OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 376.

EricCartman

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

EDIT: Found out I don't have enough system ram for that high of thread-concurrency. Lower thread-concurrency's work.

Card: GIGABYTE GV-R795WF3-3GD Radeon HD 7950
Drivers: 13.1
OS: Windows 7 64 bit

Config:

Code:

cgminer --scrypt -o http://notroll.in:3333 -u USER -p PASS --thread-concurrency 24000 -I 18 -g 1 -w 256

Code:

 cgminer version 2.11.4 - Started: [2013-04-09 21:47:55]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  U:0.0/m  WU:0.0/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 2  LW: 7  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to notroll.in diff 31 with stratum as user 
 Block: 3bf40f1985b2842a...  Diff:15.4M  Started: [21:49:12]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  29.0C 2273RPM | OFF   / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2013-04-09 21:47:50] Started cgminer 2.11.4
 [2013-04-09 21:47:53] Probing for an alive pool
 [2013-04-09 21:48:26] Error -5: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueu
eNDRangeKernel)
 [2013-04-09 21:48:26] GPU 0 failure, disabling!
 [2013-04-09 21:48:26] Thread 0 being disabled

Why?

Aztec

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Hi all

I've been trying to mine litecoins using cgminer. I managed to connect to my pool ok but after running it for about 5 minutes I had q=20 a=1

I only had 5 minutes but I don't think those results look good. If I was mining for Bitcoin I would have had a lot more shares accepted in 5 minutes mining

Is there something going wrong?

Thanks

EDIT
Here is the command line and output:

C:\Apps\mining\guiminer-scrypt_win32_binaries_v0.03\cgminer>cgminer.exe --scrypt
-u User.1 -p password -o stratum+tcp://stratum.give-me-ltc.com:3333 --gpu-platform
0 -d0 -w 256 -v 1 -I 18 -g 1 -l 1 -T --thread-concurrency 1600

[2013-04-09 19:59:52] Started cgminer 2.11.3
[2013-04-09 19:59:52] Probing for an alive pool
[2013-04-09 20:02:51] Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted

[2013-04-09 20:03:05] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

[2013-04-09 20:04:36] Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted

[2013-04-09 20:06:14] Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted

[2013-04-09 20:06:26] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

[2013-04-09 20:06:36] Accepted 8d8684d2 Diff 35/32 GPU 0
[2013-04-09 20:07:13] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

[2013-04-09 20:08:43] Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted

[2013-04-09 20:09:40] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

[2013-04-09 20:09:53] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

[2013-04-09 20:11:17] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

(1s):370.0K (avg):363.5Kh/s | Q:22 A:1 R:0 HW:0 E:5% U:0.1/m

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: pekv2 on April 09, 2013, 03:04:56 PM

Quote from: pekv2 on April 09, 2013, 01:30:52 PM

Quote from: kano on April 08, 2013, 06:47:09 PM

Not solving your problem, but telling you what to look at that it has already told you:

1) [2013-04-08 18:06:06] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1124.2)

2) [2013-04-08 18:06:06] Platform 1 devices: 2

Something wrong here?

Kano, I apologize, but I do not understand what you're saying or trying to have me understand here. Please explain.

Thanks.

Find out what version that number is - it may (or may not) be a problem.
As for Platform - when reading the README, search for the word "platform" (F3 or Ctrl-F or whatever the search key is)
You have an unusual setup - so you will need to read and understand more of the README ...

pekv2

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 502

Quote from: pekv2 on April 09, 2013, 01:30:52 PM

Quote from: kano on April 08, 2013, 06:47:09 PM

Not solving your problem, but telling you what to look at that it has already told you:

1) [2013-04-08 18:06:06] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1124.2)

2) [2013-04-08 18:06:06] Platform 1 devices: 2

Something wrong here?

Kano, I apologize, but I do not understand what you're saying or trying to have me understand here. Please explain.

