Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1651. (Read 2761645 times)

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
I hope you all know that exchanges and pools will have huge advantage in this.

Pools having an advantage may not be a bad thing.  This is one to ponder.

As for exchanges: they will become less powerful once distributed exchange is implemented and everyone can be their own exchange.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
Shit dgex down again...

I just logged in...seems fine
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Shit dgex down again...
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 504
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Cross posted from: https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=530&p=2612#p2612

My thoughts on how to count votes.

Personally I think the most democratic way is 1 Account = 1 Vote, regardless of your wealth (amount of NXT). Sure someone could create multiple accounts to have more votes but since it costs NXT to send NXT to other accounts, you couldn't do this for long without going broke.

Imagine I have 10,000 NXT. I can't create 10,000 accounts. At most I could create 5,000. Since if I send 1NXT to 5,000 accounts it costs me 5,000 NXT in transaction fees just to do so. If I want those NXT all back in one account (to increase ability to forge) then I can create even less accounts since I will incur a transaction fee to send NXT from those dummy accounts back to my main account.

This can actually work well early on since it may help to distribute NXT even more.

Another way to prevent the creation of dummy voting accounts would be to have a rule that NXT must remain in an account for a certain number of blocks before a vote to be counted as a valid voting account. Or say for example if a vote comes up at block 45,000 for example, only accounts that have a balance as of block 45,000 are counted for voting.

I think the coolest part about the voting is that we can use the voting system to tweak the voting system as time goes on. We could come up with all sorts of complex algorithms in the future once we see what the NXT ecosystem looks like.

Any ideas?

Edit: Or maybe even, 1 Account = 1 Vote but it costs 1NXT per account to vote.



For some people it's not a problem to create 100 000 accounts just for voting. Also I hate the idea 1 person - 1 vote.

I was thinking of doing something like that:
1 Nxt - 1 Vote
100 Nxt - 100 Votes
1000 Nxt - 800 Votes
10 000 Nxt -7000 Votes
100 000 Nxt - 60 000 Votes
1 000 000 Nxt - 500 000 Votes
5 000 000 Nxt - 4 000 000 Votes
10 000 000 Nxt - 6 000 000 Votes


Is this possible:

1 vote = paying x% of owend coins

the fee will be devided between the x poorest accounts.

I have 1NXT fee for voting is 2% I pay 0.02NXT fee

I have 1,000,000 NXT I have to pay 20,000NXT

Pin


This will not stop a large holder from transferring 1 NXT to a large amount of accounts, then voting with those accounts to get around the fee. IMO 1 NXT = 1 vote is the simplest, least gamed method.
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
In terms of voting, I appreciate what you're trying to do with a 1 person == 1 vote, but... well... it just won't work.

I think it could but it does require a bit of "thinking outside of the box" - I could envision some sort of decentralised online *game* which you have to play in order to vote (you only get to vote when you finish the game).

If you limit the time window (and make the game something that might take an hour or so to complete) then I think you'd get close to 1 vote per person (you'll never get it 100% right).

It's really a question of whether a "democracy" is what is wanted or whether instead it should just be the largest stakeholders that make the decisions.

Maybe a better way is to simply *pay* for a vote - so if you want to vote 10K times it costs you 10K NXT (with the funds being used on whatever is being voted for I guess).


Yeah, I think in the end it's best if it's 1 Nxt - 1 Vote, keep it simple.

I hope you all know that exchanges and pools will have huge advantage in this.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
just a reminder please support Nxt on Cryptsy. Register and click "Do you like this idea?"

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/44434

I guess Cryptsy-support we have had more than enough within the last 3 weeks. Is not the main problem for adding Nxt to Cryptsy the not full available source code and the technical implemantation in general?
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
just a reminder please support Nxt on Cryptsy. Register and click "Do you like this idea?"

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/44434
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
Cross posted from: https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=530&p=2612#p2612

My thoughts on how to count votes.

Personally I think the most democratic way is 1 Account = 1 Vote, regardless of your wealth (amount of NXT). Sure someone could create multiple accounts to have more votes but since it costs NXT to send NXT to other accounts, you couldn't do this for long without going broke.

Imagine I have 10,000 NXT. I can't create 10,000 accounts. At most I could create 5,000. Since if I send 1NXT to 5,000 accounts it costs me 5,000 NXT in transaction fees just to do so. If I want those NXT all back in one account (to increase ability to forge) then I can create even less accounts since I will incur a transaction fee to send NXT from those dummy accounts back to my main account.

This can actually work well early on since it may help to distribute NXT even more.

