Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 16. (Read 4296 times)

Is like the ops have forgotten the fact that this a discussion forum and members here take every detail seriously As of the time of writing this reply this casino is a KYC casino and just like every other KYC casino, you may be asked for your details at any point the team deem it fit to do so and at such one need to get the clear picture.
Thank goodness members of the forum have raised this question as regards the choice of name by this casino, Choosing nokyc as a domain name, and not being free kyc is something that will always spark up reactions.

Don't you think that it is risky to play on a non-KYC unknown casino? Yes, they will keep giving you small withdrawals without KYC but as soon as you win something big, all of sudden they will realize that you need to do KYC as how you won this big amount. In most of the cases, they will never approve your KYC and never let you withdraw.

If you want to just play for fun, then these casinos may be the right choice for you but if you really want the casino to let you withdraw for all your wins, then you need to register and play at trusted KYC gambling casino.

How can a NO KYC casino get a Curacao gambling license? Isn't KYC a requirement for getting a gambling license?
It would be nice if you add gambler feedback about which NO KYC casinos are trustworthy and which ones scammed their players in the past.
The problem is that many casinos don't require KYC right after signup but only after the gambler initiates a withdrawal. This seems like a misleading business practice to me, but almost all crypto casinos are doing it.
Anyway, good luck with this project, OP.

That is one of the problem of no KYC casinos give to gamblers, mostly the withdrawal, since there is no KYC they would used another things to delay withdraw and suspend and ban accounts. If a casino offer no KYC service and they really do the right thing then, no KYC is the best because there will be no stress. And because of what is happening in the online gambling sector with fault claim of identify and other fraudulent activities, almost all casinos ask for KYC to identify the real owner of the account. So if any casino is practicing no KYC then they should be fair enough to deal with gamblers when they win.

Quite an interesting list and it's very good for people who really don't like gambling sites that enforce KYC on their customers, there are some sites that have licenses and don't enforce KYC, but I don't know how long they last? On average, casinos that already have large valuations and can be accessed by many people from various countries, usually at that point they impose KYC, especially if during their operational journey these casinos are used for illegal acts such as money laundering and so on by users of their services that can be detrimental, there is no choice they will enforce because of course they will get pressure from the local government or in every country that can access the site.

So I visited the site NoToKYC.com, downloaded the 10 KYC that you listed there and below is the list.

Now I don't think we need to again visit the site to see the same casino lists over and over again.



Now there are many trusted casinos out there, but require KYC. So it is now up to us to decide whether we prefer a non-KYC casino with the risk of losing money or choose a more trusted casino that requires us to perform KYC.

This word is bullshit here, you definitely know that. You don't use any artificial intelligence to rank crypto casinos, it's just a manual list that has to meet your criteria.
There is a casino called betplay.io on top of your list but when I hover the mouse over rating, it shows that this casino doesn't have license but actually when I visit the website, it states that it has Costa Rica license.
Also, you have to double check the KYC level of casinos that you grant them in your list. For example, Justbit and Jackbit are granted KYC level 0 on your website while they don't fulfill the requirement for that badge.
KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification.
Justabit and Jackbit talk about KYC policy.

I've given you some merit for encouragement to keep on working on this project.

As most who know me know, I don't like gambling, I do like privacy. kycnot.me serves as a great solution for exchanging...yours could serve as a good solution for gamblers.

The obvious current problem is that you are prioritizing referral links over casinos with no kyc.

Unless you know something we don't, it seems that the list isn't entirely accurate yet. It has the potential to be a great idea if it's improved. If you do know something we don't, add insurance up to $X to collateralize your listing of a casino with a KYC term in their TOS, but is actually good for privacy/no kyc based on your knowledge/experience.

I don't think so,  because asking the support such question as whether the casino supports multiple accounts will not prove anything,  because KYC demands most times is not scheduled at the opening of accounts and if accounts don't pass the threshold it may not require KYC,  so you see why support can't give you such info because there don't have it.

The best way to know if a casino has KYC demand is first to check to know if they're licensed because all licensed casinos must follow regulatory demands,  and reading through their T&C you will see where the covers that KYC part also.

Even though many of us dislike a KYC but it's indeed better to be honest and came up with a better domain name if his website includes casinos or exchanges which KYC is still possible to be asked. But there are really sites which has a different level of KYC and there are perks that entails on them.

