Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 16. (Read 4905 times)

Maybe he is referring to the casinos shown on that page? I like the fact that they highlight KYC here. They know that this is the main thing that people are considering right now before they use the platform. I'm sure their site will get a lot of traffic because of it and it's going to be easy for them to get a referral this way.

For those who don't want a KYC, they can accept some things like if the casino has no license. They agree that this is one of the consequences for their own freedom but there are still legit non-license casinos out there, so they are going to be just fine. If a license casino shuts down, sometimes we still can't do anything and we still can't get paid so we shouldn't think that they are superior. Apart from the non-licensed one, I think a licensed casino can sometimes don't have a KYC or they don't mandate it, so some of us can also consider them sometimes.

Nice to see you responded to that, and i hard a run through the blog post earlier and i will still have a reread again later on to grasp enough understanding of what the term and condition are while using the coin to gamble most especially its advantage over other coins like Bitcoin.
Cause I am curious to know if there are special odds allocations for those who use the coin to stake their games, or is it the same as every other listed coin in the casinos that accept them?

Thank you for all your feedback guys  

We published a blog post about the best privacy coins . You can use them to gamble as we have some no kyc crypto casinos which also accept this coins to enhance your privacy.

I very much go with your opinion, kyc on different casino platforms are supposed to be of different levels or grade when it comes to difficulty, but then in the end, kyc is still kyc no matter how easy or hard it is to pass, it is still the same personal documents that the user will have to submit for the verification..

So yeah, I go with your opinion on the matter of kyc classification, and speaking about playing on the casinos to gain first hand experience, if op is not doing that or has not done that on the few casinos he has already reviewed, then I wonder what information he or she is sharing, the mandatory job of a reviewer is that you play on the site, test the deposit and withdrawals with different amount of money , see how quick or how much delay it takes before the casino process a withdrawal request, play some of the games as well, I know this is the reviewer risking his or her funds but no one should ever launch a review site if he or she is not ready to sacrifice both time and money to gain first hand experience.

I know it's not easy launching a casino review site You'll have to do extensive reviews and try the casino so you can explore the casino and come out with good reviews, but choosing a concept that is not popular with a limited number of casinos that you can include and promote is not good when it comes to profitability.

You even come out with your own terms of KYC, when we all know there is no such thing as KYC classification when we say NO it is no, it will just confuse your readers.

Why not put level 4 and level 5 so you can include all the casinos 

He still has it on his list and that is not good he should consider taking down a casino with questionable status even if the list is going too short, it's his responsibility to only present the best and most reputable casinos.

I find the list useless when you say no KYC then it says no KYC. There is no such thing as level 1 no-KYC casinos he just put a tag on these casinos, If a user is looking for a no-KYC casino I don't think he will trust this platform/

Well in view of all this I can say that the No KYC casinos that are currently there now may be that for some players things are different, there are minimum requirements and they are not so concerned about what happens, particularly the casino list What do you have here, I didn't know that they didn't have the No KYC requirement, generally I am a person who likes very reliable casinos, Betplay is one that I have seen there, I think it is good, now the casino that most It hurt me that it didn't have KYC, it was ekll from freebitco.in, because it is a casino that has had a lot of relevance in my life, it was the casino that I have seen all the time, I have played, I have lost, I have won, I have withdrawn, I have deposited with complete normality, never without problems, and besides that their game of twos is the most classic of all, and for that reason I think that things when they are without KYC work better and obviously they let people enter with the use of VPN, I don't know if these casinos comply with that standard, but I would really be a supporter that this is the best thing to do.

As for the casinos that are here, it may be that they do not have the use of KYC, but for how long? The truth is that now there are many problems regarding this, there are casinos that are guided only by doing things like not also accepting the VPN from other countries, and I don't see this as fair, a few years ago, the casinos had no reasons to not accept people with KYC or VPN, now things are so tight that although it is difficult to attract potential players, they do not allow them to have anonymity, privacy and they also prohibit countries, so these types of things are the that a casino should accept, not have any of that, in fact as I had said before, I didn't know that these casinos did not have the KYC requirement, so we could think that that is one way to do things well, and that a government matters ? If a ca casino business the government does not fall.

A new casino, exchange & exclusive bonus was added 

Are you serious? Why would he want to do that? His site is basically advertising no-KYC sites which is clearly debatable to a large extent. It's like a guide to help gamblers who wish to avoid KYC.

Also, his site isn't offering no-KYC facilities. Check the site properly before posting.

By the way, this is indeed a good marketing ploy.  Any normal person will always prefer to receive money without anyone knowing that he received it.  This could be winning in a casino or in any other case.  I would even correlate this desire with the freedom inherent in the human psyche.  By receiving money anonymously, you are not obliged to explain or relort anything to anyone, and this means that you are free from such unnecessary actions or even responsibilities.  Therefore, anonymity in payments is important.
 Also, many people do not want anyone to know that they are gambling in a casino.  And here KYC is, of course, a completely unnecessary procedure.  So, as it turns out, the absence of KYC is necessary for many people and this desire is naturally in high demand.  And this is good marketing.

