Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act - page 25. (Read 11909 times)

The 'good folks' frequenting the Meta and Reputation forums require a screenshot of your living quarters in order to make an accurate assessment of your 'shack' first. Until then - Lauda might be unemployed, has a severe pill addiction and is in dire financial straits. Because he has neither denied nor confirmed these rumors. Also, I am not sure that your mental faculties are sufficient for your duties, subpar at best they are. Clearly beginning to fail. I would implore theymos to run a careful background check on everyone currently present on the Default trust network and assess who among his higher-ups is fit to practice their duties and who isn't.

Did I mention that I am new here?

Yawn. When all of your lies get completely obliterated, you become so predictable.

---

Sigh. The other troll account should just be nuked by someone.

Being new here, and after reading through the archives of the forum I cannot find any evidence this is true, and a review of the tor logs, which I am an avid user of, it appears you are a dishonest person, so I am not inclined to believe you without specific citations.

Re, this:

Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.

Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).

It's attempting to mock nullius, thus is very likely to be you rather than someone else.

LOL. Since you very clearly intentionally are trying to create the false impression that you are new here, it is beyond even any unreasonable doubts that you are new here

Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it

I don't see any evidence of this being the result of community feedback, nor do I see any evidence of any public discussion about this person's ratings.

If you are looking for someone in dire financial straits, you should take a look at OP who was scamming for pennies per escrow deal or the other one living in a shack.

My mental faculties are very fine, and far beyond those of the colluders. Thank you for asking.

Wrong[1]. You are only stating these due to inherent bias from your own negative rating.

---

[1] I literally posted an example of a very old negative that I pulled a few days ago. Naturally, you didn't read this / chose to ignore it and spread lies.

No, owlcatz was never on DT. I don't understand why people think they were.

Such as...

Bitcointalk isn't Bitcoin. If Bitcointalk imploded, I can't imagine it would make most of a difference.
The majority of activity here is in the alts section anyway.

And therefore, until you post it, your evidence is invalid (not to mention that is likely the case regardless). That whole thread reminds me of the Craig Wright scenario.

"he leaves negative trust for arbitrary reasons."

Even where it is obvious that you could be honest in your plea. Lauda never looks back in decision taken , never listens to convincing arguments, closes channel for appeal and will never revisit decision on his own. That has not been fair to certain cases of red neg by Lauda.


You are not in that shoe bro. Some of the red neg by lauda are not deserving. They are irrational acts especially where the mistake is pardonable and where the origin of the mistake is not from the accused or honestly ignorant of it. All ya should check this out and make your judgement if I shouldn't let go of the red neg by lauda after three months and counting.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2376140.msg24275694#msg24275694

I PM Str1x account after 80 days ,response after some time because I understand he is busy - PM lauda.

I PM hilariousandco , no response.

PM lauda after three months plus for the first time after the open thread appeal, no response.

I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?

What is then the place of retribution and pardon?

Being new here, I have just finished my first extra-large bucket of popcorn and now I am left scratching my head as to whether Lauda is unemployed, has a severe pill addiction and is in dire financial straits, because he has neither denied nor confirmed these rumours. One might wonder - is Lauda's lifeline dependent on Bitcointalk and, most importantly, theymos' pity? Is he fit to practice his duties being on the Default Trust again, or his questionable mental faculties will cloud his fickle judgment till he is booted from the Big Boys' list once more? The stakes are high, the suspense is astonishingly palpable. People's incomes are on the line. I am reaching for another extra-large bucket of popcorn. Obviously, I don't need to add any salt at all given the saltiness in this wonderful thread. My finger is ready to press the Refresh button, my imagination running wild with what could be hiding just around the corner on the next page of 'Conversation Street' à la Bitcointalk Edition. I pull out my unabridged Oxford Dictionary of English from the nightstand, ready to find the most obscure words that ever existed in order to defend myself against the full-blown and dreadful assault of the slobbery,neckbeard-wearing, fedora hat-tipping, micro-penis-endowed human waste that frequents the Meta and Reputation forums. I dust off the huge book and run my finger affectionately over the content of its immense power. I don my crusader armor and prepare for the battle that will shape the history of the Bitcointalk forum.

Yes, but that is not the role of the system/position that is being discussed.

I have not. We just fundamentally disagree on what the trust system is/should be at certain points, which is fine.

Yeah, no. All the affected parties have long moved on, along with everyone else. Why don't you dig up the past of the people you are colluding with? Doesn't fit the agenda, does it?

Lie. Everyone who claimed their money was refunded.

No.

Nope.

All of those accounts deserved their negative trust. Creating a new account to spread the lie that I'm a pedophile is not criticism.

Easily debunked. Here's one user that got their rating removed just a few days ago.

OgNasty is inherently biased, has provided no data whatsoever and is therefore wrong. If theymos felt so strongly about the case, he would have either contacted me about the ratings or [1]excluded me already.

Again, a lie. See above.

Yeah, no. I have contacted no DT1 member even though the disgusting collusion was very obvious.

---

I couldn't address more posts in here at once, as I had to address the cheap smear tactics used by Quickseller.
I do expect that SS is going to receive a flurry of raging PMs by Quickseller and their alts now.

You either have to present the evidence or accept that by your own standards you have zero credibility.

Was this dude really on the DT ? You're talking about sides,is that how you took decisions while leaving negative ratings for someone ? Damn,I wonder what criteria DT-1 considers before adding such people on their list.

I don't understand why Blazed added them on the DT list in the first place.Can't blazed rather encourage them to do productive things for the forum such as Finding Alt accounts,reporting spammers and or contributing in the 100 other constructive ways instead of taking the short-cut that is leaving a negative feedback.

Yes I agree Lauda deserves to be there but not anyone else, I don't see anyone going an extra mile to do something good for the forum apart from leaving a negative feedback (which doesn't really help)

When someone has proof and doesn't show it, how are we supposed to believe something 🤔. Especially from a good ol trusty escrow scammer as yourself.

Be honest. You don't give a shit about anyone's safety when you have a change to bust lauda. If you had proof of ANY kind, it would already be out.

Don't try and bullshit everyone with your good guy act and not trying to expose your 'source'. It's quite obvious a very small part of the forum would be willing to deal with you, let alone help you expose someone.

GTFO back to your basement and stay there.

I do have evidence for what is being said in that thread. It is just not being publicly published. That thread has exposed another example of the dishonesty of lauda though.

Go to sleep now princess - your dastardly evil plan has failed... you and QS should find some other hobbies.. how about making nastyfans a profitable venture for starters.. raising funds in BTC then quoting everything in USD doesn't really make you a great authority on Bitcoin. Oh and don't get me started on your bad business practices of going all in on BFL that caused people who trusted you to lose out on hundreds of BTC.. I don't know how you sleep at night princess

I thought they lauda preferred non gender specific pronouns