all of Bitcoin's problems -- including that silly blockchain trust and open-source problem.
Well considering he started the platform, I suppose he can do what he feels necessary to bring his vision to fruition. Sure, I understand the risks of closed source and your concerns, but I'm not concerned here at all. I see many good reasons to patent certain aspects of blockchain technology. I guarantee that IBM will be patenting its platform. Why hand them and others like them the keys to the kingdom?
Yes, he can do whatever he wants but that doesn't mean being a cheerleader and following blindly without criticizing him is good for the project. In fact, criticism and disagreements about the direction of projects is essential to success. Many corporations and centralized structures become inefficient and uncompetitive because they disregard the criticisms of their supporters and employees.
Calling people out when they renege on their multiple promises to open-source is important and I think Viz would agree with me here that he has been disorganized and likely working inefficiently due to the centralized control of Coinshield/Nexus.
September 28, 2015, 11:10:24 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
You are certainly free to have that opinion about open versus closed source and the debate is welcome. However, for you to attack Viz and call him corrupt is really uncalled for and quite ridiculous. It sounds self-serving to me as though you have a hidden agenda.
I'm pretty sure he would agree with me that he has been corrupted long ago by his own desires to control the direction of the project and the codebase. This project was going to be open-sourced at 1.0.3, but the can continues to get kicked down the road. It wasn't until I read that he is looking to patent the codebase that I realized this project will never be a community project whatsoever.
Viz can literally fork the blockchain at any moment since everyone is running his binaries and/or give himself as many coins as he wants by a simple line of code in the source that nobody knows about.
Oh, but Niro supposedly fixes all of Bitcoin's problems -- including that silly blockchain trust and open-source problem.
Well considering he started the platform, I suppose he can do what he feels necessary to bring his vision to fruition. Sure, I understand the risks of closed source and your concerns, but I'm not concerned here at all. I see many good reasons to patent certain aspects of blockchain technology. I guarantee that IBM will be patenting its platform. Why hand them and others like them the keys to the kingdom?
September 28, 2015, 10:44:52 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
You are certainly free to have that opinion about open versus closed source and the debate is welcome. However, for you to attack Viz and call him corrupt is really uncalled for and quite ridiculous. It sounds self-serving to me as though you have a hidden agenda.
I'm pretty sure he would agree with me that he has been corrupted long ago by his own desires to control the direction of the project and the codebase. This project was going to be open-sourced at 1.0.3, but the can continues to get kicked down the road. It wasn't until I read that he is looking to patent the codebase that I realized this project will never be a community project whatsoever.
Viz can literally fork the blockchain at any moment since everyone is running his binaries and/or give himself as many coins as he wants by a simple line of code in the source that nobody knows about.
Oh, but Niro supposedly fixes all of Bitcoin's problems -- including that silly blockchain trust and open-source problem.
September 28, 2015, 10:13:07 PM
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
That is completely understandable. There's a 1000 something projects out there that are open source. Maybe your efforts might be better spent elsewhere I suppose. I heard Bitcoin is doing well for itself at the moment.
September 28, 2015, 10:11:32 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
You are certainly free to have that opinion about open versus closed source and the debate is welcome. However, for you to attack Viz and call him corrupt is really uncalled for and quite ridiculous. It sounds self-serving to me as though you have a hidden agenda.
September 28, 2015, 09:49:15 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
Satoshi open-sourced Bitcoin 8 days after the genesis block was created. Open-sourcing the code is as simple as uploading the code to Github.
I don't see your point because you are trying to divert the discussion from being about open-source to putting Viz on a pedestal. Viz is not a God he is just a human being that has become corrupted by his own desire to control a project that most of the original community have left due to the centralized control of the project. Now he is talking about patenting the code-base. That is antithetical to open-source.
I for one will not contribute anything to this project until the code is open-sourced so I can see if it is malicious or not, or full of bugs. I will not take anyone else's word for it - that's the whole point of this revolution, we don't need to trust or have faith in anyone because the code is there for us to see.
September 28, 2015, 09:35:35 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
Why don't you try writing/creating something equivalent or better to Niro, spend a year on it, and launch everything in one day.
Not really the best move.
September 28, 2015, 09:31:42 PM
Say what you like but we are all aware of the status quo for open/closed source projects in the crypto sphere.
Please don't think I'm been rude but if you don't like Nexus Niro, find another project that suits your ethics.
Please don't think I'm been rude but if you don't like Nexus Niro, find another project that suits your ethics.
September 28, 2015, 09:07:12 PM
...by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
This will be the excuse for years to come. In case you haven't noticed, people are forking Ethereum and soon Ripple. People are trying different parameters. Do you know what the reality is? Those scam clones lose steam after about 30 days. Buy support disappears. They can't maintain the veneer of community or the lies of "development".
It is ironic that this community is afraid of the one thing that would set this project free.
Don't sit here and try to defend closed-source code for a public blockchain anymore, it's bullshit and you all know it.
September 28, 2015, 08:56:49 PM
I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. Normally I wouldn't touch closed source with a 10 foot³ Faraday cage but in this case, some things are worth keeping a secret. He has a very specific goal in mind here and by open sourcing the project before its completion would open the doors to a million scam clones.
I predicted the birth of Corp Coins back in 2013, well before the likes of Paycoin etc.
Nexus Niro Is not quite a Corp Coin in the classic sense and I think, provided he stays true to his word in regards to opening the source upon completion of the basic features planned, the Nexus network will be something that will take on a life of its own, without hindrance.
I predicted the birth of Corp Coins back in 2013, well before the likes of Paycoin etc.
Nexus Niro Is not quite a Corp Coin in the classic sense and I think, provided he stays true to his word in regards to opening the source upon completion of the basic features planned, the Nexus network will be something that will take on a life of its own, without hindrance.
Jump to: