Pages:
Author

Topic: Null input error - page 4. (Read 58196 times)

legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
May 16, 2016, 05:11:03 PM
Exploit 13 (v2 block) was found and reported by John Connor to monero devs months ago.
...
smooth to slander JC and Vcash

False. Nothing was ever "reported" by him to us, and I haven't see anything anywhere from him about Monero bugs until after it was already public.

He didn't "save Monero." The issue with v2 blocks was discovered when it happened by moneromooo or luigi (I don't remember which) and we worked together along with fluffypony to deploy a fix. He's claiming credit for something he had nothing to do with.

You can't slander someone when your statements are correct, well documented, and relevant to their public actions. Evidence supporting my statements about him ripping off the Bitcoin code and falsely claiming credit for writing it himself are here (mostly quoting uninvolved third parties). The claim of slander is ridiculous.

If you can find some statement of mine that is incorrect let me know and I'll correct it.

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
May 16, 2016, 04:23:38 PM
Exploit 13 (v2 block) was found and reported by John Connor to monero devs months ago.
...
smooth to slander JC and Vcash

False. Nothing was ever "reported" by him to us, and I haven't see anything anywhere from him about Monero bugs until after it was already public.

He didn't "save Monero." The issue with v2 blocks was discovered when it happened by moneromooo or luigi (I don't remember which) and we worked together along with fluffypony to deploy a fix. He's claiming credit for something he had nothing to do with.

You can't slander someone when your statements are correct, well documented, and relevant to their public actions. Evidence supporting my statements about him ripping off the Bitcoin code and falsely claiming credit for writing it himself are here (mostly quoting uninvolved third parties). The claim of slander is ridiculous.

If you can find some statement of mine that is incorrect let me know and I'll correct it.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
May 16, 2016, 03:48:46 PM
Now, after a new thread was created by smooth to slander JC and Vcash, he found other 12 zeroday exploits.
Do you really think he will help monero community again?

I hope not. Maybe it is time to dump the exploits in a zero day exploit database https://www.exploit-db.com/
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
May 16, 2016, 03:43:25 PM
Exploit 13 (v2 block) was found and reported by John Connor to monero devs months ago.
Even after the devs and trolls from monero community try to destroy Vcash with fud and lies, John Connor informed the exploit because he thought that would be able to make the worms stop with their slanders.
Well, he saved monero once the problem was solved, but after this the trolls and fudders unscrupulous and without ethics back to attack him again
Now, after a new thread was created by smooth to slander JC and Vcash, he found other 12 zeroday exploits.
Do you really think he will help monero community again?
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
May 15, 2016, 07:55:57 PM
...
No i was asking a question i got an answer that tweet is fake that attack happend 4 months ago and the GUI is not till 2026 or something they said

Not your post. That was a genuine question. There is a lot of FUD around Monero and some of it is starting to sound very desperate.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
May 15, 2016, 07:52:12 PM
...

I sense some kind of desperation by the number of threads where the above has been posted. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14861139
No i was asking a question i got an answer that tweet is fake that attack happend 4 months ago and the GUI is not till 2026 or something they said
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
May 15, 2016, 07:40:46 PM
...

I sense some kind of desperation by the number of threads where the above has been posted. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14861139
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
May 15, 2016, 06:38:36 PM
Monero is a wonderful community of braggart assholes:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-speculation-753252
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
May 15, 2016, 06:28:08 PM
A Monero bash thread....i'm in. Maybe they learn to stop bashing others. Monero supporters need to know they are destroying their own coin by fudding other coins with fake facts. Why not respect others? Do you really think you earn respect and total adoption of your own coin by disrespecting others?

I'm out!
sr. member
Activity: 514
Merit: 258
May 12, 2016, 03:42:36 AM
riddle me this.... what exactly are the "things that happened" that i say did not happen.
seems like vague accusations with no discernible articulable facts for me to dispute.

Euuh, not sure if you actually read the topic you've started, but all the things you said were pretty much totally debunked in the postings after the one I quoted...

so I guess yes, you're not to be trusted in any way cuz you peddle fiction to further your own financial cause... please, don't expect me to repeat everything that's stated in there...


why oh why am I wasting my time on this again?

good luck with Dash Nation, Dash Dalmation, Evolution, whatever else your fantastic multi-trick pony is doing, though mixing coins seems to take an eternity: http://blog.makemoneywhileyouwork.com/2016/01/11/using-alt-coins-to-mix-bitcoins/

best regards
legendary
Activity: 1182
Merit: 1000
May 11, 2016, 06:49:51 PM

@Mastermined: third post out of your topic you're quoting:


I have not looked into monero. The things he claims "could" be true


He now tries to deny things that happened  actually happened  on that launch. He is not to be trusted.


well played sir!

best regards

 Huh
ahhh thank you? not sure what you are trying to say but ok.

riddle me this.... what exactly are the "things that happened" that i say did not happen.
seems like vague accusations with no discernible articulable facts for me to dispute.

the topic of the thread you quoted him from was "Why the bitmonero/monero Ninjalaunched Cripplemined Fastmine matters". that thread has nothing to do with the dash instamine so i'm not even sure what he is talking about. please try and stay on topic.
sr. member
Activity: 514
Merit: 258
May 11, 2016, 02:50:00 AM

@Mastermined: third post out of your topic you're quoting:

This is on topic.

