I don't think anybody said, that the purpose of this was to promote child porn.
You can not to censure the channel
I do not want a big brother
I guess this sums up our dilemma.
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 325. (Read 2761650 times)
You can not to censure the channel
I do not want a big brother
I guess this sums up our dilemma.
I don't think anybody said, that the purpose of this was to promote child porn.
You can not to censure the channel
I do not want a big brother
intmain: I created a video about it: http://youtu.be/RtTWUwRL9mQ Nxt Decentralized Internet
Childporn was never my intention. I just want normal services like email and instant messaging without government spying.
I think we can all agree this is not the intention.
Let's keep that clearly in front of us
The reaction here also proves my point of how potent that one word is.
i don't like it, not one bit. There are enough darknet services now. why try to reinvent the wheel?
Because the current wheel is more of a rectangle than a circle. Do you know how easily the NSA can impersonate websites? The answer is very, very easily. Torbrowser is really slow, but incredibly secure, the internet is incredibly fast but incredibly insecure, https is absolutely useless when the government can hijack any connection they want. I personally want a happy middle-ground that isn't painfully slow.
Quote
if providing a platform for child porn is the purpose of NXT, I am out
Childporn was never my intention. I just want normal services like email and instant messaging without government spying.
i don't like it, not one bit. There are enough darknet services now. why try to reinvent the wheel?
We need to decentralize everything, includes website.
but we also need to protect us and keep one control democratically and if it's possible, one way for definitely remove one site.
+1
We need to figure this out.
I don't think anybody said, that the purpose of this was to promote child porn.
i don't like it, not one bit. There are enough darknet services now. why try to reinvent the wheel?
We need to decentralize everything, includes website.
but we also need to protect us and keep one control democratically and if it's possible, one way for definitely remove one site.
i don't like it, not one bit. There are enough darknet services now. why try to reinvent the wheel?
Decentralizing everything is kind of the idea behind Nxt.
So from a rational standpoint, Nxt would be only the next Internet, the next TCP IP. Making Nxt accountable for the content on chains would be dumb.
But from a marketing (or government) standpoint, this is a totally different story.
But from a marketing (or government) standpoint, this is a totally different story.
Edit: so, are there other answers to that question?
Well, there is a built in voting system, we could hold a public forum on the "morality" of a website and then vote accordingly on whether or not to allow it to continue operating in the network. We only need to satiate public interest to a certain extent, if ignorance is bliss, let's keep the public in a state of ananda 
. Just to be clear: I stated what I did because I am very, very practical and knów we will be in deed doo-doo when people misuse it.
If we know this, we can prepare for it, which is a practical solution to the problem before it arises.
Seems like Nxt is, lately, indeed slowly going down the drain.
Did anyone expect this? I truly thought it was going to take off in development 1-2 months ago.
No joined development, just some yaddayadda here and there, saddening.
Did anyone expect this? I truly thought it was going to take off in development 1-2 months ago.
No joined development, just some yaddayadda here and there, saddening.
I don't see this at all, but I recognise that you do.
We are still on schedule, but releases are a bit more spaced. We had a few weeks that saw continuous releases of stuff.
These stretches happen in any project.
Will everybody be able to build a parallel chain next to Nxt?
According to CIAM Open it will not be difficult.
[EDIT] So when it comes from him, no no probably not everybody
eightspaces, this feeling is cyclical, i felt the same way early december when nxt was essentially just vaporware.
yeah, that might be very well true
what's your main account?
Edit: so, are there other answers to that question?
Well, there is a built in voting system, we could hold a public forum on the "morality" of a website and then vote accordingly on whether or not to allow it to continue operating in the network. We only need to satiate public interest to a certain extent, if ignorance is bliss, let's keep the public in a state of ananda
. I will personally be focusing on a simple browser extension for chrome during the next two weeks, it will interface with the NXT client to decode base64 and then display the decoded string in the web browser.
eightspaces, this feeling is cyclical, i felt the same way early december when nxt was essentially just vaporware.
Will everybody be able to build a parallel chain next to Nxt?
Seems like Nxt is, lately, indeed slowly going down the drain.
Did anyone expect this? I truly thought it was going to take off in development 1-2 months ago.
No joined development, just some yaddayadda here and there, saddening.
Did anyone expect this? I truly thought it was going to take off in development 1-2 months ago.
No joined development, just some yaddayadda here and there, saddening.
I think if we integrate application level URI schemes (i.e. nxt://, as someone suggested earlier) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/aa767914(v=vs.85).aspx, with a distributed storage parallel block chain to host websites -- the value of nxt would go to 2 BN in about a week.
Simple answer, NO
if this is possible and nxt it does not the competence will do it
I highly doubt the competition would do this without building in some way of not being shot down by a smear campaign.
We may not like it, but "child porn" and "terrorism" are surefire ways of killing appeal immediately.
Doesn't have to be true, it just needs to be mentioned.
So instead of stuffing our heads in the sand, if we want to do this, you need a plan on how to answer those questions when they are asked.
"People are free to do as they like" is not the answer that will help.
Edit: so, are there other answers to that question?
ok, i agree
we must to look for solutions to this
We should definitely pay attention to the possible bad uses af this, and discuss it. Because it WILL be misused, and I wish I was smart enough to stop it. And to judge where to draw the line, if I could. That said, I don't think dark forces should stop this initiative.
Will a distributed storage parallel block chain make more terrorists?
You can mine them.
Allow me to introduce myself, I am an early investor in NXT, and have been floating around various community forums since november under different names. I know C++, Java, PHP, Javascript, Html, CSS, SQL, Python, and HDL (Hardware Description Language).
I haven't been around for the past two months because of health reasons, but now I want to contribute in any way I can.
I think if we integrate application level URI schemes (i.e. nxt://, as someone suggested earlier) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/aa767914(v=vs.85).aspx, with a distributed storage parallel block chain to host websites -- the value of nxt would go to 2 BN in about a week.
In fact a simple executable with root privileges could reprogram browsers without any user effort.
Thoughts? If enough people are interested I can fund this project out of my own pocket.
I haven't been around for the past two months because of health reasons, but now I want to contribute in any way I can.
I think if we integrate application level URI schemes (i.e. nxt://, as someone suggested earlier) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/aa767914(v=vs.85).aspx, with a distributed storage parallel block chain to host websites -- the value of nxt would go to 2 BN in about a week.
In fact a simple executable with root privileges could reprogram browsers without any user effort.
Thoughts? If enough people are interested I can fund this project out of my own pocket.
YES, very interested! Very very interested.
+1
Jump to: