Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 9. (Read 4881 times)

In my opinion, when the industry is growing we cant avoid the KYC sooner or later the government will come to everything and everyone they need money and they need to spend it even tho with all regulations they are still thirsty for money, take example of the US that has trillion of dollar debt but still need more.

So yeah the point is KYC will be there but I do believe crypto community is also built up against it. maybe in future the website that we know today is going to missing or dead because new rule from gov but they are gonna re-birth and the cycle is continue.

and I agree with you maybe we should comply with gov and do the KYC but after all there will be that doesn't like the gov and keep use non Kyc exchange or gambling site

You are right, personally I have always seen cc asinso as a part of being able to do something better, the casinos that I trust are few in reality but in those casinos I have already completed my KYC, although to be honest when you are a customer of a particular casino They ask for very little KYC, I have seen that the new casinos always ask for KYC and it is difficult to get a casino that does not do the KYC, really hard, the casinos that are decentralized yes, but based on the things that we see, the Decentralized casinos have many considionces that many of us do not like, for example the fact of making any movement, that movement is not paid, we must admit that things with jkyc and lops casinos have different requirements.

It is well known that centralized casinos are much better than decentralized ones, for me they are the best, of course that also has its cost, and it is the KYC, I also understand that there are many players who do not want to give their data, I understand why mostly things when giving data is delicate, I think that no one likes to give their data, it is something unreasonable.

I have always made it clear that things cannot happen when you try to do them differently, because in the sense that you can take advantage of what a person can give for the best and best, as they have said, Binance gave a great sum, but Binance surrenders at the feet of any police or any government, they are capable of blocking the funds of an entire country if they want to do so so that they can carry out investigations, that is how it is, which I do not understand and the truth is something which I wouldn't do for anything in the world, now the things that are seen from the point of view of the casino, each one of them well I don't know if they will be like that with the players' data, some yes, some no, that's why I find the ones that are more reliable, I feel like I have more security in sending my data, of course that's my point of view.

That's it. Unless a casino does not want to be loud in the industry, they can do without regulations. if I may ask, who establishes a business and does not want it to flourish globally? It happened to Exchanges and also to mixers, casinos will not be a stumbling block.

I have to know why it is also US and EU while the internet is free. You can be hosted and registered in one African countries and still make wave elsewhere. What I'm I getting wrong?

I believe that there will always be casinos that will be KYC-free, or at least without mandatory KYC, and I will stick with those casinos. But I agree that more regulations are coming and it will be tricky for many crypto casinos & services to avoid KYC rules, especially for the ones who aim big and wish to operate in the US and EU. Anyway, when dealing with money people should always be ready for KYC...

This must be the right mindset. We understand how the market is going now in terms of regulation, even Binance the biggest exchange paid a huge penalty for their violation, that's how regulators are very desperate in implementing the law, and it could also happen in the gambling industry.

A gambling site that advertises no to KYC is surely unregulated, but the question here, are you willing to risk big amount of money for this kind of gambling site? If your answer is yes, then this is the right site for you. However, I'm pretty sure that majority of gamblers will choose a regulated and reputable casino to trust their money, so this kind of site (no kyc) will just likely exist in the short period of time.

Most gamblers do not even have any reason why they are running away from KYC. Even honest gamblers are now afraid of KYC. They might not be aware that the other man who is avoiding KYC might be looking for a way to cheat the system. It is difficult not easy to a completely non KYC casino. It is either the gambler wants to cheat the system or vice versa.

If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

When government agencies or those authorized by the state officially request or even require identity verification under the KYC procedure, it is at least clear that this is a requirement of the legislation of the relevant jurisdiction or the acceptance of international norms and regulations imposed by the global banking lobby by this jurisdiction. 
But if KYC is required by some casino, or for example by a crypto wallet operator like Blockchain.com, then this is simply a leak of confidential personal information.  And we all know examples of hacking of relevant personal information databases, such as the hacking of the Ledger order mailing database in 2019.  Then hundreds of thousands of users of this wallet were affected.  So, in any case, you should be careful about these issues of personal security and not thoughtlessly go through KYC whenever private business owners ask you to do so. 
And in gambling and crypto-casinos this is now becoming the norm, which, for example, just infuriates me.

Sigh! How far can you run from casinos that have KYC requirements? It's better to consider such casinos instead of those that are hiding underground to run their casinos and using non kyc to lure people, this isn't Bitcoin that's decentralized and out of the government reach, this is a casino.

