Pages:
Author

Topic: Null input error - page 9. (Read 58196 times)

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 504
January 22, 2016, 05:00:51 AM
Cryptodromeda's point may be that you miss the obvious sometimes. And design work is part of marketing.
My point is Monero folks think they know everything and don't need to listen to anyone. And they censor what they don't want to hear.

Sorry but that's absolute fucking bollocks.

No-one is censoring anything. If you vocalise lengthy passages about things un-related to Monero Speculation on a Monero Speculation thread, guess what's going to happen? How can you divorce yourself from the supreme objectivity to which you hold so dear and not see something so painfully obvious?

How on earth has the Monero community attacked you or your project? I have only witnessed the Monero community act in an entirely receptive and accommodating manner to both your technical suggestions and your personal predispositions.

You're really going full-troll on this.

By the way, the entire point of Monero is that anyone can contribute. If you've something to contribute then fucking contribute. No-one is stopping you from participation. Either get yourself over to GitHub and help out, or don't. Either way, stop with the BS and the borderline reverse trolling.

And it's really disappointing to see a good man whore himself out on a troll thread such as this. If you side with trolls and scam-artists then you will be considered as such.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 22, 2016, 04:52:26 AM
I've also noticed that Monero has been inserting itself in numerous Wikipedia pages. Here is an example:

Other platforms which refute Zooko's conjecture, include: Twister and Monero OpenAlias.

Monero seems to have not understood that willynilly promotion is useless[counterproductive and perceived as spam] without a marketing strategy.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 22, 2016, 04:34:52 AM
Cryptodromeda's point may be that you miss the obvious sometimes. And design work is part of marketing.

Everyone misses the obvious sometimes (and especially when rushing and not trying to be exacting), and my point is Monero folks think they know everything and don't need to listen to anyone. And they censor what they don't want to hear. And they never identified their strategic market.

Design work is one (small) aspect of implementing a marketing strategy. Marketing is about identifying markets and the necessary implementation to achieve those markets. So graphic design is very far down the food chain of marketing (except perhaps in an arena where graphical arts is the major component of the market, e.g. selling art).
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
January 22, 2016, 04:19:44 AM
My point is if they have no clue where they are headed marketing wise.



Coming from the person who brought us knife fork and plate coin.

Thanks for proving me correct.

Graphic arts is not marketing. Try rereading my post to understand that I pointed out Linux's marketing was the identification of a synergy with a natural need of corporations to replace proprietary operating systems. Monero's current technology does not synergize with corporations and private block chains for corporations is the only viable (legal) market I see for anonymity. Thus Monero has failed to do the most basic marketing analysis that one does before starting a project. Those who confuse marketing with promotion exemplify their total lack of knowledge of the field of marketing.

As you well know I explained in the Aeon thread that I was brainstorming and produced that image in 30 seconds as a way to exemplify what didn't work visually and why.

Monero/Aeon community only know how to attack and never to listen, learn, and be receptive to all open source input. That is why your coin projects will crash and burn.

Cryptodromeda's point may be that you miss the obvious sometimes. And design work is part of marketing.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 22, 2016, 03:52:23 AM
My point is if they have no clue where they are headed marketing wise.



Coming from the person who brought us knife fork and plate coin.

Thanks for proving me correct.

Graphic arts is not marketing. Try rereading my post to understand that I pointed out Linux's marketing was the identification of a synergy with a natural need of corporations to replace proprietary operating systems. Monero's current technology does not synergize with corporations and private block chains for corporations is the only viable (legal) market I see for anonymity. Thus Monero has failed to do the most basic marketing analysis that one does before starting a project. Those who confuse marketing with promotion exemplify their total lack of knowledge of the field of marketing.

As you well know I explained in the Aeon thread that I was brainstorming and produced that image in 30 seconds as a way to exemplify what didn't work visually and why.

Monero/Aeon community only know how to attack and never to listen, learn, and be receptive to all open source input. That is why your coin projects will crash and burn.
full member
Activity: 212
Merit: 100
January 22, 2016, 03:39:07 AM
My point is if they have no clue where they are headed marketing wise.



