I don't think temporary no KYC is completely No KYC.
I thought that this site is providing a list of casinos where there is no KYC at all, but in fact all the casinos in the list are having possible KYC verification.
The chosen domain name NoToKYC is really good for marketing to attract gamblers who do not want to pass KYC in crypto casinos, without a doubt it is an effective to attract but once people visit the list, they will start to get disappointed.
However having "NO" is like too much because nowadays it is really hard to find casino which is completely KYC free.
Maybe having a name like "KYCfriendlycasino" will be much more reasonable, but of course the owner has a full right to choose which name for his site.
Yeah the name of the site is good for marketing but for sensitive people that feels being click baited, the name itself can backfire making visitors annoyed because they feel that they are being cheated of their time since the list of casinos on the site all required KYC in some point of time.
The site seems like it was designed to funnel traffic to OP's referral links. The "No KYC" angle is great for advertising but as several people have pointed out these claims are a bit dubious. I would've preferred if they followed kycnot.me's approach where the main listing criteria isn't whether they can gain financially. It might still be a useful site but when there is a financial motive there is a possibility that the information we receive might be biased.