If you are still believing that a casino can run without been regulated then you are at a greater risks, because such casinos can decide to do anything, mostly when you won't see it coming, a regulated casino is still operating under the government papers, but a non regulated casino can't be fought by the law, it's like they don't even exist.

Be careful what you wish for, if you don't like passing KYC the only option left is to start going to located casino in your area to gamble, use the machines and take your leave after, no form of registration, no need for KYC verification.

That is the right thinking here , they have not asking KYC when they are new or when you deposit but eventually as your need of withdrawals ? then questioning will come and yes KYC will happen and this is the first step in holding our funds.
So lets start adopting KYC than expecting this and that but after ? you are failing what you seems to be believing .
and besides KYC will be the thing of everything that  involves money sooner or later so why not practice this earlier for easy acceptance .

You will not go in thag condition if you just select the reputable in first place. Since you will only think fight against unknown enemy if you risk to much on new things since you think they are exciting or trying to avail those unrealistic bonus that they are offering. So minimize the risk for getting scam or facing any problems related to activities done I think the only practical solution there is never gamble to any unknown casino especially if they offer unreal conditions or situations so that we will not fall if they scam people who believe that they deliver. Also just like what you said we should gamble what we can afford to lose so that we will be fine if something bad happen especially if we commit bad decisions regarding on this activities.

first of all, how to know a site that is following guidelines as long as kyc is concern is to check how much their performance have been in terms of frequent changing of the terms, and how the resolves issue's as regards and relate kyc and accounts restrictions are concerned, because alit of time that is the place where the while crisis starts from, since kyc arw triggered for a number of things which balance is one of such, e.g when gou want to make a withdrawal that is above $5000 you may be asked to verify your identity at that point.

So when you are asked, if you want to go through a kyc from a casino you shouldn't be confused since you agreed to that fact about the casino and how best their handle the issues with kyc and how best they follow it.

One of the most difficult task to do is in fighting an unknown enemy, this will give one a very tough time because you don't know them, how can you then strike for an attack back on them, gambling platforms are exactly like this, you don't know the good ones from the bad even when you make research about them, there's no certainty on what you may discover, but the simple way to stay safe is to always gamble with the amount of money we can afford to loose.

The thing is that, casinos have various strategies to hold their customers to the neck because when you come across some of those shady casinos that tend to change the term and conditions just to suit their course of cheating customers, such cassino will just wake up to change their terms of service at anytime without following though process or informing the customers of the casino.


Most of such casino are scam casinos, and also we have some other casinos that have taken the time to build a reputation for themselves by following all the rules and staying tith by following all the stipulated guidelines, this is the reason why when you are choosing a casino, you must take that time to fine out all the underlying factors and practice of the casino over time so as to be able to discover which is real and scam among the actor's.

I think the same, people at some point will realize that they are ladders of a system that is always based on control by governments, by banks, because it is the need for money that makes everyone bow their heads and succumb to the imminent threats and with a lot of diplomacy that governments do, in this order of days I think it is as you say, things are Always directedTowards Control by governments, they always look for a way to get into things where they do not They have total freedom, I have seen how some regulations are established and that is something that many do not like, because the regulations are quite a lot of obstacles that are made so that people do not have freedom over financial activities, this comes down to the KYC requirements, the little requirements they set with crypto, with bitcoin, and the way to control them is by knowing who is managing these technologies to put it in their database and then make them start Paying higher taxes.

I don't know if in other countries the fact of playing in online casinos implies that they have to pay taxes, that is something that is not something that I see with good eyes for me these things have to look as ugly as possible, if I play in Anyway , if I register and want to play, why should I pay tax? Why do they have to oversee an Activity that is unrelated to a government? just for using cyypto? So sometimes I Understand very well those casino players who never Complied with their KYC , who do not play in casinos just so as not to leave their Identification there, that is something completely Understandable , I know that there is a lot of hope in the world who have a lot in bitcoin and they do not want any Government to know about their Finances and with all reason, they do not Want the government to take strong measures against those people, sometimes OTP Exchanges are very good because they Always make any action that is Difficult to do , possible through third parties.

This is why we should be thorough when choosing our new casinos, we should not limit it to what external websites tell us, and certainly not to their terms and conditions too, because I have seen some T&Cs that are indeed faulty, or maybe it is the casinos that make it looks like that so that they can change it later or use the confused state of it to cheat their customers. What I do in this situation is that if I ever see and want to deal with a no-KYC casino, I make sure that I ask my final questions to their representatives. This might change later because some would even move to KYC casinos even when they started with no-KYC and start asking people for KYC later, which might be the case of the website you posted. Some casinos will even use that excuse not to pay many of their customers who have a sizable amount of money in their accounts when that change happens.

