It might be easier to have a list of apprved escrow members for financial transactions.
We have that here, although the list is somewhat flawed given the collusion(s) in the trust system. 
Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act - page 24. (Read 11909 times)
February 15, 2018, 05:42:08 AM
February 15, 2018, 05:40:46 AM
This is a flat out lie. First off, CET is no competition to me. Escrow is something I do to keep people safe that trade here. It makes up a tiny portion of my revenue and takes up a lot of my time. It isn't something I'm threatened about giving up. I've been trying to get nonnakip to build a trusted automated system so I can hand off my escrows to raise donations for NastyFans and not have to do it anymore at all for quite some time now. Secondly, I send business to minerjones & philipma1957 regularly and used to send Blazed business also. I have left positive trust for all 3. I even praised minerjones' lowering of his fee to spice up competition and have no plans to enter his reshipping market. I'm not opposed to other escrow agents taking over escrows. Any of the escrow agents that people actually use will tell you the same.
The only collectors that avoid me are the people who have been force fed so many lies by you and your extortion cronies, that they don't know what to believe. I think it's time for it to be abundantly clear that you are an extortionist, a racist, a liar, and you do not deserve any sort of authority.
people are avoiding you as you are running a very shady organisation and anyone who speaks out about it gets hit with a red tag.. I have had numerous messages from people who thank me for speaking up against you but wont do it themselves for fear of getting tagged.
you can continually change the goal posts - shares to seats, BTC to USD - Business raising funds to charity.. whatever works best in your head to avoid any legal ramifications from running a shoddy mining op. But the facts speak for themselves, a multi sig escrow service is better than you. People dislike you due to the fact you continually play the "Victim" but you are actually a lonely bully.
peace out sweet cheeks.
February 15, 2018, 05:38:16 AM
Forums dead, no one will resolve scam accusations now... Scammers Utopia.
No scam utopia anymore for Lauda and his close associates. It serves the forum well.
As if scam reduction can be in the hands only of one, basically insignificant, member.
February 15, 2018, 05:35:47 AM
Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET.
This is a flat out lie. First off, CET is no competition to me. Escrow is something I do to keep people safe that trade here. It makes up a tiny portion of my revenue and takes up a lot of my time. It isn't something I'm threatened about giving up. I've been trying to get nonnakip to build a trusted automated system so I can hand off my escrows to raise donations for NastyFans and not have to do it anymore at all for quite some time now. Secondly, I send business to minerjones & philipma1957 regularly and used to send Blazed business also. I have left positive trust for all 3. I even praised minerjones' lowering of his fee to spice up competition and have no plans to enter his reshipping market. I'm not opposed to other escrow agents taking over escrows. Any of the escrow agents that people actually use will tell you the same.
February 15, 2018, 05:32:39 AM
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back? because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again?proof it
because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
But what if he gets hit by a bus?? don't you see that as BTC has matured there are better offerings?
you are young so you wont remember vinyl to tape, tape to CD.. but as newer better technology comes out the older stuff dies out - your Hero is a Dinosaur and I am disappointed that theymos is still backing this antiquated dog and not engaging 2 of 3 or even something like 3 of 5 for the forums funds. This isn't about OG's integrity it is what happens when he finally gets nailed for running an illegal security, or he gets hit by a bus? or his dodgy wiring kicks out in his shanty DC and he dies..
these are things that are all beyond your comprehension Killyou.
I remember when blockbuster closed
I am not saying that the fourms BTC should not be held under multi signature, because I think it should or else that dude that faked his death wouldn't have pulled an exit scam
I am saying because OG holds so much BTC it makes him trustworthy
February 15, 2018, 05:32:11 AM
because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
But what if he gets hit by a bus?? don't you see that as BTC has matured there are better offerings?
you are young so you wont remember vinyl to tape, tape to CD.. but as newer better technology comes out the older stuff dies out - your Hero is a Dinosaur and I am disappointed that theymos is still backing this antiquated dog and not engaging 2 of 3 or even something like 3 of 5 for the forums funds. This isn't about OG's integrity it is what happens when he finally gets nailed for running an illegal security, or he gets hit by a bus? or his dodgy wiring kicks out in his shanty DC and he dies..
these are things that are all beyond your comprehension Killyou.
February 15, 2018, 05:31:26 AM
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back? because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again? February 15, 2018, 05:30:34 AM
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back? because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again?how are they holding more?
February 15, 2018, 05:28:41 AM
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back? because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again? February 15, 2018, 05:25:35 AM
But, like, people really use you as an escrow?
why would anyone serious about protecting funds use nastyshack? really? the most pretentious poster on the forum who "is better than multisig" ??
really - a single point of failure for for an ICO isnt an acceptable risk - hence why OG only gets the tiny escrow deals now - just check out his public escrow address.. its not what it once was, well there is that and the fact that he didn't pay the BTC he borrowed back in full.