Thanks.

pekv2

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 502

Quote from: kano on April 08, 2013, 06:47:09 PM

Not solving your problem, but telling you what to look at that it has already told you:

1) [2013-04-08 18:06:06] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1124.2)

2) [2013-04-08 18:06:06] Platform 1 devices: 2

Something wrong here?

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 12:42:47 PM

Yeah I read that and it has nothing to do with my error since I'm getting way to HIGH (read, not LOW) hashrates. I normally get 170Mh with -I 4 and when I tune things I get around 200Mh, but NOT 3000Mh.

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 10:12:15 AM

BTCGuild web interface reports ~50MH/s

Your hashrate is lower than it should be.

jeezy

legendary

Activity: 1237

Merit: 1010

Quote from: crazyates on April 09, 2013, 12:20:55 PM

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 11:09:51 AM

Quote from: crazyates on April 09, 2013, 11:06:47 AM

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 10:12:15 AM

Small bug here? When I set -I 20 this happens: (with 1x HD 5770)

That's not a bug. That's just being stupid. Switch to -I 7.

Care to explain?

Taken right from the FAQ in the very first post of this thread:

Quote

Q: I'm getting much lower hashrates than I should be for my GPU?
A: Look at your driver/SDK combination and disable power saving options for
your GPU. Specifically look to disable ULPS. Make sure not to set intensity
above 11 for BTC mining.

Yeah I read that and it has nothing to do with my error since I'm getting way to HIGH (read, not LOW) hashrates. I normally get 170Mh with -I 4 and when I tune things I get around 200Mh, but NOT 3000Mh.

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 11:09:51 AM

Quote from: crazyates on April 09, 2013, 11:06:47 AM

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 10:12:15 AM

Small bug here? When I set -I 20 this happens: (with 1x HD 5770)

That's not a bug. That's just being stupid. Switch to -I 7.

Care to explain?

Taken right from the FAQ in the very first post of this thread:

Quote

Q: I'm getting much lower hashrates than I should be for my GPU?
A: Look at your driver/SDK combination and disable power saving options for
your GPU. Specifically look to disable ULPS. Make sure not to set intensity
above 11 for BTC mining.

regular

sr. member

Activity: 297

Merit: 250

I'm on windows 8 with the latest cgminer. I find that I have to reset cgminer atleast 1-2 times a day because it hangs on my 7970 running only at 1000/1000.

The last message is usually "Pool 0 stratum share submission failure" but it fails to connect to my alternate pools. My windows 7 rig with 4 GPUs never has this issue and has been going for weeks on end. Is there any incompatibility with windows 8? I have made sure that all firewalls on my computer have full permission for cgminer as well.

jeezy

legendary

Activity: 1237

Merit: 1010

Quote from: crazyates on April 09, 2013, 11:06:47 AM

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 10:12:15 AM

Small bug here? When I set -I 20 this happens: (with 1x HD 5770)

That's not a bug. That's just being stupid. Switch to -I 7.

Care to explain?

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jeezy on April 09, 2013, 10:12:15 AM

Small bug here? When I set -I 20 this happens: (with 1x HD 5770)

That's not a bug. That's just being stupid. Switch to -I 7.

jeezy

legendary

Activity: 1237

Merit: 1010

Small bug here? When I set -I 20 this happens: (with 1x HD 5770)

BTCGuild web interface reports ~50MH/s

Code:

 cgminer version 2.11.4 - Started: [2013-04-09 17:10:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):2.829M (avg):2.843Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  U:0.0/m  WU:0.0/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 1  LW: 20  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to eu-stratum.btcguild.com diff 1 with stratum as user xxx
 Block: 0090bdbd26df22b1...  Diff:7.67M  Started: [17:10:22]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  54.0C  42%    | 2.846M/2.934Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2013-04-09 17:10:20] Started cgminer 2.11.4
 [2013-04-09 17:10:21] Probing for an alive pool

BitMinerN8

hero member

Activity: 626

Merit: 500

Mining since May 2011.

