I'm a speculator of course. But I do install and test wallets, wanna send some to corroborate? What does that have to do with the matters at hand and with the fact that NXT/Ardor is a very small side show market valuewise with respect to Ethereum?
As thing are NXT is just a meaningless anecdote compared to the the Ethereum universe. To even pretend that NXT or any evolution of it, will be superior in any way is just absurd lip service impossible to corroborate for the sheer volume of transactions in one network and the other are light years apart.
But I am not here t sing the hallelujahs of Ethereum, but to state the limitations of Nxt/ardor... beyond it's technology, that I accept as valid and viable. The problem is adoption. And the fact is that unfortunately, it remains stagnant, even in this golden era of fiat investment in the crypto world, so pretending the tech is superior, which is arguable at best, bears no relevance to that fact.
NXT is proven technology and stable already for YEARS, almost never had problems, the originator of POS and shuffle, and many features,
most of their roadmap is completed (of which all its ideas being followed by all the others AGAIN)
the founder didn't greedy to take as many bitcoin he could do if compared to all the other ICO, because when it reach 21btc it's stopped(none of us understand why he do that), at that time all the other ico takes 7000 or more bitcoins.
what do you expect 21btc could do in terms of marketing? (it was 1btc = 200usd before)
and look... with that funding it proofs NXT still alive and kicking, and be respected, be the most copied coins by many other projects (they tweak and rebrand NXT)
this also raise questions to all the others with huge fundings, seems lots of money never the solutions? NXT do have very committed developers