[NRS|NoirShares] POW ENDING at 50k | DACs | MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE 6/23/2014 - page 17.

barwizi

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Queeq on July 04, 2014, 01:53:06 PM

Quote from: barwizi on July 04, 2014, 01:50:08 PM

Quote from: Chaosbubba on July 04, 2014, 01:34:42 PM

Now PoW is ended.

What's the future plan?

Huh

First finish up wallet update for NRS then pick one of the closest projects to completion and finish it up, and release.

What is the closest project? Is there a page that is regularly updated with latest info about them?

i need another dev asap. the skipping between projects is taking a toll and causing delays.

Queeq

sr. member

Activity: 427

Merit: 250

Quote from: barwizi on July 04, 2014, 01:50:08 PM

Quote from: Chaosbubba on July 04, 2014, 01:34:42 PM

Now PoW is ended.

What's the future plan?

Huh

First finish up wallet update for NRS then pick one of the closest projects to completion and finish it up, and release.

What is the closest project? Is there a page that is regularly updated with latest info about them?

barwizi

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Chaosbubba on July 04, 2014, 01:34:42 PM

Now PoW is ended.

What's the future plan?

Huh

First finish up wallet update for NRS then pick one of the closest projects to completion and finish it up, and release.

barwizi

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jfnail on July 04, 2014, 01:19:36 PM

i support you NRS team

lets get price up again

Thanks

Chaosbubba

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Now PoW is ended.

What's the future plan?

Huh

jfnail

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

i support you NRS team

lets get price up again

barwizi

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

My Activity Report:-

Debugging: The return of the Code Monkey Curse

Cry

Nrsinv

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 10

Quote from: Mario241077 on July 04, 2014, 12:59:18 AM

and as already written, the spamer your traget have been reached and the price is low. they are silent.

the difference to wallstreet forums, there you will be blocked, if you created an undocumented allegation and thus spreading lies.

Here, anyone can do what he wants!

in two weeks we are back at 0.0003, because their cheap shares are then run through the staking.

so simple is that

makes a profit of about 200-500% in two weeks

I also saw that to when I came back from my trip. I also know that I wouldn't be here if one person owned 100% of the company. I havn't stopped buying but am interested in Logan's report. I have potential investors.

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

and as already written, the spamer your traget have been reached and the price is low. they are silent.

the difference to wallstreet forums, there you will be blocked, if you created an undocumented allegation and thus spreading lies.

Here, anyone can do what he wants!

in two weeks we are back at 0.0003, because their cheap shares are then run through the staking.

so simple is that

makes a profit of about 200-500% in two weeks

andyatcrux

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Price is on the rise. Recovered nearly 50% from a day ago. Reality slowly settling back in to NRSville.

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

Fraud is what the whole Barker to do here. because they induce unknowing ones or new beginner or holders of their shares from panic and fear to the lowest prices for sale.
and this panic they themselves have created.

they cheat by spreading allegations with their spam and false content. induce others to sell.
is the price then deep. Buy this spammer then even the cheap shares in large quantities. so this scam running.

that's here target, cheap buy many shares

this is the true scam.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7630370
July 02, 2014, 01:14:23 AM

LemonAndFries the hothead, the whole nor been fueled.
even though he was afraid for his shares

I know this spameattacks already from wallstreet forums.

there are always the same contentless post, with big letters and bright colors. it is these types just about to create panic.

and as we see, I've already written, the award will now recover quickly. because this spamer who now shopped nice and cheap.
now they also want their share sale profitable again. So must the price high.

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

Quote from: andyatcrux on July 03, 2014, 11:35:35 PM

Quote from: Frigga77 on July 03, 2014, 12:44:06 PM

Quote from: Nrsinv on July 03, 2014, 10:59:35 AM

Quote from: jfnail on July 03, 2014, 01:26:38 AM

just ignore LemonAndFries

he is Full of FUD here ...

and lets NRS back to track ..

dont hear LemonAndFries ...

If the voting went through and the answer was a majority "yes". That GF member would be stripped from his/her position and refunded back what was owed at time of purchase.

That would not be fair, I certainly would not vote "yes" for that. Remember also that LemonAndFries once was a supporter also and has been there since the beginning, as has Lazj99. And then ask yourself, what is it what disappointed him so much that he got so mad? Because things have happened. And maybe he is overreacting, but try also to understand his point of view, he feels screwed. In Dutch there is a saying, who throws the ball to a wall must expect it to come back to him. If you see smoke, there must be fire.
130k NRS must have been at least 26 bitcoins at the time of selling. Dumping such an amount without giving a good reason is not cool. Keeping it a secret is also not cool. So this reaction is what you could have expected.

