~OgNasty's self scratching - page 4.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: OgNasty on January 17, 2021, 11:44:13 AM

You're right. I shouldn't troll you. We should get back to the fact that none of the accounts I added had any controversial trust ratings but you have a problem with them because they trust someone who has been proven to be trustworthy but you don't like because you are guided by your emotions and not logic or the best interests of the trust network. Wink

I have a problem with your lying and trust abuse. That's a reasonable problem to have but you or anyone else is welcome to exclude me if they don't think so. Likewise they should exclude you if they don't think that sending red trust for opinions or including people to boost your own score is acceptable use of the trust system.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: OgNasty on January 17, 2021, 11:44:13 AM

who has been proven to be trustworthy

My signature has pages of your definition of trustworthy.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: suchmoon on January 17, 2021, 11:38:31 AM

Nor does this. Let's stick to the topic.

You're right. I shouldn't troll you. We should get back to the fact that none of the accounts I added had any controversial trust ratings but you have a problem with them because they trust someone who has been proven to be trustworthy but you don't like because you are guided by your emotions and not logic or the best interests of the trust network. Wink

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: OgNasty on January 17, 2021, 09:39:54 AM

And yet I've never been happier. Grin

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no? All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign. That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here. Cheesy

I hope I can speak for everyone when I say that we are very excited to see you make some money in a signature campaign. But you're still the same slimy conniving liar as ever and your signature doesn't have anything to do with your self-serving trust list.

Quote from: Vod on January 17, 2021, 11:05:48 AM

~

Nor does this. Let's stick to the topic.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: owlcatz on January 17, 2021, 10:56:16 AM

Quote from: OgNasty on January 17, 2021, 09:39:54 AM

And yet I've never been happier.

You still did the shit you did, it doesn't change anything, sorry dude... Cheesy

Agreed. Og is quick to bring up how Theymos continues to trust him and distrust me, despite Og's admitted ponzi, and Theymos been paying him the entire time he's been scamming and telling people I was a pedophile.

Who wouldn't be happy if they had stolen enough to be set for life? (Og's words)

($250 million in stolen FIAT and he is not sad. At least he knows society expects his immoral actions need to be punished)

owlcatz

legendary

Activity: 3570

Merit: 1959

Quote from: OgNasty on January 17, 2021, 09:39:54 AM

And yet I've never been happier. Grin

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no? All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign. That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here. Cheesy

LOL... Sure, like anybody gives 2 fucks... I find it hilarious that you think you are so "relevant" here, just because you are a long-term ponzi scammer who knows how to manipulate words and threads to your own choosing.

You still did the shit you did, it doesn't change anything, sorry dude... Cheesy

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: suchmoon on January 16, 2021, 10:07:38 AM

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:

Loading...

(image created via loyce.club)

As opposed to the usual +87 (BTW the image in the OP updated as well so now it makes no sense... I should have made a copy of the image).

And yet I've never been happier. Grin

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no? All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign. That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here. Cheesy

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: suchmoon on January 16, 2021, 10:07:38 AM

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:

Loading...

(image created via loyce.club)

Look at this data that is being indexed by search engines right now. stake.com is sponsoring his continued attacks. :/
In my defense, I am starting to trade more and publically/officially trust a lot more as well.

The entire reply is self centered bullshit, but his last line is the one I'd like to quote:
"Learn your bitcointalk history."

Everyone should learn how OgNasty lost thousands of coins that were returned to him, from the words of OgNasty himself.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:

Loading...

(image created via loyce.club)

As opposed to the usual +87 (BTW the image in the OP updated as well so now it makes no sense... I should have made a copy of the image).

peloso

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1187

Quote from: LoyceV on December 11, 2020, 03:53:45 AM

Why are you specifically mentioning me in this context so many times? There are 135 users who included Vod on their Trust list.

because u must begin by yourself
you are talking about lofty matters, start with yourself

most of this 135 users scammers and idiots, your mind like of them

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: OgNasty on December 10, 2020, 05:35:10 PM

like LoyceV and suchmoon do while including him into their trust networks

Why are you specifically mentioning me in this context so many times? There are 135 users who included Vod on their Trust list.

