Would the source code help u to come to a conclusion if it's imitation or not?
Yes, of course, the full and uncut source code proving these advanced features and an actual difference from BTC would prove me wrong. And I would be happy to be proved wrong.
Judging by the talk over at nxt forum, it does seem that the source code isn't going to be released though, not fully. That almost solidifies the doubt for me now.
As I said over on Nxt forum, if I wanted to try and scam people out of BTC, it would be easy to create a really basic coin and really basic interface (full of bugs) with the promise of so much more hidden in the source code, all to come in the not to distant future.
But, before it comes, let's sell off this coin at a rate equal to 6000 BTC for the whole lot.
The little bit of source code there is will be released in dribs and drabs to try to keep interest alive whilst the inital stock is sold.
Once interest fades or anger arises from the lack of transparency, it's too late, there will have been hundreds of BTC invested, the creator has had his money, everyone else loses theirs as the coin collapses.
well, miztaziggy. looks like you have some experiences in this.
your detailed presentation here how it *could* be, tells more about *you* than you think.
hopefully you don't get the sources to early into your hands.
miztaziggy is simply asking questions and raising concerns. what is wrong with that?
if you got solid stuff, why don't you lay your arguments here instead of bashing?