I am not being snarky here, I really want to understand. The selling was divulged by the seller after the fact. Was the secret during the selling? What market effect would have ensued with an announcement of selling 130K coins before selling them? Was it not better to do so slowly "secretly" on the rise by selling and buying to generate trade volume (positive effect one) and not crash the price? Because to my understanding that is exactly how the coins were put into the market. And again, isn't the use of the term "dumping" misplaced and inaccurate in this case?

the price slipped because the spamer uncertainty have brought pure lie with her. so were almost no more buyers who bought the ASK, it was only the BID served.

From a particular point it is then coated sales to panic. the price dropped to about -80% to -120%. he has now stabilized at around 40-50%.

manfeel

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Dear DEVS,you do your right things and make your company better and better.
Rumors stop at the wise.

andyatcrux

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Frigga77 on July 03, 2014, 12:44:06 PM

Quote from: Nrsinv on July 03, 2014, 10:59:35 AM

Quote from: jfnail on July 03, 2014, 01:26:38 AM

just ignore LemonAndFries

he is Full of FUD here ...

and lets NRS back to track ..

dont hear LemonAndFries ...

If the voting went through and the answer was a majority "yes". That GF member would be stripped from his/her position and refunded back what was owed at time of purchase.

That would not be fair, I certainly would not vote "yes" for that. Remember also that LemonAndFries once was a supporter also and has been there since the beginning, as has Lazj99. And then ask yourself, what is it what disappointed him so much that he got so mad? Because things have happened. And maybe he is overreacting, but try also to understand his point of view, he feels screwed. In Dutch there is a saying, who throws the ball to a wall must expect it to come back to him. If you see smoke, there must be fire.
130k NRS must have been at least 26 bitcoins at the time of selling. Dumping such an amount without giving a good reason is not cool. Keeping it a secret is also not cool. So this reaction is what you could have expected.

I am not being snarky here, I really want to understand. The selling was divulged by the seller after the fact. Was the secret during the selling? What market effect would have ensued with an announcement of selling 130K coins before selling them? Was it not better to do so slowly "secretly" on the rise by selling and buying to generate trade volume (positive effect one) and not crash the price? Because to my understanding that is exactly how the coins were put into the market. And again, isn't the use of the term "dumping" misplaced and inaccurate in this case?

Nrsinv

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 10

Quote from: Frigga77 on July 03, 2014, 12:44:06 PM

Quote from: Nrsinv on July 03, 2014, 10:59:35 AM

Quote from: jfnail on July 03, 2014, 01:26:38 AM

just ignore LemonAndFries

he is Full of FUD here ...

and lets NRS back to track ..

dont hear LemonAndFries ...

If the voting went through and the answer was a majority "yes". That GF member would be stripped from his/her position and refunded back what was owed at time of purchase.

That would not be fair, I certainly would not vote "yes" for that. Remember also that LemonAndFries once was a supporter also and has been there since the beginning, as has Lazj99. And then ask yourself, what is it what disappointed him so much that he got so mad? Because things have happened. And maybe he is overreacting, but try also to understand his point of view, he feels screwed. In Dutch there is a saying, who throws the ball to a wall must expect it to come back to him. If you see smoke, there must be fire.
130k NRS must have been at least 26 bitcoins at the time of selling. Dumping such an amount without giving a good reason is not cool. Keeping it a secret is also not cool. So this reaction is what you could have expected.

Agreed and I am awaiting Logans report and respect your decision

Frigga77

sr. member

Activity: 379

Merit: 250

Quote from: Nrsinv on July 03, 2014, 10:59:35 AM

Quote from: jfnail on July 03, 2014, 01:26:38 AM

just ignore LemonAndFries

he is Full of FUD here ...

and lets NRS back to track ..

dont hear LemonAndFries ...

If the voting went through and the answer was a majority "yes". That GF member would be stripped from his/her position and refunded back what was owed at time of purchase.

That would not be fair, I certainly would not vote "yes" for that. Remember also that LemonAndFries once was a supporter also and has been there since the beginning, as has Lazj99. And then ask yourself, what is it what disappointed him so much that he got so mad? Because things have happened. And maybe he is overreacting, but try also to understand his point of view, he feels screwed. In Dutch there is a saying, who throws the ball to a wall must expect it to come back to him. If you see smoke, there must be fire.
130k NRS must have been at least 26 bitcoins at the time of selling. Dumping such an amount without giving a good reason is not cool. Keeping it a secret is also not cool. So this reaction is what you could have expected.

JakeThePanda

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: Nrsinv on July 02, 2014, 10:59:02 PM

2. Barwizi, you did a great job adding liquidity since we only had polo and Btc38 if what Laz and Jake were saying was true.

What did I say?