Maybe that is what this is all about? he wants Lauda off DT as Lauda is stealing the escrow business from him?
because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
February 15, 2018, 05:20:25 AM
But, like, people really use you as an escrow?
why would anyone serious about protecting funds use nastyshack? really? the most pretentious poster on the forum who "is better than multisig" ??
really - a single point of failure for for an ICO isnt an acceptable risk - hence why OG only gets the tiny escrow deals now - just check out his public escrow address.. its not what it once was, well there is that and the fact that he didn't pay the BTC he borrowed back in full.
Maybe that is what this is all about? he wants Lauda off DT as Lauda is stealing the escrow business from him?
February 15, 2018, 05:18:46 AM
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back?
February 15, 2018, 05:12:59 AM
I have no idea what CET is, can you point me in the direction of the thread?
but again, if you are apart of CET why does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2.
CET. Who would use a NastyShack when they could use Blazed? That should intuitively answer the question.but again, if you are apart of CET why does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2.
That's what it is turning in to. I wonder who worked for that guy not that long ago. Hm.
February 15, 2018, 05:10:46 AM
Well not really because why would anyone use you as escrow where there is minerjones and OGnasty. I understand they cannot be online 24/7 and you might fill a niche.
But, like, people really use you as an escrow?
[/quote]
Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET. A lot of collectors avoid OgNasty for obvious reasons. Pointless to talk to you apparently.
I have no idea what CET is, can you point me in the direction of the thread?
but again, if you are apart of CET why does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2.
February 15, 2018, 05:07:42 AM
Well not really because why would anyone use you as escrow where there is minerjones and OGnasty. I understand they cannot be online 24/7 and you might fill a niche.
But, like, people really use you as an escrow?
Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET. A lot of collectors avoid OgNasty for obvious reasons. Pointless to talk to you apparently.But, like, people really use you as an escrow?
MY OPEN APPEAL AGAIN, TO LAUDA, FORUM AND MODE HAVE BEEN ON THE REG NEG FOR MORE THAN THREE MONTHS.
Please take time to read through the links, check the dates I enter for the campaigns and you would see I was totally ignorant of the mistake of why I have been on the red . Thanks as you let me go off it.
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban? Please take time to read through the links, check the dates I enter for the campaigns and you would see I was totally ignorant of the mistake of why I have been on the red . Thanks as you let me go off it.
February 15, 2018, 05:04:21 AM
Also who is the third member after OgNasty and Tomatocage?Theymos?
But seriously why remove the most active DT member who is always on the verge to tag untrustworthy members from DT?
He also does not leave negative trust against untrustworthy people (although some may be untrustworthy), he leaves negative trust for arbitrary reasons.
"he leaves negative trust for arbitrary reasons."
Even where it is obvious that you could be honest in your plea. Lauda never looks back in decision taken , never listens to convincing arguments, closes channel for appeal and will never revisit decision on his own. That has not been fair to certain cases of red neg by Lauda.
Now these account (which already got negged by Lauda) back to neutral trust again after s/he got removed from DT2 and these cheater will start to cheat again.
You are not in that shoe bro. Some of the red neg by lauda are not deserving. They are irrational acts especially where the mistake is pardonable and where the origin of the mistake is not from you or you are honestly ignorant of it. All ya should check this out and make your judgement if I shouldn't let go of the red neg by lauda after three months and counting. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24275694
I PM Str1x account after 80 days ,response after some time because I understand he is busy - PM lauda.
I PM hilariousandco , no response.
PM lauda after three months plus for the first time after the open thread appeal, no response.
I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
What is then the place of retribution and pardon?
MY OPEN APPEAL AGAIN TO LAUDA, FORUM AND MODE. I HAVE BEEN ON THE REG NEG FOR MORE THAN THREE MONTHS.
Please take time to read through the links, check the dates I enter for the campaigns and you would see I was totally ignorant of the mistake of why I have been on the red . Thanks as you let me go off it.
February 15, 2018, 05:04:14 AM
...You are still invlouded in a signature campaign it looks like? So I would assume your income has not changed
Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business? 
Well not really because why would anyone use you as escrow where there is minerjones and OGnasty. I understand they cannot be online 24/7 and you might fill a niche.
But, like, people really use you as an escrow? and if people do what does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2, I don't think being on the DT list makes you or anyone anymore trustworthy so if you are or aren't I don't see how you lose any business
February 15, 2018, 04:59:34 AM
Then go talk to ShackNasty
Average Joes tend to be predictable.
Average Joes tend to be predictable.
You are on fire!
February 15, 2018, 04:53:39 AM
Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it
Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here)....You are still invlouded in a signature campaign it looks like? So I would assume your income has not changed
Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business? Average Joes tend to be predictable.
February 15, 2018, 04:52:15 AM
Have you seen any examples of Lauda changing his behavior in reaction to feedback from the community? I have no examples of this, nor do I have examples of Lauda removing a single rating in response to community feedback.
Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.Sigh. The other troll account should just be nuked by someone.
Jump to: