Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 10. (Read 4171 times)

First thing first; I call bullshit on the AI thing, OP has already declared that "the KYC levels are determined together with the casino." Of course it also means a reviewed casino can ask him to rate it as 0 KYC if they are "compelling" enough

On the other hand, according to the site's KYC level explanation some of the reviewed casinos, like Betplay or JackBit should be awarded a KYC level of 1 or 2 rather than 0, as you can see in this image



Anyway, the idea is great, just by looking at this thread we can see the demand a service like kycnot.me focused in gambling sites and related services will meet, too bad the execution was so poor.

Maybe the community can do better (and yes, we totally should try)

Are these listed crypto casinos and websites a safe one though? Because a lot of scam casinos are not also offering KYC but at the end, they hold the funds of the people that are playing in their casinos and claim that they did not comply with KYC or that they found the withdrawal suspicious so I have to ask that one, I hope you don't mind OP.

while you claim to be a NO KYC site , yet it is clear in your  thread that there is still a chance of you to seek for KYC though it is considered a LOW or NO , is this how you wanna trap your players?
when you say NO KYC you must be clear about No at all and not that you will hide for some small Word that can bring conflict once there is something you wanted to hold from their accounts and funds.

And by the way, there is good reason to worry, I think so. 
First of all, you don’t know in advance how confidential personal information about you will remain in casino client databases.  But these bath databases can be stolen or hacked by hackers.  And information about you, including information about where you are physically located, becomes practically public.  I see a great danger in this.  And perhaps players should not immediately send photos or scans of their documents wherever KYC is mentioned.  And it’s not for nothing that the market for rendering fake documents in the form of files for KYC has become quite developed.  Many players still want to play in different ways without problems and remain anonymous.

 I'm not even talking about countries where gambling is generally punishable by the laws of these countries.  There, the issue of anonymity is generally extremely important.

That's right, there are different levels of KYC requirements and it also depends on the kind of casino or gambling platform involved, we must make sure to know the way each gambling casinos operate and what they request from their gamblers, by now i don't expect that we often have challenges in giving KYC information requirements since we are the ones in charge of what we need the KYC for, it's our account and the informations needed are also coming from us, this should be the simplest to do but many worries alot whenever it's all about KYC.

When we generally evaluate issues such as the KYC requirement, it would be worth considering that the identity verification itself under the KYC procedure differs quite significantly in terms of the set of requirements for providing photographs of documents or a person.  Or sometimes photographs with a document at the same time.  Sometimes you may be asked to send a video image as well. 
This is usually called strict KYC or KYC by simplest procedure. 
And there are situations when it is important for a player to know whether or not the casino will impose a requirement on him to undergo strict KYC.  Or you can play after going through KYC according to a simplified procedure and not worry about the money on your deposit and the possibility of withdrawing the money you win to your account.  But such data is quite difficult to collect and, moreover, the casino may change it from time to time.  So, in the end, the list of casinos without KYC, or with simplified KYC, or, finally, strict KYC must be updated quite often.  Simply also because the number of casinos with KYC is constantly increasing, and vice versa, the number of casinos without KYC is constantly decreasing.
 Its just that they are all afraid of regulators and comply with requirements that practically destroy the anonymity of players.  This is sad.

Hey there- I tried your Request Listing on your list but it's throwing an AJAX error when trying to submit.
Anyway, I would like to get l0tt0.com listed on your site. It would be a Level 0 on your scale.

Thanks so much

Josh

We almost know what we want, even though there are many offers from people concerning their no KYC casino list, we can use our own personal abilities to descern them from which are not, gambling is made easy now because you can always make you of the opportunity to search for your desired casino from the list of the available ones and check through their various requirements concerning KYC, if you're ok with them, then you can proceed, if you aren't, then you can continue your search.

Though I am not a serious gambler but in few cases I can visit the site to have fun some and left. No casino is meant it in that way in the recent time. Almost all the casinos in the present days ask for KYC from one way or another either directly or indirectly. I don't normally believed those casinos that say, they are not offering KYC because at the end when a gambler win big and wants to withdraw then drama upon drama will display. Normally if a casino is offering a KYC then they should not asked for even an email for the registration because the email address is part of the KYC. Any casino that is asking for the full name of the play has already bridge the no KYC policy.

I see BCGame in your list of casinos on the website. They DO require KYC and I was forced to submit as the funds were kept hostage until I provided it so not sure how you call them a NO-KYC casino.

I truly appreciate your effort to find such casinos because I do like to gamble anonymously but man it's really hard to find such casinos these days, so your efforts deserve much appreciations. Most of the casinos listed are new or I never heard about them, so "NO-KYC" perhaps comes at an added risk of losing your bankroll to a well planned scam. Still, it must be a good initiative and I will bookmark your site .

