Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 326. (Read 2761650 times)

ok, i agree
we must to look for solutions to this

I highly doubt the competition would do this without building in some way of not being shot down by a smear campaign.
We may not like it, but "child porn" and "terrorism" are surefire ways of killing appeal immediately.
Doesn't have to be true, it just needs to be mentioned.

So instead of stuffing our heads in the sand, if we want to do this, you need a plan on how to answer those questions when they are asked.

"People are free to do as they like" is not the answer that will help.

Edit: so, are there other answers to that question?

if this is possible and nxt it does not the competence will do it

I am in the process of testing pool servers for "the coin that shall not be named", so no guarantees about uptime or proper coin allocations until I am done.

A configurable list of servers will be the only servers the clients would be able to submit to.

The main server will then poll these servers and tally up the results, including identifying the naughty NXTaccts. When the cumulative earnings exceeds the threshold (now at 100) it will still automatically send them. This is for testnet so I can make sure the delivery mechanism is still working.

There is no realtime reporting via client anymore, but I am planning on having a webpage with the latest stats, so at some point the clients can parse that page. The issue is that each pool server gets submissions from a subset of all NXTaccts, which might or might not be changing IP addresses. So only the main server can tabulate the results and identify any double submissions and know the total contribution. I realized that instead of sending all this back to each pool server, I might as well keep it centralized for now as adding a return results phase just adds lots of network traffic but doesnt make things any less centralized. Since each block is independent from the other blocks as far as new submissions go, there is no reason why the "main server" cant be rotated, but that requires syncing account balances and blacklist info and for now I have other higher priority tasks, like creating queues for all paths within the multigateway and custom multisig accts for each deposit.

The same two level server topology will be used for other projects, so I want to make sure it is scalable and solid. Maybe I got a bit carried away, but I wrote dynamically resizing hashtables so that lookups for IP addresses and NXT accts are effectively constant time (I dont allow >80% full hashtables). I made it so that the hashtables can be used for any datastructure so I will port the asset code to use them. Linear searching is only viable for small datasets.

I also implemented protocol handler registration for the networking side. This allows variants (different ports) to each have their own set of funcids handled by separate functions. Each with adaptive sized input and output packets to eliminate excess network bandwidth. Kind of a pain to have to define a pair of structs for each variant.funcid, but at least now it is pretty extensible.

Not bad for a simple C programmer!

James

You can mine them.

Will a distributed storage parallel block chain make more terrorists?

Well, it would be "a" concern, it just wouldn't be mine. There are currently 25k+ terrorist cells operating on torbrowser, which gets 80% of its funding from the good old USA (Specifically the DoD).

That would be no concern to us. People are free to do what they like. If they break a law intentionally and get caught, they will perhaps pay the price by the laws that govern them. The intention is freedom and innovation.

Wesleyh

Is your Nxtwallet for windows still actual? I cannot run it. It starts, but cannot enter passphrasse, it waits for long time.

YES, very interested! Very very interested.

Nxt CPU - Cryptocurrency Processing Unit - in blue plastic.

Silver version is still waiting for you : http://107.170.117.237/index.php/topic,105.0.html

3D printed pendant:

Sent 10k

I've registered an account at http://nxtra.org/nxt-client/

please send some test NXT

the account id is 2361169608080828078

Thanks

Welcome, cool to hear your new ideas!

Ahahaha xD

+1 This needs to happen for better distribution, just a big fart we have to rid of, in a few weeks/months Nxt will be stronger and evenly devided. Critics no longer can use the argument about unfair distibution.

Fuck it, I'm Ebenezer Scrooge on Christmas Morning today!

 

damelon haha, I did not want any donations xD

I was just kidding 

I don't exactly know where my health is going at the moment, or my time. I'm committed to helping out and this is definitely in my best interest.

I could write the executable/protocol (protocol would be fairly simple, a entered URI would call NXT, NXT would interpret the URI and pull data from the blockchain and store it in a temporary file system, the browser would then read the filesystem and display the "index") for the URI scheme, but with the current way NXT is set up a string of data can't be stored if it is over 1kb. This creates many problems and will ultimately produce static websites that are about as slow as those on the TOR network.

To allow dynamic webpages on the NXT network onion routing needs to be implemented which I might be able to do, but it would take a month or two at least. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion_routing.

It could be totally independent and linked with the alias system at the same time. The alias system on the main blockchain could be used to point to a segment of data in a parallel blockchain.  

Thanks!
I'll contact them and see if I can help.

The browser extension route may be more kosher, and could be just as effective as an URI scheme. Instead of .onion (in context with https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tor/ohielanlcdleofjibfmjbbkaajdcpoil?hl=en as a proof of concept) the extension could be .nxt or something along those lines.