Game protect comment : Too much nonsense at once, so I will reply step by step:
Nick reply: if anyone reads my responses, they'll know I put time and effort into being concise and understandable. My responses are not nonsense.
--
Nick original comment : I notice that game protect has: Trust: -16: -4 / +0 Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
Game Protect questions: What does it mean trust -16? Why does it say trade with extreme caution? What will happen if you trade with Game Protect? Whatever this means, because Game Protect does not trade!
Nick reply: by definition any business that has revenues is trading. Game protect is an affiliate. It uses affiliate tracking links like this one:
https://record.bettingpartners.com/_N8fI1aTNMPCX6ocCAyheuWNd7ZgqdRLk/1/anyone who registers via this person's website and loses money will generate revenue for this person. Game protect trades and makes money from customer losses.
--
Nick reply: this sentence once again doesn't make any sense. Game protect does trade through his affiliate website where he promotes various crypto operators.[/quote]
Definition trading: The act or process of buying, selling, or exchanging commodities
Game protect reply: As everyone can read on the
Game Protect website, we neither buy nor sell nor exchange commodities.
Nick reply: talking about commodities is misinformation and misdirection for the reader. You are an affiliate and you have a trading affiliate business.
---
Game protect comment: But let us assume some members of the bitcointalk forum follow your brain wash theory, I still do not get why they should "trade" with extreme caution?
Nick reply: once again you do not use English correctly. You talk about a brain wash theory. By definition brainwashing is "to make someone believe something by repeatedly telling them that it is true and preventing any other information from reaching them" AND definition of theory is "a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or, more generally, an opinion or explanation"
So what you're asserting is that I forcibly and repeatedly tell readers what I'm saying is true in a way that is theoretical...?
---
Game protect comment: Because if they sign up with any game-protect.com/qualify-free/ operator, they are not at risk at all compared to signing up directly?
Nick comment: you are an affiliate is in your interests to drive traffic and signups through your website so you can get revenue from customers that lose money. Based on my observations of your website, your information is so poorly put together, it is untrustworthy. In my view, trustworthy recommendations come forums like this where players have experienced certain brands and recommend them, or there are enough genuine reviews from players for the reader to feel confident about joining a particular brand. Your website does not have any of this.
--
Game protect comment: Can you please explain the risk part when signing up through Game Protect, while this includes consumer protection service?
Nick comment: based on my review of your website, you don't have a structured arbitration service. Nor have you produced any evidence of any legal action against an operator. Until you demonstrate your legitimacy, you are no more than an untrustworthy affiliate hustling for business.
--
Nick reply: I'm happy to say he doesn't rank very well on Google, but is doing his best by running stories about 'scam' operators. If you know about SEO, you'll know that content that's controversial gets higher click through rates and therefore is more likely to rank[/quote]
game protect comment: I can not follow what you are saying here, but our scam articles are usually on the first page and within the first entries. So if everyone would simply put "casino + scam" into google prior to signing up, then a lot of damage could have been already avoided! Examples: duckdice scam , pornhub casino scam , betcoin scam
Nick reply: your affiliate marketing strategy is to put out misleading information about operators, so readers mistakenly trust you to join operators you suggest, generating revenue on their losses through your affiliate revenue share commission. When people read through your reviews, obvious they are unfounded and badly thought out.
---
Once again, as a reader, you may find this amusing but remember this person trolls misdirects and misinforms for profit. If
you are a good citizen of Bitcointalk and you want to protect others from this predator,
please report 'game protect'. thanks
Nick