LemonAndFries

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

how about holding a vote for a new CEO?

it's sad that you all are falling for this simple manipulation tactics by Barwizi

diverting the attention towards me instead of trying to solve the problem, which is the CEO

vote out Barwizi and replace him with someone that actually has good intentions towards this project and is competent, not just live off the trust and funds of investors

I will leave it alone now. and please, grow a spine

Nrsinv

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 10

Quote from: jfnail on July 03, 2014, 01:26:38 AM

just ignore LemonAndFries

he is Full of FUD here ...

and lets NRS back to track ..

dont hear LemonAndFries ...

If the voting went through and the answer was a majority "yes". That GF member would be stripped from his/her position and refunded back what was owed at time of purchase.

Also, I would be in agreement to have a safety fund included just for this on every transaction monitored by the CFO and publicly shared to the group.

Just a little building of the infrastructure..... Maybe to difficult yet with the technology we have?

ever1135

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: Mario241077 on July 02, 2014, 03:38:32 PM

Quote from: Mario241077 on July 01, 2014, 02:36:41 PM

Quote from: Anduril_FotW on July 01, 2014, 09:07:36 AM

Quote from: barwizi on July 01, 2014, 05:58:34 AM

You are all facing the same issue, rouge nodes that are transmitting incorrect chain. version 60007 is the latest and syncs just fine, please look in your debug log and on "getpeerinfo" in your wallet, find the nodes broadcasting the bad chain and block them. We realised that if we do a complete forced peer block in the first phase of cutting them out, we run the risk of completely fragmenting the chain. This update allows people to sync, the next with a version bump again will completely lock out all other peers. We made a mistake in the first version so we split the update into two, as you can see, some have working wallets and others do not. You'll find that most who are having issues are connecting to the same set of nodes.

Please block the bad nodes in your firewall settings

Control Panel\System and Security\Windows Firewall

then go to advanced settings and modify your invound and out bound rules to block the offending nodes.

Hi Barwizi and others,

Unfortunately I also cheered a little bit too early. After I downloaded the wallet and synced it without problems, I closed and re-opened the wallet and then it was stuck again at 2700 blocks ago and not syncing anymore. Also not after more then an hour.

To try and solve this, I took the following steps (which worked):

1. I cleared everything from my %appdata%\noirshares folder except for the wallet.dat file

2. I used Notepad to create a Noirshares.conf file in my %appdata%\noirshares folder. (if you do this, make sure you save the file as Noirshares.conf while "All files" is selected. Otherwise you might save it as a .txt file)

3. In the Noirshares.conf file, you enter the following text:

checkblocks=1

addnode=ypool.net
addnode=nrs.argakiig.us
addnode=173.236.43.58:39565
addnode=66.69.215.216:64946
addnode=5.9.158.79:47779
addnode=178.125.216.61:63731
addnode=107.170.207.147:8500
addnode=8.38.76.74:8500
addnode=121.185.195.12:8500
addnode=14.201.25.59:8500
addnode=70.114.143.108:8500
addnode=124.168.225.125:50023
addnode=59.55.230.181:59019
addnode=65.128.192.240:8500
addnode=98.250.252.199:8714
addnode=222.242.174.137:11054
addnode=88.8.127.16:49448
addnode=192.99.144.139:59973
addnode=77.28.2.49:44534
addnode=198.101.10.110:8500
addnode=75.143.69.254:8500
addnode=86.163.25.105:59196
addnode=83.227.236.11:63228
addnode=85.243.107.186:51194
addnode=211.149.148.150:58600
addnode=183.66.32.185:61793
addnode=82.66.239.16:50554
addnode=124.231.7.138:6415
addnode=118.186.153.220:55145
addnode=212.117.32.160:63075
addnode=87.231.15.229:54376
addnode=77.185.64.103:51852
addnode=107.170.254.5
addnode= 41.78.77.178
addnode=192.241.213.244
addnode=172.245.183.30
addnode=162.243.131.88
addnode=54.213.71.178
addnode=192.241.213.224
addnode=54.80.61.11
addnode=198.199.96.129
addnode=54.197.175.238

4. Run the Noirshares QT client again and it will start syncing again from the beginning. It might get stuck a few times in the end, but then just close the client and start it again and it should continue to sync.

5. After it has totally finihed syncing, you should be able to open the client again and it should remain up to date.

This should however ofcourse not be necessary and everybody should just be able to download the client and it should just work.
So please DEV's focus your energy on building a completely functioning wallet without all these issues.
After that it would be nice to get some updates on where NRS is going so we can all squash the trolling going on here and built a strong community again.
The last days have not been good for my investment, so let's turn it around guys ! Cool

checkblocks 750 works too

is works, without old peers

It also works for me.

Topic: [NRS|NoirShares] POW ENDING at 50k | DACs | MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE 6/23/2014 - page 17. (Read 141667 times)