Alright these types of information can really help someone who is in need of such a site. The OP could have been designed better, but still works from me. I can see that you have added all the necessary information required here. Moreover my only complaint is that the segregation is done by AI. I mean are we in such a stage that we have to rely on AIs suggestions? OP could have done this work manually, and it would have been attracted more customers to your site. Nevertheless wish you best of luck for your future.

Is there such a thing as KYC level 1 as defined by casinos? It is either they ask it or not, your platform description is misleading and deceptive and there's one questionable name in your NO KYC list.
For you to have a list you disregard the reputation of the casinos if you stick to straight NO KYC you'll only have 4.

Definitely, doubt the motive of the unlicensed casino if they started asking KYC from their clients.
Because only licensed casinos usually require their players to submit KYC verification because of the AML policy that they need to abide.
The site list offered by the OP may be good to some players who really don't want to submit their KYC.
However, the dilemma of getting screwed is always there because unlicensed casinos can really mess up with the player's funds if they want to.
Also from the OPs list, I have seen some like vavada which is requiring KYC from their clients before withdrawal, so don't know why it is on the list. He can check it on their terms here - https://vavada.com/en/terms-and-conditions, and verification of identity seems needed on this site.

Not for some reason but those 2 on the list will only required KYC once they finally get their casino license if they are still pursuing it. Having a license is the only reason why casino ask for KYC due to AML policy. Those casino that asking KYC without license is committing an illegal KYC since they have no right to ask for it since they are not regulated by the law.

I believe a no KYC casino incorporates some level of risk too since unlicensed casino typically turns into scam since they don't have any commitment or doxxed to operate legally.

Your site name is really weird. no kyc cephalitis is highlighted with your site name. it is good to see you already bought copper membership It looks like you are very serious about your casino site.  So you can run signature campaign for better promotion of your site.  Signature campaigns will enable your site to reach different sections of the forum.  Because this forum has more than 3.5 million members many gamble from there.  Since your site is offering No kyc facilities so many can be attracted here. that's why you can try it

Only two so far on his list but we never know Maybe in the future for some reason they might go level 1 no KYC There are circumstances where KYC is necessary to catch cheaters to show compliant to authorities and their license issuers, there are no KYC casinos that change their terms so they can protect their casinos from cheaters or they are forced by their license issuers or the regulators.

OP's site is an affiliate platform so he will try to be different and try to target specific gamblers who are looking for NO KYC casino, but be sure everything that is on his list is reputable, Some members have reported that one questionable casino is on the list.

It has always been a big flaup to many casinos who request for gamblers' documents for verifications but in the end leak the documents to hackers who may have them on the black market for various criminal reasons.

More also is the risk of those documents being used to commit various degrees of crimes,  putting the original owners of those documents at risk of legal problems,  so This is the reason that KYC is mostly avoided by cryptocurrency users.

I definitely will have to agree with you, I think discussions relating to KYC have become the most discussed topic in the gambling boards of this forum, and I believe this is same for several other forums as well, several gamblers hate the hassle of trying to pass kyc verification for several reasons, for some, it's as a result of wanting to maintain their privacy, for some others, it's probably because they don't have any government issued documents acceptable by the casino for their kyc verification, I was once there so I perfectly understand this, there was a time when I had no government issued document to enable pass kyc verifications, at that time, I avoided every and any casino where I will be required to verify my account before deposit or withdrawal, but all this changed when I eventually got my driver's license, plus my national id card, plus other government issued documents as well ..

Anyways, happy that there are still some casinos where kyc is a no, but how long will kyc continue to be a no on this casinos? Specially with the increasing regulation on crypto..

I like the way you responded here, but the no-KYC casinos might not be entirely bad, only that the risk of working with them is high. Those with KYC still scam people, not to mention those that are not registered or regulated anywhere. Although the registration and regulation are much overrated in casinos as those countries and regulators do little or nothing to protect the interests of gamblers, still, one will be sure that they are duly registered and not dealing with an entirely criminal ring that deals with laundering money and perpetrating some illicit flows.

About the site, what they say whatsoever might be biased since there is an affiliate relation. The risk with no-KYC casinos is there, it's people that should be careful. I'm glad that at least two of them are advertising on BTT, it's another layer of confidence at least until people complain about them.

Yes, because it doesn't guarantee that you play on a site that is free of KYC or is called decentralized, and vice versa, but there are not too many cases of licensed casinos committing big fraud and the cases can still be investigated, while decentralized casinos may not be so safe and they don't even have a license even though they The reality is that you can get a license easily if you have a lot of money.

But it all comes back to each user because every gambler has his own views, I'm not someone who worries too much about KYC and never complain about it, as long as I play on a big site and have a high reputation on this forum of course I feel safe, after all I just small gambler so the casino will not ask me to complete KYC and as long as I play clean and honestly there will be no risk to that KYC.