Coming from the person who brought us knife fork and plate coin.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 22, 2016, 03:19:32 AM
The Monero Devs are developing the tech first, market second and are using the motto of "under promise and over deliver," whereas it seems you are working under the motto of "Over promise, say it's impossible and then move onto the next idea," which is still better than the dash motto, "Over promise and say you've got a better idea when most people figure out that you lied or can't deliver."

My point is if they have no clue where they are headed marketing wise, then the  tech is likely to be wrong. And I think that has become the case. I see a complete rewrite will be necessary to adopt Zerocash technology and to fix the block scaling, mining Tragedy of the Commons.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
January 22, 2016, 01:18:58 AM
I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.

I personally would prefer to read the transcript than your one-sided summary of what transpired. Plz don't be offended. If you can't produce it, then it didn't happen.

I edited my last comment.. i re-offer my deal with you guys Wink

And i will see if i can dig up that IRC log and put it on paste bin or something maybe.
I didn't think anyone would want to read a looong argument between me and smooth  Cheesy

EDIT:

The previously mentioned chat log with smooth from IRC 2 days ago..

http://pastebin.com/V5EUay2u




Some people just don't agree with you or your methods, not sure why you have to plaster 5 threads about it.

The comments from that transcript that stuck out for me are:

Quote
[02:21] you know who else fucking donated to help support development?Huh
00[02:21] ifi wanted to bury your crew i would eh
[02:21] me, you idiot
[02:21] and most of the other developers
00[02:22] all i would have to do is compare you comments from round 1 to round 2
[02:22] out of our own fucking pockets

I believe the Monero/Aeon folks put a lot of their effort, time, and money into Monero. I sincerely feel empathy for them when reading that. I know from my own failures, how painful it is to have to admit that such enthusiasm didn't work out as planned. Being able to take the axe to the desks as I once did, walk away and start fresh is much more efficient than hanging on to the umbilical cord until the placenta has dried and shrivelled into shoe leather.

It is difficult for me to only feel empathy, because their entire overriding philosophy of dominating a sector by stealingadopting Bytecoin's source code and then bashing in anyone's head who tried to argue that the model of socialism they were adopting for a business model was deeply flawed.

I have now come to the conclusion that these are guys who are smart in coding, and had some experience at running businesses or being contractors related to computer programming but when they hatched this braindead idea of Monero they were trying some idealistic fantasy and out-of-their-competency/experience level. Perhaps some of these guys have contributed to the Linux kernel or otherwise felt they understood open source development and could apply it here. One of the key differences from Linux is that crypto currency serves primarily speculators unless one invents a design to serve actual adoption markets. Linux was competing over the long-term with proprietary OSes and so many businesses had a compelling interest to fund and join in its development.

I have tried to explain to Monero that until they get an adoption market targeted to businesses (given they have no chance in hell of marketing directly to the masses, because their historical experience makes them unqualified), then they will not be able to apply the Linux business model and instead will be in this circle-jerk business model of greater fool, zero-sum speculation community morass that causes them to feel they need to ill-treat other developers and marketers such as myself. The brow beating and censorship on forums will never inspire great innovators to join them.

All-in-all I want to emphasize I don't dislike smooth. He helped me and has been enormously empathetic to my illness. I don't wish any ill will or outcome for him. I just have concluded that he and I have different areas of expertise and experience and so much so that it makes us incompatible when evaluating the best vision for running a crypto project.

The Monero Devs are developing the tech first, market second and are using the motto of "under promise and over deliver," whereas it seems you are working under the motto of "Over promise, say it's impossible and then move onto the next idea," which is still better than the dash motto, "Over promise and say you've got a better idea when most people figure out that you lied or can't deliver."
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 21, 2016, 10:51:44 PM
I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.

I personally would prefer to read the transcript than your one-sided summary of what transpired. Plz don't be offended. If you can't produce it, then it didn't happen.

