...Alas this statement is completely false and thus shows that indeed these miners have not been tested to be able to find blocks...
KDB upgrade will be today for the rest of the solo code.
...
...
Also, this is a support thread. If you have an issue post in the other thread.
-Dave
You posted here so I'll reply here.
1) KDB is the database system I wrote that manages the pool, it doesn't generate work for miners, so changes to KDB don't require block level testing. The solo changes did not require any ckpool changes, though I did remove a few lines of code that sent, no longer necessary data, to KDB.
Though I do still do block level tests on KDB sometimes anyway.
KDB also submits blocks as a failsafe, because it is an exact bitwise block test, whereas ckpool's block submit code is based on an inaccurate floating point block test.
I also do standard low level block submission tests to both ckpool and kdb all the time.
2) Yes I do the necessary full block level testing each time I make changes to ckpool and bitcoin that could affect the code dealing with blocks.
3) These jokers here 'supposedly' have written a new miner ... and have stated that they have never done the necessary testing that it can find blocks - I wonder what excuse they'll give when they add solo mining direct to the local bitcoind to their code?
... see the post by someone else above, about slush, that you clearly have conveniently forgotten all about, or were you not around back then?
Or are you just chiming in to post false information for some other reason?