[OFFICIAL POLL] QRK LOGO COMPETITION - page 28.

Promethium

full member

Activity: 222

Merit: 100

Quote from: Boxxl on February 01, 2014, 05:17:40 PM

Thanks man

I spend a lot of time on my design

Quote from: KJO on February 01, 2014, 05:14:23 PM

Quote from: Boxxl on February 01, 2014, 04:08:13 PM

I'm in the top 4 Grin

You are the future winner.

You do more with a simplistic schematic than smaragda does with a billion lines.

Your design is simple, elegant, immediately recognizable, aesthetically pleasing, and utilizes color in a subtle and stunning fashion.

Your "less is more" approach is highly successful because you see fit to serve the spirit of quark unlike smaragda who tries to overpower the logo with scale and an overabundance of geometrics to compensate for a lack of cohesion.

Boxxl

I Like it!

quarkfx

sr. member

Activity: 396

Merit: 250

Btw. has the voting between the entrants finished already? Otherwise the result of this poll could cause strategic voting.

martijnp

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: quarkfx on February 01, 2014, 06:38:48 PM

I just registered coming from forum.qrk.cc and I voted for martijnps design. There are other good ones in the ring...boxxl made a good one as well imho. But while these are professional design from what you can see in the result and in the idea behind, the result of smaragda is a laugh. I mean, its cool that he_she provided a design but it lacks of all that a logo needs. Its not scalable, not suitable for masses and lacks a unique look. The fact that it takes the lead way ahead can only be explained by peer-mobilization or fakeaccounts. Both would be a problem for the contest.

Thanks a lot quarkfx! Wink

quarkfx

sr. member

Activity: 396

Merit: 250

I just registered coming from forum.qrk.cc and I voted for martijnps design. There are other good ones in the ring...boxxl made a good one as well imho. But while these are professional design from what you can see in the result and in the idea behind, the result of smaragda is a laugh. I mean, its cool that he_she provided a design but it lacks of all that a logo needs. Its not scalable, not suitable for masses and lacks a unique look. The fact that it takes the lead way ahead can only be explained by peer-mobilization or fakeaccounts. Both would be a problem for the contest.

martijnp

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: Prabhjot Lalli on February 01, 2014, 06:33:11 PM

I personally voted for mjbmonetarymetals. But I'm loving martijnp design also. Hard decision. But I'm fine as long as smaragda won't win.

Thanks!

Prabhjot Lalli

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

I personally voted for mjbmonetarymetals. But I'm loving martijnp design also. Hard decision. But I'm fine as long as smaragda won't win.

Zzzack

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I think leigrecc should win. his has always been my favorite

And whats smargdda's design? Is it bad and is he trying to rig?

cryptasm

legendary

Activity: 997

Merit: 1002

Gamdom.com

Quote from: FlipPro on February 01, 2014, 06:17:36 PM

MY VOTE IS FOR:
mjbmonetarymetals

+1 dudes put a lot of work in and I like his upgrade of the original logo.

FlipPro

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1015

MY VOTE IS FOR:

mjbmonetarymetals

Zzzack

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Post your designs in this thread then we'll vote

barrysoetoro

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

VOTE BARRY!! VOTE BARRY!!!

Kiss

http://i.imgur.com/hCHuNSC.jpg

Full image:
http://i.imgur.com/78o0gxn.jpg

Boxxl

hero member

Activity: 800

Merit: 502

The current logo of Quark is good. But a good design can have a huge different.
We shall see this year... the marketcap of Quark

duuuuude

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 500

here is mine please vote for duuuuude

j

DeluxBoy

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Good luck to all - and vote for me: AnnonQ Grin

http://imgur.com/Ub1kMkn

reRaise

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

The current Quark logo will stay, even after the voting has been finished.

KJO

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: KJO on February 01, 2014, 05:00:49 PM

...with a logo design that fails its very purpose...