Quote

It should be clear from this debacle that the trust network is not functioning as intended and needs some intervention from theymos.

Theymos doesn't seem like the guy who wants to rule by himself. It's up to the community, and the community gave Vod DT2 Strength (16).

Did I fall for it again by quoting an off-topic post?

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: OgNasty on December 10, 2020, 05:35:10 PM

Quote from: Vod on December 10, 2020, 03:33:45 PM

Back on topic: OG lied about not losing 6,500 btc. Is he being as honest about his DT inclusions?

Imagine standing behind Vod's ridiculous lies

I am Vod. You are OGNasty.

Did you lose your funds like everyone else, or have you never lost any funds?

You contradict yourself.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: OgNasty on December 10, 2020, 05:35:10 PM

~OgNasty

Deflection is all you got. I don't give a toss about "control" or whatever it is you're fantasizing about. I have always encouraged other users to exclude me if they don't trust my judgement, don't like my opinion... fuck, even if they just don't like me saying "fuck" too often they should go ahead and exclude me. And unlike you I don't retaliate, neither for trust exclusions nor red trust ratings.

You on the other hand - clinging to the imaginary "most trusted" title with all that you got, trust system integrity be damned - pathetic.

Also before you accuse others of lying you should make sure your own statements are truthful but that's probably too much to ask of you... never much of a facts person, are you.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Vod on December 10, 2020, 03:33:45 PM

Back on topic: OG lied about not losing 6,500 btc. Is he being as honest about his DT inclusions?

Imagine standing behind Vod's ridiculous lies like LoyceV and suchmoon do while including him into their trust networks, and then trying to call out others for adding honest members with legitimate feedback to the trust network. Is it clear yet that the goal for these users isn't an honest trust system tied to real life happenings, but to have control over who can or can't be in the trust network based on their own emotions? Imagine wanting to exclude one of longest the most active trading histories on the forum because of honest positive feedback, while simultaneously including a user like Vod with now a very long verifiable record of lying (see recent example above) based on nothing but his own delusions while drunk. It should be clear from this debacle that the trust network is not functioning as intended and needs some intervention from theymos.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 10, 2020, 10:48:41 AM

In the case of BPIP I'm not sure if it was suchmoon or ibminer on the edit button, but entries have occurred then been removed such as has occurred over the last (about two months) in the Trust Log page whenever a user removes their DT trust list - it is shown (I might be paraphrasing here) "the user has lost the ability to vote for DT2..." and then a long list of "X" no longer trusts/distrust this/that user" (again, another paraphrase)... Those entries are then removed manually, or at least they were done manually at one point...

Isn't that editing what is displayed, and not the data itself?

When you purchase twenty small items and they are grouped together on your bill as "sundries", do you think the seller is scamming you, or just presenting the data in a different way?

This is due to a issue in my original code -no conspiracy theories here. I compared the previous list to the new one blindly, which in the case of DT removal, made a lot of entries change. Fixing that issue will involve non-trivial coding- they will need to remove the entries that were not explicitly done by the user. In the meantime, if they delete erroneous entries that do not affect anything, it saves time, makes the report clearer, and doesn't suggest one person removed another when they did not.

(This is an off topic reply - I will not respond to replies)

Back on topic: OG lied about not losing 6,500 btc. Is he being as honest about his DT inclusions?

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 10, 2020, 09:44:14 AM

no it is not the list can be played with , Loyce even admitted to that in this thread.

I'd say it's inevitable. It comes with root access to a server. Just like theymos can edit any post I make here and do anything he wants to my account. He can even make it look like I edited it myself.
I trust him not to do it though, and that's enough for me.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 10, 2020, 10:48:41 AM

In LoyceV's case just recently there was the weekly trust list which was a duplicate of the previous week owing to the weekly run being done *before* theymos had run the list. LoyceV then deleted the entire week's results and re-ran the sweep hours later (thus giving different results)

I thought of that, that's why the new version had a later time stamp. Just in case anyone links to the old version: it's completely gone instead of changing it.

Quote

Those entries are then removed manually, or at least they were done manually at one point...