I edited my last comment.. i re-offer my deal with you guys Wink

And i will see if i can dig up that IRC log and put it on paste bin or something maybe.
I didn't think anyone would want to read a looong argument between me and smooth  Cheesy

EDIT:

The previously mentioned chat log with smooth from IRC 2 days ago..

http://pastebin.com/V5EUay2u

The comments from that transcript that stuck out for me are:

Quote
[02:21] you know who else fucking donated to help support development?Huh
00[02:21] ifi wanted to bury your crew i would eh
[02:21] me, you idiot
[02:21] and most of the other developers
00[02:22] all i would have to do is compare you comments from round 1 to round 2
[02:22] out of our own fucking pockets

I believe the Monero/Aeon folks put a lot of their effort, time, and money into Monero. I sincerely feel empathy for them when reading that. I know from my own failures, how painful it is to have to admit that such enthusiasm didn't work out as planned. Being able to take the axe to the desks as I once did, walk away and start fresh is much more efficient than hanging on to the umbilical cord until the placenta has dried and shrivelled into shoe leather.

It is difficult for me to only feel empathy, because their entire overriding philosophy of dominating a sector by stealingadopting Bytecoin's source code and then bashing in anyone's head who tried to argue that the model of socialism they were adopting for a business model was deeply flawed.

I have now come to the conclusion that these are guys who are smart in coding, and had some experience at running businesses or being contractors related to computer programming but when they hatched this braindead idea of Monero they were trying some idealistic fantasy and out-of-their-competency/experience level. Perhaps some of these guys have contributed to the Linux kernel or otherwise felt they understood open source development and could apply it here. One of the key differences from Linux is that crypto currency serves primarily speculators unless one invents a design to serve actual adoption markets. Linux was competing over the long-term with proprietary OSes and so many businesses had a compelling interest to fund and join in its development.

I have tried to explain to Monero that until they get an adoption market targeted to businesses (given they have no chance in hell of marketing directly to the masses, because their historical experience makes them unqualified), then they will not be able to apply the Linux business model and instead will be in this circle-jerk business model of greater fool, zero-sum speculation community morass that causes them to feel they need to ill-treat other developers and marketers such as myself. The brow beating and censorship on forums will never inspire great innovators to join them.

All-in-all I want to emphasize I don't dislike smooth. He helped me and has been enormously empathetic to my illness. I don't wish any ill will or outcome for him. I just have concluded that he and I have different areas of expertise and experience and so much so that it makes us incompatible when evaluating the best vision for running a crypto project.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 21, 2016, 10:19:27 PM



That works well when no one has any incentive to convince speculators where to give their money away.

Smooth is demanding that I post my marketing thoughts in a separate thread from my technical thoughts, breaking the conversation continuity up across multi-threads. It was not my desire to post again in this Monero Speculation thread, but it is only official Monero thread I am aware where I can post marketing thoughts that impact speculation decisions on Monero. Where on BCT is the official Monero thread for having open discussions?


Quote
"build it and they will come after 5 years" is a nice pitch to speculators, but in my line of work I had to produce a marketed product to earn an income. You worked in (programming for) finance (something you acknowledged recently in public post) thus  I assume you never had to do this. So I understand that in for-profit software the mantra is "ship it, sell it", otherwise projects go on and on and on and are never finished.

Again consistent with take a break and come back when the technology is ready for a "build it, ship it, sell it" approach.

Also this is entirely irrelevant to Monero since Monero is an open source project not a product. So off topic for the thread. Please respect the thread starter, the forum, and the community and try to stay on topic.

Open source that goes on and on and doesn't full a market thus dies. Right now you are fighting to keep the speculators fooled as that is the only market.

Why the desire to censor? Hiding something? It is not off topic. Technological and marketing analysis go hand-in-hand.

There was nothing on-topic ("Improvement Technical Discussion") in your last post, thus no need for any further response. Please stay on topic.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1100
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 21, 2016, 10:09:11 PM

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
January 21, 2016, 08:19:43 PM
I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.

I personally would prefer to read the transcript than your one-sided summary of what transpired. Plz don't be offended. If you can't produce it, then it didn't happen.

I can confirm that the chat happened, and in a brief glance at the transcript it looked authentic. I can't confirm that it wasn't edited at all.


You act like an idiot and bury your self time after time man.

What i said was FACT.

take the BCX point i brought up (mentioned in the chat log)
It went down exactly as i said.. and i will repeat Wink
All you had to do was say "i don't recall that" etc
Instead you went on calling me a liar.. again !