OP thinks that he can easily turn the heads of the people if he have that kind of domain name, but to have his own referral link on the sites that he review is allowed and actually almost all of the review sites that I visit are like that. It was their right because they promote the casino on their own website. Also the revenue that they can earn will mostly be used on their sites operation so there is no need for us to be jealous about it.

Over the years, I have seen how the rules of the casino and the entire gambling industry in general are becoming more and more tightened. 
It is now normal for casinos to require KYC identity verification if the game uses cryptocurrencies.  This is of course annoying and just infuriates me and I think that many fans of cryptocurrencies too.  Simply because the most important property of cryptocurrency since its invention was the anonymity of payments.  But the financial and banking lobbies in the USA and European countries are impudently forcing legislators of all countries to introduce this same KYC wherever they pay with cryptocurrency.  By the way, I don’t think that this is generally beneficial to human civilization, but on the contrary, it only makes people more and more controlled by the authorities, which act in most countries only on the basis of their own interests and the interests of a small group of financial magnates.  All this is bad and the introduction of KYC is only a small element of control over the income of the population.  But of course, no casinos will violate the laws and regulations set by these very governments, which in all countries always do not care much about the well-being of the general population.  And of course, they take great care of themselves.

An easy way to check whether the casino has KYC or no is to ask their support if they allow duplicate accounts. It may be against gambling responsibility, but this is the price for security.

NoToKYC if KYC is implemented at any point be it for high withdrawal or deposits plus suspected activities,  it then means that your casino is not a no KYC casino,  and there is no difference between your casino and all the other KYC compliance casinos that we have around.

For that I agree with the statement made by notblox1 calling out for why you make is look bold as if your casino is 100% KYC free,  so for that you have to work on the title of this ANN again because having it the way it is currently will only attract more questioning that you may feel a little bit negative about.

Yes, if you ask live support, maybe you can be calmer because if you don't ask then in the end you will definitely be flagged when using a VPN. The case that often happens nowadays is when most people use VPN and in the end they ask for KYC, even though the site doesn't ask for KYC in the end. will do that if there is something suspicious and also something prohibited.

It should be like that and what you say is true, you should ask live support before doing anything to access a gambling account, because I often find KYC-free casinos but in the end they ask for KYC from users who are flagged and commit violations, I'm not the user who has a problem KYC and also just a small bettor who is always safe without KYC, I think if you want to be KYC free being a small bettor is the best way. 

They will ask KYC regardless it's now, soon or in the future.

If the casino didn't stated using VPN is fine, you shouldn't directly use VPN before asking through their live support even though you have a good reason e.g. local ISP block the casino, travelling to a country where gambling is banned etc. However if you already ask through the live support, you need to expect they will ask you to complete KYC immediately.

I think it’s only decentralised casinos that are able to operate with no KYC zone and that too with lot of limitations. If they are from friendly country where gambling regulations are pretty loose end then they might just survive for longer. However, there are tiny number of casinos or rather gambling sites that are able to operate freely because simply it’s matter of money laundering.

Whenever we see sites where first income instance is Money itself then it’s gonna be connected with money laundering all the time. Authorities are more prone to watch out such sites and keep them restricted.

I’m not sure how your AI will keep up the track of all those changes but very good luck with the new concept.

I disagree. So many sites(New and Old) have proven again and again that they can request KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield which is why what you stated isn't 100% accurate.

VPN usage for casinos is complicated. It's usually risky to use them anywhere for various reasons.

I also see that cases are like this, but when a casino detects that there is a vpn being used, they immediately put the account in review mode and if they start to lose the lkyc, then they detect that it is from a prohibited country, then their account is disabled, for complete and with no opportunity for anything, I want to find casino sites and platforms that use non-kyc, but it is difficult, the one that was still there was frebiitcoin, but they also took it to comply with the characteristics of kyc, I have not complied with Those policies, I have a very old account in that casino, and I don't want to comply with it and I have stopped playing there Because those Demands are not to my Liking.

As I said before: All KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

You are either really dumb or completely naive since these sites will most definitely request KYC when they find something suspicious or if the gambler is trying to withdraw high amounts.

Their TOS helps justify their actions which is why they aren't doing anything illegal here.