Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 10. (Read 3246 times)

I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.

Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.

We know that crypto people would really be always prefer on having that no kyc platform but since this platforms or business does involved huge money then expect that regulations would really be next in line.
Also there are really people who do really mind about having license because they do really see it as a proof about sites legitimacy which we know that it is a common approach but we know that licenses cant really assure out 100% security if funds are really that taken or been ran away specially here on crypto space but somehow it does have a better security compared into those who do ran off a fully anonymous platform which it does really have its cons when it comes to users funds been stored up on the said platform . This is why some people would really be preferring about being regulated or centralized rather than being not.
Making out with those false claims specially on start up is really not something that good because once people or the community would really be having that kind of impression that been mold up
then sooner or later your platform or company would really be leaving no people been playing around because of the thing you had done earlier. When trust been broken then its not
something that could be taken it back.

A few months back, a casino that was also available on this forum was actually having a clear statement on their homepage that they don't require KYC from cryptocurrency gamblers, but then users were complaining that they are asking for KYC verification at the time of withdrawal which caused a lot of backlash at the casino and they basically deserved it because if they had that statement for the public to see, they should have stood by it practically.

So, it's true that if a platform makes an announcement that they are a no-KYC casino, they need to keep their promise and don't ask anyone for KYC no matter how small or large their deposits and withdrawals are because it is no excuse to ask for KYC for large withdrawals and then say you are a no-KYC casino.

They made their name as No KYC casino so people could assume that this will never be ask at any cost since that's what they market to us here. It would be crazy if later on they ask this since for this since maybe many would feel that they are been deceive since asking this when withdrawal request happen is somehow can be consider as shady action done by them or other casino. KYC is controversial topic and there are some new casino owners take advantage on situation and we know how it end up from some people believe on the words they say.  Maybe for new casino they should be honest regarding on KYC since at current situation where regulation implemented on some casinos for sure this will be ask especially if they ask to get some licenses to make their casino legitimate to people looking at it and also to government regulating some financial platforms.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

Yes, the fact that we are in the crypto world means that most of us are probably avoiding KYC requirements. Otherwise, we would just choose a fiat casino, as they undoubtedly offer as many games as crypto casinos, if not more. However, with increasing government intervention, we can't avoid KYC requirements from becoming more common. Even playing on a non-KYC casino carries some risk. To minimize this risk, it's crucial to manage your exposure wisely. Don't become overconfident and risk a significant amount of money—only risk what you can afford to lose in case a casino turns out to be fraudulent. I'm not saying that NO KYC casinos are all untrustworthy, but it's essential to understand the difference in risk levels between non-KYC and KYC casinos.

More excited with new gambling platform without KYC for gambler actually when having new gambling platform launching, I think less attraction with new gambling platform first launching KYC (Know Your Customer) is basic requirement. Easily deposit and withdrawing without KYC not take time for gambler have submit document ID for participating in gambling platform make them looking for reputable gambling platform aren't required with KYC.

Have been pattern of gambling platform activities, how much your loss reached above ten thousand dollar is not important and account still secure but difference when your withdrawing suddenly above $1k have to prepare document for passing KYC although with that gambling platform not required with KYC.

That's the scenario you will experience if you are gambling in a casino that isn't reputable. KYC (Know Your Customer) is supposed to be just a basic requirement; if a casino chooses to implement it, they should do it correctly from the very beginning. That's why some gamblers have trust issues with casinos because casinos themselves are violating the mandates from their regulators by failing to implement KYC right away, as they want to attract gamblers to sign up on the site.

It wouldn't be attractive if casinos required KYC right away, would it?

Usually, the casinos, especially the new ones will try to implement such promotions whereby they can gather more customer's and No KYC is one card that get most attraction.
When you tell someone that you can gamble without KYC, he / she will get immediately attracted to it.  That is why we find new casino having this "No KYC" label.

However, it is seem often that as long as you are depositing, playing and losing at these casino, you are good to go but if you win anything big and try to withdraw, then suddenly all the legalizations and complications come into play and you will find your account freeze or close. That is a reason No KYC casino are mostly risky to play.

I think that potentially, businessmen who organize a casino and the operation of this casino in practice always know very well that they will definitely carry out identity verification checks according to the KYC procedure.  And in order to preserve their business, they will also be required to constantly monitor the flow of cryptocurrency by introducing mandatory verification using AML. 
however, such casino managers often instruct marketing services not to indicate too clearly and openly that the player will have to undergo KYC, and even more so if he wins.  This question can be formulated and stated in such a way, for example, even in the ToS, that the player will think that he can safely play in this casino and no one will   want to know his identity and he will calmly receive his winnings without any KYC.  And of course, advertising such as the absence of KYC works great and the number of players in such a casino is growing.  But at some moment, completely unexpected for you, the support of such a casino will inform you that they are forced to carry out KYC right now, because this is a legal requirement.  But supposedly just yesterday it was possible without KYC.  This is of course an outright lie. 
So you should always take into account that when playing in a casino, if you win, you will still have to provide your verification data.

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Yeah there are different bonuses. Exclusive Free spins and deposit bonuses

Some more information should be added that in which category each casino fits into. Some allow their own created virtual games, some provide sportsbets, some are only for casino games (real and virtual), while there are some that only allow few selected games.


The giftbox is a great way to advertise and increase your followers for your social media, a nice concept truly. Is it only free spins that we get through giftbox spins? Or are there some other surprises too?

A new casino and exclusive bonus was added

Many of you haven't taken our exclusive bonuses yet. Click on the shaking giftbox and get them

The most commonly made mistakes by gamblers is in the area of not reading of the terms and conditions of the casino before depositing and playing onnthose sites, there is no other way to know what await you from your engagement with a casino unless you read the T&C.


A few of the complains that jave been recorded, were all based on the fault of rhe gambler not reading and complying with the site demands.

Some common mistakes always comes from the gambler side, if you're using a casino that supports kyc and they did not request for such when you first started doesn't mean they are not going to do so later, they are only being patient to see you enjoy their website use for a while before you make any requests from them to perform certain functions then they subject you to their initial KYC, which i don't see anything bad or new here, if you being a gambler that does not want KYC then you should go for a casino that does not support for KYC right from the start.

There is no problem with sites that enforce KYC, at all levels, as long as they indicate the necessity of doing so on the terms of use page. The user agrees to these terms during registration for the first time.
The problem is with sites that claim that they do not enforce KYC or that they only enforce KYC level 0, and then after a while they start imposing KYC procedures. It is sufficient for it to amend the “Terms of Use” without taking into account the options of users who agreed to certain conditions for the first time. The least that can be done is to notify users sufficiently in advance before making the modification.

The primary responsibility of every gambler is to first of all check and read through the casinos terms and conditions, checking to see if the term go in line with their desire and what they can afford to bear, more also most casinos that attract customers always have a system that is highly flexible on the customers and can allow them to deposits and withdraws without KYC demands.
Where KYC is only demanded when a gambler wants to make a withdrawal above the minimum amount set by the casino for unverified accounts, At that point the customer may be asked to go through KYC, another time KYC can also be demanded is when your account is suspected to have exhibited suspension activities kyc can also be demanded that.

Personally, I have no problem with casinos or any other services that enforce kyc, be it level 1 or complete verification, as long as they are being transparent and don't try to hide it. What am against is those who claim they don't require it but will ask you to verify your identity and freeze your account as soon as you make a big win or try to cash out.
If you are not going to comply with the Curaçao license terms then why having it in first place!