Did you invest money in infrastructure and other resources essential for the development of anoncoin project? If not then who the fuck are you to demand "ethical responsibility" from devs? Devs have no accountability towards you whatsoever, nor legal nor moral. Your speculating is your own responsibility.
That is one of the stupidest comments I have seen anywhere in a long time.
I'm still up while you're obviously massively down and that seems to be difference. I'm all for critical reviews but slander is just trolling for attention. Hence probably my last reply to someone so desperate for attention.
Actually I sold the anc that I could access easily a few weeks ago and bought cannabiscoin which has done okay. I still have a few hundred anc though and consider it salvageable.
Unlike you and fuckbuddy, whose only purpose seems to be to stroke people who you think might benefit you, I am actually trying to benefit the coin by giving sound advice.
Zerocoin will not work. Either by design or by accident it is fatally flawed. The only way it would work is to design something completely different and call it zerocoin.
If gnosis would have missed the deadline as he did and as a result of that the price would by some miracle go up i bet you some anc that none of the douchbags would be here trolling about "scammer devs".
I have criticized the obvious problems with anc for a long time. It is hairless dogs like you that let the rot in this coin fester until it gets to this point. You only want to defend the status quo. Nothing should be questioned, no matter how absurd it is, so long as you are supporting whatever is the authority. People like you are poisonous friends and certainly toxic to the coins you contaminate with your polluted loyalty.
What would it take for you to criticize the decisions anc devs have made?
Is there any possible mistake they might make that you would criticize?
Or do you think that so long as you are loyal like a poodle everything will work out?