Go tell that to those that have participated in a logo CHANGE contest and have come up with the EXISTING logo as their submission!?!?! Huh

ROFLMAO! Grin

Don't worry... I will eventually have to leave my workstation and/or go to sleep... so you won't have to deal with my responses!!! Wink

Edit: ...you will just have to read my responses all together later!

There is nothing wrong with the orig logo my friend. It is the textural and color treatment of the orig logo that needs refinement.

You are trying to reinvent the wheel but have blown the tires out in the process.

I have no horses in this game. I am looking for the most marketable logo for quark and yours is not it.

You continued acquiescence to our concerns shows me enough to know you couldnt care less about quark.

Boxxl

hero member

Activity: 800

Merit: 502

Thanks man

I spend a lot of time on my design

Quote from: KJO on February 01, 2014, 05:14:23 PM

Quote from: Boxxl on February 01, 2014, 04:08:13 PM

I'm in the top 4 Grin

You are the future winner.

You do more with a simplistic schematic than smaragda does with a billion lines.

Your design is simple, elegant, immediately recognizable, aesthetically pleasing, and utilizes color in a subtle and stunning fashion.

Your "less is more" approach is highly successful because you see fit to serve the spirit of quark unlike smaragda who tries to overpower the logo with scale and an overabundance of geometrics to compensate for a lack of cohesion.

Boxxl

KJO

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 100

Quote from: Boxxl on February 01, 2014, 04:08:13 PM

I'm in the top 4 Grin

You are the future winner.

You do more with a simplistic schematic than smaragda does with a billion lines.

Your design is simple, elegant, immediately recognizable, aesthetically pleasing, and utilizes color in a subtle and stunning fashion.

Your "less is more" approach is highly successful because you see fit to serve the spirit of quark unlike smaragda who tries to overpower the logo with scale and an overabundance of geometrics to compensate for a lack of cohesion.

mymenace

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1061

Smile

Quote from: KJO on February 01, 2014, 05:00:49 PM

Quote from: mymenace on February 01, 2014, 04:43:23 PM

What is unprofessional is to call other people names or attack their work

Please be respectful of other peoples work

I as a customer would be very hesitant of approaching a designer who behaved in the above ways

constructive criticism is professional behaviour

such as

i do not like that design

I prefer this persons design

Here are some helpful tips (work is too busy looking)

Wrong. Those are not professional critiques. A professional designer responds to the artist's program. I see you have never been in a design jury. Well let me educate you then.

A valid critique is "this logo fails to adhere to the program" or "the designer seems more interested in superfluous geometrics than the motif".

Constructive criticism can only take place when the designer accepts said constructive criticism.

What we have now is an amateur who draws nice pictures and has rigged the voting to claim a substantial prize with a logo design that fails its very purpose while calling very concerned quarkers "trolls".

Allow is 100% correct.

agree with your professional critiques

but am I not correct when i say it is unprofessional to call other people names or attack their work

KJO

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 100

Quote from: mymenace on February 01, 2014, 04:43:23 PM

What is unprofessional is to call other people names or attack their work

Please be respectful of other peoples work

I as a customer would be very hesitant of approaching a designer who behaved in the above ways

constructive criticism is professional behaviour

such as

i do not like that design

I prefer this persons design

Here are some helpful tips (work is too busy looking)

Wrong. Those are not professional critiques. A professional designer responds to the artist's program. I see you have never been in a design jury. Well let me educate you then.

A valid critique is "this logo fails to adhere to the program" or "the designer seems more interested in superfluous geometrics than the motif".

Constructive criticism can only take place when the designer accepts said constructive criticism.

What we have now is an amateur who draws nice pictures and has rigged the voting to claim a substantial prize with a logo design that fails its very purpose while calling very concerned quarkers "trolls".

Allow is 100% correct.

Topic: [OFFICIAL POLL] QRK LOGO COMPETITION - page 28. (Read 34187 times)