Another way to prevent the creation of dummy voting accounts would be to have a rule that NXT must remain in an account for a certain number of blocks before a vote to be counted as a valid voting account. Or say for example if a vote comes up at block 45,000 for example, only accounts that have a balance as of block 45,000 are counted for voting.

I think the coolest part about the voting is that we can use the voting system to tweak the voting system as time goes on. We could come up with all sorts of complex algorithms in the future once we see what the NXT ecosystem looks like.

Any ideas?

Edit: Or maybe even, 1 Account = 1 Vote but it costs 1NXT per account to vote.



For some people it's not a problem to create 100 000 accounts just for voting. Also I hate the idea 1 person - 1 vote.

I was thinking of doing something like that:
1 Nxt - 1 Vote
100 Nxt - 100 Votes
1000 Nxt - 800 Votes
10 000 Nxt -7000 Votes
100 000 Nxt - 60 000 Votes
1 000 000 Nxt - 500 000 Votes
5 000 000 Nxt - 4 000 000 Votes
10 000 000 Nxt - 6 000 000 Votes


Is this possible:

1 vote = paying x% of owend coins

the fee will be devided between the x poorest accounts.

I have 1NXT fee for voting is 2% I pay 0.02NXT fee

I have 1,000,000 NXT I have to pay 20,000NXT

Pin
full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 100
I am selling 4 million nxt at 0.000045 each!

check my thread at

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/selling-400000000-nxt-at-0000045btc-each-399205

0.000045 or 0.000075? Smiley) the thread still says 0.000075
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
NXT is tooo expensive, 38 mil. market cap for premined starter up in pre-beta testing? Are you kidding? Adequate price for approving more people would be 10 times lower. At least 10 times.

You cannot imagine how low the price is right now. Remember the price of Bitcoin one year ago ? two years ago ?
You can buy NXT 10 times higher and still be making a profit on the long term.
It's up to you. No one force you to invest in anything.
If you're fine working in McDonald and giving your money to the bank for them to make a profit that's your choice.
Or you can invest right now in NXT and save yourself from worries about life and how tomorrow will be and stuff.

 Wink

(I'm kidding dude don't take it bad)
xgc
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
Number of Accounts with 1-10 Nxt = 7.352
Number of Accounts with 11-100 Nxt = 827
Number of Accounts with 101-1.000 Nxt = 1.236
Number of Accounts with 1.001-10.000 Nxt = 869
Number of Accounts with 10.001-100.000 Nxt = 718
Number of Accounts with 100.001-1.000.000 Nxt = 312
Number of Accounts with more than 1.000.000 Nxt = 122
Number of Accounts with more than 10.000.000 Nxt = 21
Number of Accounts with more than 30.000.000 Nxt = 6

This just made my day!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Voting is used for getting the opinion only.

Nice Grin A truly decentralized way of achieving consensus.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
What is a valid issue/topic for voting?

Anything.


Who can raise a vote?

Anyone.


How long must a poll take place to be considered valid?

The person who created a poll decides.


What information will be provided when a poll is opened?

The person who created a poll decides.


Who is responsible for providing this information?

Anyone or noone.


If a majority of voters lack technical knowledge and cannot be educated effectively in the polling time frame, is voting an effective method of decision-making?

Voting is used for getting the opinion only.


Who is responsible for initiating action once voting ends?

No actions required.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1003
Unlimited Free Crypto
I am selling 4 million nxt at 0.000045 each!

check my thread at

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/selling-400000000-nxt-at-0000045btc-each-399205
full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 100
noob question: my tx got only 5 confirmations after a week..is this something to be worry about ?

What is the transaction id? Also, are you basing your 5 confirmations on the block explorer or your actual client? I ask this only because I had a transaction stuck at 5 confirmations based on the blockexplorer, however, my client actually showed a much higher count. This stayed like this for a couple of days but now after checking the blockexplorer the count is correct now.

ohhh thanks. all good now. the block explorer was lagging i think lol
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
How about rules that revolve around voting? What is a valid issue/topic for voting? Who can raise a vote? How long must a poll take place to be considered valid? What information will be provided when a poll is opened? Who is responsible for providing this information? If a majority of voters lack technical knowledge and cannot be educated effectively in the polling time frame, is voting an effective method of decision-making? Who is responsible for initiating action once voting ends?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Is there an ETA for the voting system?

It will be launched before April.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Nxt is a psychological experiment in group dynamics as well as a cryptoplatform.

I agree, and I hope this experiment will succeed. Remember the "fun" game where we, as a community, had to choose 3 questions to ask BCNext? It wasn't really about getting answers, if you read CfB's announcement carefully, it was really about getting the community to come to an agreement on which 3 questions to ask.
Jump to: