Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.
There is no problem with sites that enforce KYC, at all levels, as long as they indicate the necessity of doing so on the terms of use page. The user agrees to these terms during registration for the first time.
The problem is with sites that claim that they do not enforce KYC or that they only enforce KYC level 0, and then after a while they start imposing KYC procedures. It is sufficient for it to amend the “Terms of Use” without taking into account the options of users who agreed to certain conditions for the first time. The least that can be done is to notify users sufficiently in advance before making the modification.
Some common mistakes always comes from the gambler side, if you're using a casino that supports kyc and they did not request for such when you first started doesn't mean they are not going to do so later, they are only being patient to see you enjoy their website use for a while before you make any requests from them to perform certain functions then they subject you to their initial KYC, which i don't see anything bad or new here, if you being a gambler that does not want KYC then you should go for a casino that does not support for KYC right from the start.
The most commonly made mistakes by gamblers is in the area of not reading of the terms and conditions of the casino before depositing and playing onnthose sites, there is no other way to know what await you from your engagement with a casino unless you read the T&C.
A few of the complains that jave been recorded, were all based on the fault of rhe gambler not reading and complying with the site demands.
I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.
Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.