Quote from: FreedomCoin on April 09, 2013, 10:07:14 AM

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on April 09, 2013, 10:04:36 AM

Quote from: FreedomCoin on April 09, 2013, 09:29:35 AM

am i suppose to run the cgminer.c in terminal? when i mark it as executable i get a bunch of errors in terminal.

How did you compile it?

I do not believe i did compile it.. just extracted the tar ball and tried to run it... i do not understand CURL and what it has to do with CGMINER.

Am i missing something?

How far did you get in the README?

FreedomCoin

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 507

Freedom to choose

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on April 09, 2013, 10:04:36 AM

Quote from: FreedomCoin on April 09, 2013, 09:29:35 AM

am i suppose to run the cgminer.c in terminal? when i mark it as executable i get a bunch of errors in terminal.

How did you compile it?

I do not believe i did compile it.. just extracted the tar ball and tried to run it... i do not understand CURL and what it has to do with CGMINER.

Am i missing something?

BitMinerN8

hero member

Activity: 626

Merit: 500

Mining since May 2011.

Quote from: FreedomCoin on April 09, 2013, 09:29:35 AM

am i suppose to run the cgminer.c in terminal? when i mark it as executable i get a bunch of errors in terminal.

How did you compile it?

FreedomCoin

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 507

Freedom to choose

am i suppose to run the cgminer.c in terminal? when i mark it as executable i get a bunch of errors in terminal.

mech

member

Activity: 115

Merit: 10

I can not understand one thing. Why use the settings:

7970 on the same system give 700 kH and the other 500 kH!

Prietom frequency does not affect performance.

Code:

cgminer -o stratum+tcp://ltcmine.ru:3333 -O xxx:xxx --scrypt --worksize 256 --shaders 2048 --vectors 1 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --intensity 13 --auto-gpu 2>logfile.txt

What's wrong?

nathanrees19

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: lenny_ on April 08, 2013, 10:42:23 PM

cgminer supports Cairnsmore1 HashVoodoo dynamic frequency changing?

No, if you want good FPGA support you need ---Miner.

Translation: your fork is optimised for outdated technology. Nice one.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: kano on April 08, 2013, 11:49:14 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: lenny_ on April 08, 2013, 10:42:23 PM

cgminer supports Cairnsmore1 HashVoodoo dynamic frequency changing?

No, if you want good FPGA support you need BFGMiner.

Good - as in - delay the BFL release by almost a week.
Good - as in - brick Avalon ASICs
Good - as in - his new "Luke-Jr is God" thread shows a REALLY large number of commits to attempt and fail to get Avalon working on his BrickMiner

Sounds good to me Cheesy

Meanwhile - checkout cgminer - support for Avalon (working fine but not in release yet) completed by the originator of more code in cgminer than anyone else - ckolivas

Though there is one thing good about the BrickMiner - all the code he copies from cgminer every release ... just a pity what he does with it ... ... ... the youtube video is gross, don't watch it Tongue

But no, we rarely copy any of the abortion he creates, back

We know to avoid his ineptitude.

You wish, liar.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: lenny_ on April 08, 2013, 10:42:23 PM

cgminer supports Cairnsmore1 HashVoodoo dynamic frequency changing?

No, if you want good FPGA support you need BFGMiner.

Good - as in - delay the BFL release by almost a week.
Good - as in - brick Avalon ASICs
Good - as in - his new "Luke-Jr is God" thread shows a REALLY large number of commits to attempt and fail to get Avalon working on his BrickMiner

Sounds good to me Cheesy

Meanwhile - checkout cgminer - support for Avalon (working fine but not in release yet) completed by the originator of more code in cgminer than anyone else - ckolivas

Though there is one thing good about the BrickMiner - all the code he copies from cgminer every release ... just a pity what he does with it ... ... ... the youtube video is gross, don't watch it Tongue

But no, we rarely copy any of the abortion he creates, back

We know to avoid his ineptitude.

Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 376. (Read 5806057 times)