I have not looked into monero. The things he claims "could" be true

HOWEVER - i would not trust one word mastermined710 says.

I was on the xcoin(dash) captive instamine launch. I was there in real time and watched it unfold.

He now tries to deny things that happened  actually happened  on that launch. He is not to be trusted.

Although, this is not a dash/xcoin/dark thread I will not go into it here. I will only say if you want examples of his lies then please contact me for details.

This person is either a total scammer or likes to try and destroy the truth with nuances that are laughable. His tactic is to say he is telling the truth so that the real truth that is a correct and proper picture is distorted and cast in doubt.

He is making this thread only to divert from the dash scam thread.

He is a scam protector and pumper.

well played sir!

best regards
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
May 11, 2016, 02:12:07 AM
But we already knew DashHoles aren't exactly the brightest stars in the altcoin galaxy.   Roll Eyes


Another epic fail by the monero marketing FUD team....



http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in

Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general

The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.

Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.

In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.

This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.



...

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.

Coins have nothing to do with voting.  Nothing at all.
Coins may stay safely locked down and votes can still be cast.
These potential security concerns have been solved long ago.
Thanks to Evan, Dash is three steps ahead.


#REKT

It doesn't solve the problem of centralization though. The only way you can do that is to openly redistribute the instamined coins and get rid of the aggregation of coins on masternodes--two things that will likely never happen. But I'm sure you'll add more layers of complexity to the problem in a vain attempt to stay a few steps ahead of criticism. But unless you do the two things I outlined, you will miss the core problem of centralization and any "fixes" will be lip stick on a pig.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14601018

 Roll Eyes

there is no centralization problem, your problem is with free market capitalism. the biggest dash holder bought his coins on the free market while you were wasting money on monero or some other coin that did not perform well, that's your own fault.
 the instamine does not affect anything anymore, no more than the monero cripplemine or btc's early distribution. the biggest fear early on with the instamine was that someone would dump a bunch of coins and crashing the price, that time has now passed.

the ~400k cryptsy theft and slow dump affected the price more than anything (thanks for the cheap coins). as soon as those coins ran out around november the price slowly tripled. before that there was the mintpal dump from moolah alex green's hackery and even before that there was another exchange that was hacked early on and a bunch of coins that were dumped. lol, you had so many chances to buy cheap coins but failed and now you are butthurt.
the monero cripplemine and the dash instamine are both old news and i don't think either effects the coins anymore. however the dash instamine was accidental and the monero crippledminer was a scam by corrupt devs.

the 11.8 million monero fastmine is the main problem. due to the double whammy of the cripplemine and fastmine y'all should just restart monero with a fair emission curve and non crippledminer. oh and a official GUI wallet would be nice too. Wink

i wouldn't waste my time however as monero (one trick pony) will soon be replaced by zcash or something similar. dump now, thank me later!

Why the bitmonero/monero Ninjalaunched Cripplemined Fastmine matters
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-the-monerobitmoneromrobmrxmr-ninjalaunched-cripplemined-fastmine-matters-1435385


So you want us to believe that the instaminers (not that that's the whole issue with centralization--masternodes being the other part) not only sold "all" their coins, but also didn't engage in market manipulation to gain more cheap coins? And further, you want us to believe they didn't design benefits into the coin for coin hodling and didn't take advantage of the very benefits they designed into the coin?



legendary
Activity: 1182
Merit: 1000
May 11, 2016, 02:01:32 AM
But we already knew DashHoles aren't exactly the brightest stars in the altcoin galaxy.   Roll Eyes


Another epic fail by the monero marketing FUD team....



http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in

Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general

The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.

Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.

In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.

This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.



...

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.

Coins have nothing to do with voting.  Nothing at all.
Coins may stay safely locked down and votes can still be cast.
These potential security concerns have been solved long ago.
Thanks to Evan, Dash is three steps ahead.


