But if some points, this venture become too disarrayed and too fragmented that BCNext has to appear and decide everything then I will leave because because all my efforts have been fruitless. Up until that point, if you care about NXT, then giving up the habit of looking up for a leader and actually doing something. You yourself could actually shape the vision for NXT.
This is so vague....what does "decentralization and community involvement" mean to you?
Apparently, it means voting on Nxt-related things.
So how many people need to vote to satisfy your criterion of "community involvement?"
Would 20% of NXTholders be enough? 50%? What if voter participation was almost completely from the top 10 percentile of Nxt holders, and the people holding a couple thousand NXT just sat out the election?
I think part of the problem we're having with voting is that info about this project is scattered over 3 forums (here, nextcoin.org and nxtcrypto.org) and there is no organization.
As I said in a previous post, I've been following this with some effort for about 10 days now, and I still am ignorant of a lot of important things.
- Who is Jean-Luc and what does he do?
- Is BCNext still involved in programming and development.
- What do Utopian Future, Klee, Anon, 2Kewl4School and other prolific posters do? Do they program stuff? Write articles?
- Where do you go to get reliable technical answers about the protocol?
- How many developers are there currently working on the full source code? Who are they?
Information is too fragmented, or scattered through this 900-page thread. I got interested in NXT in late December, and there's really no way to get caught up on the status of the project.
Yes I have read the wiki, white paper, and I hang out in #nxtalk, but I am still uninformed.
And you want me to vote.
I would vote and participate but really, there is no way to get caught up on the project for someone coming on board now and that hasn't been here since the beginning.
+10000000
+1M
The more de-centralized this gets, the more coordination is paramount.
Decentralization in theory is not equal to decentralization in practice. Projects need leadership and direction.