Its not a valid response to just classify things as "postmodernist" but that is almost all you do. Even if it was postmodernist, you haven't addressed any of the questions or facts put forward. You haven't even explained how its postmodernist.
Perhaps its because you are afraid of your own answers to the questions that have been put forward. Perhaps answering the questions would force you into a contradiction.
The irony of someone who is so paranoid about falling under authoritarian rule calling for someone be locked up for asking questions is golden. I guess you are an authoritarian as long as you get to be the dictator.
Harriet Tubman's underground railroad was illegal, Nicholas Winton's smuggling of Jewish children during the Holocaust was illegal, Jim crow sit ins were illegal. Might is not right and sometimes the best thing to do is illegal and the law itself is unjust.
Additionally, danger is measurable. You don't just get to say my positions are dangerous when its clear that the most dangerous options would be for these people to stay stranded in northern Mexico or return home. Even with the teargas and concentration camps, pushing the US is the option that gives them the best opportunity to achieve safety and that is what is driving this entire process.
Perhaps its because you are afraid of your own answers to the questions that have been put forward. Perhaps answering the questions would force you into a contradiction.
The irony of someone who is so paranoid about falling under authoritarian rule calling for someone be locked up for asking questions is golden. I guess you are an authoritarian as long as you get to be the dictator.
Harriet Tubman's underground railroad was illegal, Nicholas Winton's smuggling of Jewish children during the Holocaust was illegal, Jim crow sit ins were illegal. Might is not right and sometimes the best thing to do is illegal and the law itself is unjust.
Additionally, danger is measurable. You don't just get to say my positions are dangerous when its clear that the most dangerous options would be for these people to stay stranded in northern Mexico or return home. Even with the teargas and concentration camps, pushing the US is the option that gives them the best opportunity to achieve safety and that is what is driving this entire process.
It is all I do when all you do is post relativist deconstructivist bullshit straight out of Critical Theory. "Postmodernist mind mush" isn't an insult, it is an observation of the fact that you repeatedly use the Hegelian dialectic to argue contradictory views of your ideology in order to create a relativist subjectivity that on a Sophistic level seems to be valid, but upon closer critical examination is nothing but 100% horse shit right out of your imagination.
You CONSTANTLY contradict yourself and you have the nerve to accuse me of being afraid of examining the truth because I might find conflict? Yeah, those loons being afraid of authoritarian rule! Who in their right mind would think active prevention of ideologies that spawn authoritarianism is worth while? Never in history has this ideology lead to genocide! Quite paranoid. Maybe instead we should go out and punch some Nazis?
I didn't call for you to be locked up. I was telling you regardless of how you justify your bullshit in your mind, you are still actively advocating for conditions that would destroy the nation, and as a result I wouldn't be surprised if you ended up in a cage over it if you are taking any actions in that direction.
And maybe you don't want to break down my positions. Thats fine. You still haven't answered any of my questions about your position in this thread.
There is a difference between civil disobedience and ignoring laws that endanger others. You wanna risk jail time to protest that is on you. You don't get to trade OTHER PEOPLE'S security for your cause. Who's safety? At what cost? Who pays that cost? You certainly fucking aren't but you have no problem putting that burden on everyone else right? It is very generous of you to spend other people's money and give away their safety. You are quite a saint. Just like Harriet Tubman.
No I am actually arguing for the opposite of what you stated in bold. Not only am I against funding a wall that would jeopardize the safety of these people, I am actually advocating for the abolishment of ICE which would save a lot of money. It seems you are the one arguing we spend money to send these people back to very dangerous conditions. Quote
What's driving this entire process is the Leftist agitators and funding sources that created this entire problem, and now seems to have left these poor people to their own devices at the border's edge. I think you should go take care of them, and pay their way back home.
The violence in Honduras is what is driving this entire process. Do you think leftist agitators destabilized these countries? I donate to border angels. https://www.borderangels.org/ 