That's what I think, there are many casinos that I have never seen in my life , and they don't seem trustworthy to me, I don't know how they managed to extract those casinos or what their intentions are, but it caught my attention because a casino that doesn't require KYC is something interesting, and what I imagine is that for there to be one like this there must have quite a few things to do, such as the lack of licenses and this causes a lot of distrust in the players, I think that those new casinos that come out will be without KYC and those that can monopolize attention and clients and be honest, I don't know how they can do it, but it is possible.

Casinos that are decentralized do not seem good to me, they are different in everything, in how they are managed and the internal environment, and the problem with decentralized casinos is the support, yes it is a problem with centralized casinos, because they use AI a lot, A decentralized channel could be more problematic, but that's the way I would trust them is if they were here on the forum with a thread Ann and with the positive comments from the ommunity.

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

Well I have always thought that all of us as Players Always Want to be good in Some way that is Not or that involves leaving the KYC because basically the casinos with KYC are very annoying when it comes to them, not only Because of that but also because the eoprsoans do not You like to leave your data there, it is something that can be annoying and dangerous at the same time, although the most trusted part of the forum is where I have risked Leaving my KYC, but it is only because they are casinos that have a very good Reputation and therefore That is that I have left my KYC , of course it is my personal decision, I do not urge andie to follow what I do, I only stop leaving what I have done as if it is possible to Trust , as long as taking into Consideration that things They can change a lot, with respect to casinos they Can be Hacked or violated, but what is important is That they know how to take care of themselves , Defend themselves without Compromising our Data Or compromising our Balance. thus, that is where You see how efficient a casino can be.

When trying to do Different things in a Casino One can Consider that if You Want to have casino without KYC it is a total challenge, there are none, the casino that was most established Without KYC was freebitco.in but at some point things can be Different because they already have KYC requirements, and that is Something that disappointed Many , but Considering that it is a CasinCo, a site so reliable and so many Years old , since it is considered leaving the KYC without any problem, the biggest problem is when there is a There is a Relatively new casino and Leaving the KYC there is something that can be very Dangerous, because they are new casinos, we do not know how they come, if they are honest , trustworthy , that is What I have seen that can be Done, of course because the New is always be Careful, not all Casinos are bad , nor do they Intend to scam, but it is good to always be alert and Distrustful, so in this other way of teaching it is What they say that you Should be very Careful.

Yes these are the tricks of some casinos out here which they are advertising that they don't have any KYC in thier casino and once a gambler fall in To that trap and play in thier game then after a few play and want to withdraw thier winning profits then they will ask for KYC which pretty bad cause in thier advertisement they don't ask KYC, anyways there are some casino who are trusted enough and the you can play and withdraw without a problem but once your account being suspected then for sure your withdrawal will be on hold.

some promises to have NO KYC but if you go deeper it is also written that "If they found your activities suspicious" then they have the rights to ask for KYC lol.

also correct that those no kyc site are getting lower nowadays because some casino that I use to play that does not ask for KYC in the beginning (Like Roobet and Duelbits in the past) but now they need to comply with government regulation and that is to prevent accounts from Money Laundering so need a account verification.

Lately, the same thought keeps coming to me: all cryptocurrency lovers are becoming more and more accustomed to constantlyi undergoing KYC checks and do not really think about the fact that their personal data has long been known in casinos and banks and in authorized  control of the income and finances of citizens by government agencies and, in general, due to the constant theft of databases of personal information from unreliable sites, for example some crypto-casinos, all this data practically ends up in the public domain on the Internet. 
So it’s obvious that this is bad.  And it turns out that by prohibiting the use of a casino by a completely anonymous player, who under no circumstances will disclose his personal data to the casino, violates the fundamental principle of competitive trade in services - the principle of the best satisfaction of the player as a consumer of the services of this casino.  And in this sense, there is a clear violation of consumer rights.  Still, I believe that something needs to be done with the process of widespread and mandatory introduction of KYC and really defend an autonomous group of crypto casinos that are guaranteed not to require KYC from players under any circumstances.  This, of course, is almost impossible now due to the requirements of various regulators, but it is extremely important from the point of view of eliminating an obvious violation of consumer rights. 
I hope that with the passage of time and the further development of the crypto casino sector, based on the interests of anonymous players, this issue will finally be resolved.

Get free best casino bonuses by clicking on the shaking giftbox

There have been alot on gamblers mind concerning the KYC challenges they face in using a casino, despite this they cannot hold their peace without using them because they get some of the things they wanted from using them, truly said that there are no KYC casino and this categories are also another different ones that they will have to research about them and know how reputable they are before using them, I will just advise here that we shouldn't start what we may be unable to complete when choosing between a KYC gambling platform and a casino that does not require KYC.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.