A lot of nonsense is going on online now and you will pity some people with the way they are making them suffer and going through what they might possibly not be able to provide after this change. The main purpose of their no-KYC casinos is for them to show that they are initially against the prevailing laws/authorities and by that not asking anyone for KYC. This now will make people who want their privacy intact to open an account, and the same goes for those who are just a victim and many more who don't have clean money and all that. And before they know it, many might be trapped with the money and that could be the end of that money. Some will then fight for it if it is legit while many others will leave it there for one reason or the other. This is pathetic and I would rather go for the KYC casinos straight from the beginning, anything can change with the no-KYC ones.

The motivation of the ruling clan in the USA and in all other countries of the world as a whole is approximately the same.  This clan simply needs to control the population of their country, and fiat money and cryptocurrencies are a key factor in this process.  If there is complete information about the financial condition of a particular person or household, then the needs of such a person or household are approximately clear in advance.  Therefore, you can understand in advance what this person needs to sell and how much he will buy the product or service for, respectively.  Next, there is a basic calculation that this person or household simply will not have any money left to go beyond their current consumption of goods and services.  And you can accurately calculate the cost of services, including taxation.  Thus, total control over the population is done primitively and easily.  But secret possession of large amounts of cryptocurrency violates this principle.  So states are introducing KYC and AML and other stupid control tools against the owner of cryptocurrencies in order to include cryptocurrency lovers in the overall picture of total total control.
 By the way, this also forces people to work hard and productively.  And still don’t get rich and don’t become very rich.  What can be safely and objectively considered as a modern and humane way of enslaving people.

Nice Website Op. but why the Exchange list is too short. there are only 3 exchange listed. i see you listed 2 Swap exchanges also. I checked the swaps you added. looks like they are Centralized Swaps.
then shouldn't you add all the DEX Swap platforms? none of them require kyc as far as I know.  they are also more safer compared to these Centralized manuall exchanges.
or you just add those sites which exclusivly do partnership with you?

These days, 90% or more casinos are licensed and it is hard to find casino which is KYC-free because most casinos has the term that they reserve the right to ask KYC at some points.
This review site use "NoToKYC" as their main domain is just to attract players, because it is attractive name especially we know that there are still many gamblers who want to play anonymously.
Sooner or later those who register in the casinos because they were attracted with the NoToKYC slogan, they will be disappointed once the casino ask them to submit their personal document.

Yeah, that's true, it seems like it needs more detail, because it can lead to misunderstanding, basically some of the casinos displayed on notokyc.com sites like BC.Game, Nitrobetting, Metaspin, and Bets.io can ask users to do KYC from time to time, or may be given an explanation of the withdrawal limit for users who do not do KyC. So there will be no misunderstandings for the reader.

Yes, that's something I wanted to convey, what seems to be that I went in an almost political direction, the thing is that all this KYC stuff seems very Interesting to me, for example what you said that now the casino have to invest a lot of money so that the data is secure, that is something that all citizens do not like and obviously who is going to like to put more Money of their daily earnings for data protection,? Also right now they can do it, but as that database grows, how can casinos face these security costs? Could it be that at some point something irreverent has to be Done on the Part of the casinos ? What will happen when the casinos cannot handle this additional expense because they are facing a large expense that they had not previously anticipated , then will it be that in the near future the casinos will no longer mind leaving some licenses that allow them to continue with the KYC ? Just make sure that Since they have a good reputation , is that Enough for people to trust People like that?

Well that is something that I don't Know if it is possible, maybe I think too much , but it is an Option, a crazy option but it is an option that would guarantee them not to spend too much, with respect to the Above , I have Always seen Something , the USA Always exerts Pressure on every Process , whether or not it is in the USA, they always have to do things the way they see fit, the KYC thing is an Example,  I don't Know , But it is for me to Interpret it as a way to Control who they play with crypto , and It is very likely that those who play with Crypto have Bitcoin and those who have Bitcoin is because they probably have a lot, or I have little , whether they are whales or not, and that is something they Need to know so that in the midst of the Regulations of the countries They can say that they want to implement Special Taxes and thus start with some intimidation, but this is the only thing I imagine , is that I am from a government system where one Already knows more or less what is Coming.