#REKT

It doesn't solve the problem of centralization though. The only way you can do that is to openly redistribute the instamined coins and get rid of the aggregation of coins on masternodes--two things that will likely never happen. But I'm sure you'll add more layers of complexity to the problem in a vain attempt to stay a few steps ahead of criticism. But unless you do the two things I outlined, you will miss the core problem of centralization and any "fixes" will be lip stick on a pig.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14601018

 Roll Eyes

there is no centralization problem, your problem is with free market capitalism. the biggest dash holder bought his coins on the free market while you were wasting money on monero or some other coin that did not perform well, that's your own fault.
 the instamine does not affect anything anymore, no more than the monero cripplemine or btc's early distribution. the biggest fear early on with the instamine was that someone would dump a bunch of coins and crashing the price, that time has now passed.

the ~400k cryptsy theft and slow dump affected the price more than anything (thanks for the cheap coins). as soon as those coins ran out around november the price slowly tripled. before that there was the mintpal dump from moolah alex green's hackery and even before that there was another exchange that was hacked early on and a bunch of coins that were dumped. lol, you had so many chances to buy cheap coins but failed and now you are butthurt.
the monero cripplemine and the dash instamine are both old news and i don't think either effects the coins anymore. however the dash instamine was accidental and the monero crippledminer was a scam by corrupt devs.

the 11.8 million monero fastmine is the main problem. due to the double whammy of the cripplemine and fastmine y'all should just restart monero with a fair emission curve and non crippledminer. oh and a official GUI wallet would be nice too. Wink

i wouldn't waste my time however as monero (one trick pony) will soon be replaced by zcash or something similar. dump now, thank me later!

Why the bitmonero/monero Ninjalaunched Cripplemined Fastmine matters
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-the-monerobitmoneromrobmrxmr-ninjalaunched-cripplemined-fastmine-matters-1435385
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
May 11, 2016, 12:51:23 AM
But we already knew DashHoles aren't exactly the brightest stars in the altcoin galaxy.   Roll Eyes


Another epic fail by the monero marketing FUD team....



http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in

Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general

The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.

Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.

In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.

This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.



...

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.

Coins have nothing to do with voting.  Nothing at all.
Coins may stay safely locked down and votes can still be cast.
These potential security concerns have been solved long ago.
Thanks to Evan, Dash is three steps ahead.


#REKT

It doesn't solve the problem of centralization though. The only way you can do that is to openly redistribute the instamined coins and get rid of the aggregation of coins on masternodes--two things that will likely never happen. But I'm sure you'll add more layers of complexity to the problem in a vain attempt to stay a few steps ahead of criticism. But unless you do the two things I outlined, you will miss the core problem of centralization and any "fixes" will be lip stick on a pig.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14601018

EDIT: you could also limit the node aggregation to a very small fee (much tinier than the 10%-50% APR currently) and redistribute the instamined coins and take all power functions away from masternode control--though the odds of these things happening are pretty slim to none as it would require Evan and his buddies owning up to the instamine and relinquishing the benefits.
legendary
Activity: 1182
Merit: 1000
May 10, 2016, 08:11:45 PM
But we already knew DashHoles aren't exactly the brightest stars in the altcoin galaxy.   Roll Eyes


Another epic fail by the monero marketing FUD team....



http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in

Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general

The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.

Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.

In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.

This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.



...

off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.

Coins have nothing to do with voting.  Nothing at all.
Coins may stay safely locked down and votes can still be cast.
These potential security concerns have been solved long ago.
Thanks to Evan, Dash is three steps ahead.


#REKT
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
May 10, 2016, 05:56:20 PM

TIL ceti can't even the difference between self-moderated threads and not.   Grin

But we already knew DashHoles aren't exactly the brightest stars in the altcoin galaxy.   Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
May 09, 2016, 08:39:31 PM
...
No, wrong, it's moderated son, we all know that.

Jesus your a retard. go back and hang with the pre-teens boy.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
May 09, 2016, 04:59:38 PM
i wonder why xmr development were focused on thing that we cannot see such " increase of anonimity " Huh arent their coin anon already Huh how would we rate their improvement Huh 


sound like a bunch of hot air to me LOL

Nice concern trolling, but I think you missed the memo that would have told you that anonymity, like fungibility, isn't a yes/no proposition in cryptosystems, but a more/less proposition. Thankfully the Monero team has cryptographers that are actively working to reduce or eliminate attack vectors, in this case with I2p developers. Would you like to dig a deeper hole and second guess I2p developers too?  Roll Eyes

https://github.com/monero-project/kovri



Trolling ?
Well lets put this into perspective shall we ?
Notice how this topic is NOT self-moderated ?
Now let's go look at all the Monero topics  Roll Eyes

The main Monero thread is not self-moderated: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-a-secure-private-untraceable-cryptocurrency-583449

The topic discussion threads are very lightly moderated for the purpose of keeping those threads on topic. For example, I can't remember the last time any posts on the mining or support threads were moderated (maybe never). On the speculation thread it happens occasionally (typically every few weeks) and when I do so, I quote the offending post in 1pt type, so anyone can still see the deleted post and is free to criticize my moderation as biased. For some strange reason that never happens.

No, wrong, it's moderated son, we all know that.

The main Monero thread is not self-moderated: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-a-secure-private-untraceable-cryptocurrency-583449



sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
May 09, 2016, 04:34:34 AM
Marketing without official GUI wallet can only exist in Monero ninja miners dream. You should do more. Dan don't exist here.Steem it up baby. To much Moneros in your pocket Smiley. They are now worthless.
Pages:
Jump to: