Topic: ~OgNasty's self scratching - page 3. (Read 2881 times)

I don't believe I've ever lied or left trust that is in any way dishonest.  I've never left you red trust and you are all bad opinions so all evidence points to you being full of it.  I also don't care about my trust score or I wouldn't be so independent in giving you the finger when you try and tell me who I can and cannot add to my network, so you're projecting your own use of the system on my honest inclusion of honest members I wish to include in my network.  I'm not even in DT anymore so the entire self scratching argument doesn't even make sense.  

You're a crazed emotional woman trying to enact some form of revenge because I excluded you from my network long ago for having horrible judgement.  What you don't realize is that everything you've done towards me since I made that decision has only enforced that I made the right decision in excluding you and you can pull the wool over everyone else's eyes, but I see you for what you are.  Not that it makes a difference to me, as I wouldn't give 2 shits about you if you would stop attacking me with this sort of nonsense constantly.  It's sad how much time and effort you spend vying for my attention when I am staying active in my Bitcoin projects and continuing to offer trustworthy services.  I'm a great addition to this forum whether you like it or not, and you should appreciate what I do here instead of constantly trying to be a gnat buzzing around my head.

Edit: 2 of the members you listed below as me giving bad feedback to have threatened to kill me. The other was involved in the well documented extortion and harassment of a user here. Such a fail that you use those as your evidence of bad feedback. They very much deserve those negatives and the fact you side with people like that says everything about you.

I have a problem with your lying and trust abuse. That's a reasonable problem to have but you or anyone else is welcome to exclude me if they don't think so. Likewise they should exclude you if they don't think that sending red trust for opinions or including people to boost your own score is acceptable use of the trust system.

My signature has pages of your definition of trustworthy. 

You're right.  I shouldn't troll you.  We should get back to the fact that none of the accounts I added had any controversial trust ratings but you have a problem with them because they trust someone who has been proven to be trustworthy but you don't like because you are guided by your emotions and not logic or the best interests of the trust network. 

I hope I can speak for everyone when I say that we are very excited to see you make some money in a signature campaign. But you're still the same slimy conniving liar as ever and your signature doesn't have anything to do with your self-serving trust list.


Nor does this. Let's stick to the topic.

Agreed.  Og is quick to bring up how Theymos continues to trust him and distrust me, despite Og's admitted ponzi, and Theymos been paying him the entire time he's been scamming and telling people I was a pedophile.    

Who wouldn't be happy if they had stolen enough to be set for life?  (Og's words)

($250 million in stolen FIAT and he is not sad.   At least he knows society expects his immoral actions need to be punished)

LOL... Sure, like anybody gives 2 fucks... I find it hilarious that you think you are so "relevant" here, just because you  are a long-term ponzi scammer who knows how to manipulate words and threads to your own choosing.

You still did the shit you did, it doesn't change anything, sorry dude...

And yet I've never been happier. 

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no?  All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign.  That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here. 

Look at this data that is being indexed by search engines right now.  stake.com is sponsoring his continued attacks. :/  
In my defense, I am starting to trade more and publically/officially trust a lot more as well.



The entire reply is self centered bullshit, but his last line is the one I'd like to quote:
"Learn your bitcointalk history."

Everyone should learn how OgNasty lost thousands of coins that were returned to him, from the words of OgNasty himself.

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:


(image created via loyce.club)

As opposed to the usual +87 (BTW the image in the OP updated as well so now it makes no sense... I should have made a copy of the image).

because u must begin by yourself
you are talking about lofty matters, start with yourself

most of this 135 users scammers and idiots, your mind like of them

Why are you specifically mentioning me in this context so many times? There are 135 users who included Vod on their Trust list.

Theymos doesn't seem like the guy who wants to rule by himself. It's up to the community, and the community gave Vod DT2 Strength (16).

Did I fall for it again by quoting an off-topic post?

I am Vod.  You are OGNasty.

Did you lose your funds like everyone else, or have you never lost any funds?

You contradict yourself.  

Deflection is all you got. I don't give a toss about "control" or whatever it is you're fantasizing about. I have always encouraged other users to exclude me if they don't trust my judgement, don't like my opinion... fuck, even if they just don't like me saying "fuck" too often they should go ahead and exclude me. And unlike you I don't retaliate, neither for trust exclusions nor red trust ratings.

You on the other hand - clinging to the imaginary "most trusted" title with all that you got, trust system integrity be damned - pathetic.

Also before you accuse others of lying you should make sure your own statements are truthful but that's probably too much to ask of you... never much of a facts person, are you.

Imagine standing behind Vod's ridiculous lies like LoyceV and suchmoon do while including him into their trust networks, and then trying to call out others for adding honest members with legitimate feedback to the trust network.  Is it clear yet that the goal for these users isn't an honest trust system tied to real life happenings, but to have control over who can or can't be in the trust network based on their own emotions?  Imagine wanting to exclude one of longest the most active trading histories on the forum because of honest positive feedback, while simultaneously including a user like Vod with now a very long verifiable record of lying (see recent example above) based on nothing but his own delusions while drunk.  It should be clear from this debacle that the trust network is not functioning as intended and needs some intervention from theymos.

Isn't that editing what is displayed, and not the data itself?

When you purchase twenty small items and they are grouped together on your bill as "sundries", do you think the seller is scamming you, or just presenting the data in a different way?

This is due to a issue in my original code -no conspiracy theories here.   I compared the previous list to the new one blindly, which in the case of DT removal, made a lot of entries change.  Fixing that issue will involve non-trivial coding- they will need to remove the entries that were not explicitly done by the user.  In the meantime, if they delete erroneous entries that do not affect anything, it saves time, makes the report clearer, and doesn't suggest one person removed another when they did not.

(This is an off topic reply - I will not respond to replies)

Back on topic:  OG lied about not losing 6,500 btc.   Is he being as honest about his DT inclusions?

I'd say it's inevitable. It comes with root access to a server. Just like theymos can edit any post I make here and do anything he wants to my account. He can even make it look like I edited it myself.
I trust him not to do it though, and that's enough for me.

I thought of that, that's why the new version had a later time stamp. Just in case anyone links to the old version: it's completely gone instead of changing it.

I don't think fixing technical glitches is a problem for trusting the creator of the tool. It's actually a good thing.

Technically both LoyceV and ( @suchmoon and/or @ibminer ) have altered the entries on their reciprocal sites - with good intentions I'm sure.

In LoyceV's case just recently there was the weekly trust list which was a duplicate of the previous week owing to the weekly run being done *before* theymos had run the list.  LoyceV then deleted the entire week's results and re-ran the sweep hours later (thus giving different results)

In the case of BPIP I'm not sure if it was suchmoon or ibminer on the edit button, but entries have occurred then been removed such as has occurred over the last (about two months) in the Trust Log page whenever a user removes their DT trust list - it is shown (I might be paraphrasing here) "the user has lost the ability to vote for DT2..." and then a long list of "X" no longer trusts/distrust this/that user" (again, another paraphrase)...  Those entries are then removed manually, or at least they were done manually at one point...

no it is not the list can be played with , Loyce even admitted to that in this thread.

Like I said this goes in circles.

and

my trust list does have

theymos
suchmoon
OgNasty
LoyceV

vod was left out for his dox of Og while Og was holding more the 1 million usd worth  of the forum's coins.

do I think Og added the names yes I do do I think it has much meaning no I don't.

so whats fucking you and your fucking friends  bastards discuss Og trust list ?
this is his trust list and it's none of your business you idiot

fuck off your self


you are not commynity, you are scammer )
just one of a thousand scammers and shut op your smelly ass