I don't think fixing technical glitches is a problem for trusting the creator of the tool. It's actually a good thing.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: LoyceV on December 09, 2020, 03:33:46 PM

You're actually the first to mention this. You're right, theoretically I could edit my Trust list viewer.

Technically both LoyceV and ( @suchmoon and/or @ibminer ) have altered the entries on their reciprocal sites - with good intentions I'm sure.

In LoyceV's case just recently there was the weekly trust list which was a duplicate of the previous week owing to the weekly run being done *before* theymos had run the list. LoyceV then deleted the entire week's results and re-ran the sweep hours later (thus giving different results)

In the case of BPIP I'm not sure if it was suchmoon or ibminer on the edit button, but entries have occurred then been removed such as has occurred over the last (about two months) in the Trust Log page whenever a user removes their DT trust list - it is shown (I might be paraphrasing here) "the user has lost the ability to vote for DT2..." and then a long list of "X" no longer trusts/distrust this/that user" (again, another paraphrase)... Those entries are then removed manually, or at least they were done manually at one point...

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4382

Merit: 9330

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: suchmoon on December 09, 2020, 08:41:52 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 09, 2020, 08:21:19 PM

btw the only person that verifies loyce list is theymos.

I'm really puzzled why you keep saying that. All data that LoyceV uses is public. The above is simply not true. Anyone can verify it. I don't think theymos verifies anything that LoyceV does, he just dumps the data weekly for anyone to use.

Let's stop with the unrelated stuff. Probably partly my fault for debating various tangents. Vod, you have multiple other threads for your dispute with Og. This is about OgNasty's trust list self-scratching.

no it is not the list can be played with , Loyce even admitted to that in this thread.

Like I said this goes in circles.

and

my trust list does have

theymos
suchmoon
OgNasty
LoyceV

vod was left out for his dox of Og while Og was holding more the 1 million usd worth of the forum's coins.

do I think Og added the names yes I do do I think it has much meaning no I don't.

peloso

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1187

Quote from: owlcatz on December 09, 2020, 08:51:13 AM

Quote from: peloso on December 09, 2020, 07:18:30 AM

WHY TMAN IS STILL IN YOUR TRUS LIST?

hey fucking owlcats ! Lauda terminated and she in your fucking trust list WHY?

Because I value their feedback. Also, it's my trust list. So fuck off, Retardo. Roll Eyes

so whats fucking you and ~~your fucking friends~~ bastards discuss Og trust list ?
this is his trust list and it's none of your business you idiot

fuck off your self

Quote from: Vod on December 09, 2020, 12:50:59 PM

Community disagrees with you. You trust people when you had nothing to risk, simply so they trust you back. My trust is earned.

you are not commynity, you are scammer )
just one of a thousand scammers and shut op your smelly ass

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 09, 2020, 06:09:48 PM

and you have admitted to my only problem with the attack on og you can doctor the evidence.

This thread isn't even based on my data:

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on December 05, 2020, 12:25:10 PM

It's based on BPIP, which (I think) is currently owned by suchmoon and ibminer.

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 09, 2020, 06:09:48 PM

edit: to be clear this attack on this thread done against Og is done with evidence that may or may not have been doctored.

If that would be the case, don't you think OgNasty would have pointed it out already?

Quote from: LoyceV on December 09, 2020, 03:33:46 PM

btw the only person that verifies loyce list is theymos.

I'd be honored if theymos takes the time to verify my Trust list viewer, but I don't think he does.

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 09, 2020, 08:21:19 PM

it does appear he did take some forked coins.

OgNasty never took Forkcoins without theymos' permission:

Quote from: theymos on December 02, 2019, 05:01:06 PM

In the case of the treasury agreement: all forkcoins were always forum property from the beginning. I voluntarily gifted OgNasty the non-major forkcoins, since dealing with them would be more trouble than they're worth. The three forkcoins transferred to me were ones I specified. Airdrops are different. I don't think that OgNasty should've collected airdrops via forum BTC, but collecting and keeping airdrops was not prohibited by the agreement, and the forum has no agreement-wise claim on those coins.

Topic: ~OgNasty's self scratching - page 4. (Read 3544 times)