A true maker/taker model (I think, and I'm no expert) should look like this:
Market makers receive 1/2 the fee paid by maker takers.
Market takers pay .3% fee (so Bitfinex receives .15%, and the market maker receives .15%).
This is how you "incentivize" being a market maker.
this!
Thought about something similar but your idea seems to be an even better approach.
That fee structure would be a really incentive for being a market maker.
What´s your opinion Rapha/Giancarlo ?
I'm not a trader, so i might be wrong, but doesn't the new fee structure already incentivize being a market maker? A market maker only pays half the fee (or less, if you trade a lot) compared to a market taker, that looks like a big incentive to me.
mediocre incentive -> pay less fees then a market taker
but now think about the situation where some part of the fees taken from the market takers doesn´t disappear in bitfinex pockets but instead are distributed among the market makers.
= very huge incentive
which would result in:
-bigger orderbook
-more trading volume
...
And in the long run even Bitfinex would earn more by this, because more depth in the orderbook minimizes certain risks and increases the trading volume, which increases
the total fees.
A market maker incentive model where they earn (instead of just paying less) therefore would be a more sustainable approach