I *can* simply go dig up the old Monero topic here and quote BCX if i need to.
I guess i should eh ?
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
January 21, 2016, 08:12:28 PM
I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.

I personally would prefer to read the transcript than your one-sided summary of what transpired. Plz don't be offended. If you can't produce it, then it didn't happen.

I can confirm that the chat happened, and in a brief glance at the transcript it looked authentic. I can't confirm that it wasn't edited at all.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
January 21, 2016, 08:11:15 PM
Such as BitcoinEXpress's dram with Monero like 1.5 years back..
And on that point smooth didn't just say well, i don;t recall any of that story etc.
Nope.. he blindly went on to call me a liar etc.

You are a liar. You insisted that BCX fixed the coin, when no such thing happened (all that happened was FUD).

Every time you post about this stuff you lie more.


quoted so you an not edit on your lies Wink

my edit with proof contradicts you Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
January 21, 2016, 08:04:12 PM
Such as BitcoinEXpress's dram with Monero like 1.5 years back..
And on that point smooth didn't just say well, i don;t recall any of that story etc.
Nope.. he blindly went on to call me a liar etc.

You are a liar. You insisted that BCX fixed the coin, when no such thing happened (all that happened was FUD).

Every time you post about this stuff you lie more.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
January 21, 2016, 07:52:43 PM
I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.

I personally would prefer to read the transcript than your one-sided summary of what transpired. Plz don't be offended. If you can't produce it, then it didn't happen.

I edited my last comment.. i re-offer my deal with you guys Wink

And i will see if i can dig up that IRC log and put it on paste bin or something maybe.
I didn't think anyone would want to read a looong argument between me and smooth  Cheesy

EDIT:

The previously mentioned chat log with smooth from IRC 2 days ago..

http://pastebin.com/V5EUay2u
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 21, 2016, 07:46:40 PM
I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.

I personally would prefer to read the transcript than your one-sided summary of what transpired. Plz don't be offended. If you can't produce it, then it didn't happen.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
January 21, 2016, 07:42:31 PM
That Monero speculation topic needs to be deleted.

And now i see they are bumping another one too !

This scam coin is bullshit.
I had a rather large discussion with "smooth" on IRC
and i forgot just how immature and dishonest these guys are.
I felt like i was arguing about Stakeminers with Terrik.
And then to make matters worse..
2 guys who didn't like me had to try and jump in to White Knight for that fag.

It ended up being 3 guys hopping from attack angle to another with me squashing them over & over.


I can post the IRC log but it's long and rather pointless.
Smooth simply sat their denying as much as possible while playing dumb.. AKA: The usual.
As i rattled odd point after point..
Such as BitcoinEXpress's dram with Monero like 1.5 years back..
And on that point smooth didn't just say well, i don;t recall any of that story etc.
Nope.. he blindly went on to call me a liar etc.
I had to laugh because this idiot either know NOTHING about Monero or he is -THAT- dishonest
take your pic guys.

Monero is a scammy load of bullshit pushed by Fraudsters and a lunatic millionaire guy feeding them.

EDIT:
I will also re-offer
..to lay off them if they stop spamming that 1 "Speculation" topic 24/7 to the top of page one !
I told them lock it and stop the bullshit and don't just spam another one and i will try and lay off them.
I had looked a LOT on that topic now for damn near 2 years and 90% of the time,
they simply used that topic as MSN Chat !
That whole topic is giant giant charade fro Monero Cheerleaders to get the words in their topic title bumped to page 1
Don't believe me ?
Did you guys see how hardcore they flipped out on me over the David Latapie French Police Fraud topic ?
I asked smooth on IRC other day why smooth + smoothie left me 4 beg ratings at once..
And i already knew.. it was because of that topic.. but he confirmed it (he had no choice)
He said.. because of the TOPIC TITLE.
topic Titles seem to be utterly tantamount to their "marketing" campaign antics & shenanigans.
Coming from the idiots who said this forum sucks & their leaving almost 2 years ago (they never did)
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
January 21, 2016, 04:19:42 PM
I have no project for the readers to invest in, so the topic of the thread is nonsense.

If this is a forward looking question, assuming that I might produce a project, then I will not involve myself in discussions of the probabilities surrounding vaporware.

My intuition is that the purpose of this thread is to try to collect and manipulate public opinion, and this is apparently already well documented tactic of the Monero (and now apparently by association the Aeon) clan.

I would much prefer to discuss technological and marketing solutions for our goals in crypto currency. Thus I don't think I will be participating in this thread. Time waster.

I would much prefer to discuss technological and marketing solutions for our goals in crypto currency. Thus I don't think I will be participating in this thread. Time waster.

My guess is that AmericanPegasus started this thread as an attempt at comedy and not for any other nefarious purpose.  I won't spend more time in this thread either but I do not assume ill intent. There are many people in the Monero and Aeon communities who value the contributions of TPTB.

Okay my bad. Humor is most welcome at this juncture (and even if but not iff I am the butt of the joke).
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
January 21, 2016, 07:57:14 AM
reverse trolling  Shocked....
honestly, if this is a reverse trolling and the merchant end up comply with anon threat without any announcement, what does the troll gaining?


EDIT: referring to the Monero Marketing Team and tactics thread I refuse to bump in case that wasn't obvious

I was threatened and received unfair and spiteful censorship in the two official Monero threads, so I was forced to copy my posts to a thread where the Monero gulag doesn't have the ability to delete my posts.

Seems that troll thread is factually correct on some of the controlling and manipulative tactics employed by the Monero community. I haven't read the entire thread, so I can't say if I agree with everything written there.

If that is your objectivity, I don't see what I could gain from your contribution to my work. Sounds like you would just bog my work down with needless political nonsense. I will never be a bitch to some community political morass. I will stay focused on getting the technology and marketing correct, if I continue in crypto. I have no idea what you all are doing in Monero. Seems like you all excel and put inordinate effort into patting yourselves on the back and boasting about how great you are and how you have the best devs and it is inevitable that you will win the long-term race because you have the best community and all that pumped up ego shit delusion.
Were they nasty to you? Well they are nasty people. You are most welcome here, friend.

well we remember how monero bag holder bully and intimidate to to get what they want, so  monero ppl threaten TPTB is not a big surprise here
https://www.bolehvpn.net/blog/2015/12/14/what-is-dash-and-why-is-bolehvpn-accepting-it/

Quote
Monero (No.13 in market capitalization) is promising and has better anonymity but it still lacks an official GUI client though there are third party GUI options available. [SEE UPDATE BELOW] More importantly, I have personally witnessed many of Monero’s representatives employing questionable marketing tactics that often involve trolling and bullying and as such we have decided not to accept it at this point in time as a matter of principle. We even received a strongly worded anonymous warning to threaten to boycott and spread negative publicity about us if we continued to accept Dash. We strongly believe in healthy competition and hope that Monero’s official team takes a stronger stance in regulating its spokespersons (even if they may be on paper unofficial). We look forward to accepting Monero once these problems are rectified.

"We even received a strongly worded anonymous warning to threaten to boycott and spread negative publicity about us if we continued to accept Dash. "

Wow, that is just horrible. Whichever 'proponent' of monero that was should be very ashamed of himself. If it happened to be a reverse troll, that's even lower. (Since it was an anonymous threat it can't be discounted. Nasty tactics on both sides are being used)

Anyways, I wish this whole childish ridiculous battle could just come to an end. It's counter productive for both parties, and frankly makes us all look bad. See the response of the the merchant above. Luckily he took the effort to join the IRC-channel which resolved it more or less, but I can imagine other people being totally put off by this kind of shit.

Quote
I had a pleasant chat with some of the Monero community in their IRC channel and hopefully it’s the action of a few individuals rather than a big proportion of the community and it is unfair of us to make generalizations of the entire community from a handful of bad experiences (be it personal). We however hope that Monero could issue out a public notice that such marketing/messages are frowned upon to distance themselves from such unhealthy behaviour that is affecting their brand. We will look into accepting Monero once we can figure out a way to charge Monero in USD terms automatically.

I have my preferred project, others have theirs. Big fucking deal. Criticism is ok, but these guerilla wartactics are just retarded.
Pages:
Jump to: