Topic: Pain of a bounty manager. - page 5. (Read 1141 times)
Everyone should respect Bounty manager for their. But some manage promote scam project for Their benefit. When a bounty failed or scammed then broke bounty hunter hurts. Do i think, bounty manager should make deep research before starting any project.
being a gift manager and prize hunters is equally risky. but sometimes not all gift managers and prize hunters are honest. not hypocritical but both are equally bad. I mentioned directly, as a gift manager has the authority to cut the allocation of prizes after the project is completed and for prize hunters such as multi-accounts.
Almost all managers hired any hunters and I have a question - if it is obvious that most of the accounts are fake, could you somehow track this at the stage of filling out forms?
Yes we are talking about the hassle which the bounty manager goes through and bounties of good projects which fails and the development team ends up with huge loss, as a result, they could not focus on further developments and just don't bother to distribute the bounty tokens to the bounty hunters until the investors trade the tokens or else just shuts down the project.
Management's fault:
They tend to be greedy at one point of time and starts thinking that if they distribute the bounty to the hunters they will dump it anyway nad the value of token will crash down and they dealy the distribution meanwhile the bounty hunters start writing bad about the project and there were instances that the genuine bounty projects were termed as scam for this issue.
Bounty hunter's fault:
Bounty hunter just join any random campaign without investigating and then they are the greediest bunch(not everyone) I have seen while managing the campaigns as one user registers with hundreds of fake accounts and that too their account has followers who have nothing to do with crpto as most of them as desperate who just follows the twitter account by looking at fake DP of some hot girls which are often used by the hunters to gain more followers, moreover, the bounty users enter their ETH address on some other person's profile as well and if the bounty manager does not check that then the cheater will get paid twice and the person who works hard will not be paid, submitting false report is one of the main concern wherein the bounty manager has to check thousands of report and some of them just copy-paste old reports to get reward without working.
Then comes those users who keeps spamming the telegram group by sharing some scam projects and irrelevant stuff from numerous fake profiles.
I think the whole bounty process has become a shithole and the worst part is that the signature campaigns are not entertained by bounties as they want to reach wider audience without knowing that most of the social media campaigns do not reach any real audience as it reaches some fake profiles who follow the bounty hunters just by looking at their picture.
Regardless of the issue, the bounty managers are cursed as if they are paying out of their pocket. Users needs to understand that even bounty managers are paid for their job just like bounty hunters and most of the time even they are not paid for their hardwork. Even a slightest negligence from bounty hunters gets them a negative trust thanks to those merit thirsty users who tries to blame it all on bounty hunters to get a merit.
this is just a brief of not even 5% of pain which bounty managers go through.
it's better not to blame anyone for this and just learn from itManagement's fault:
They tend to be greedy at one point of time and starts thinking that if they distribute the bounty to the hunters they will dump it anyway nad the value of token will crash down and they dealy the distribution meanwhile the bounty hunters start writing bad about the project and there were instances that the genuine bounty projects were termed as scam for this issue.
Bounty hunter's fault:
Bounty hunter just join any random campaign without investigating and then they are the greediest bunch(not everyone) I have seen while managing the campaigns as one user registers with hundreds of fake accounts and that too their account has followers who have nothing to do with crpto as most of them as desperate who just follows the twitter account by looking at fake DP of some hot girls which are often used by the hunters to gain more followers, moreover, the bounty users enter their ETH address on some other person's profile as well and if the bounty manager does not check that then the cheater will get paid twice and the person who works hard will not be paid, submitting false report is one of the main concern wherein the bounty manager has to check thousands of report and some of them just copy-paste old reports to get reward without working.
Then comes those users who keeps spamming the telegram group by sharing some scam projects and irrelevant stuff from numerous fake profiles.
I think the whole bounty process has become a shithole and the worst part is that the signature campaigns are not entertained by bounties as they want to reach wider audience without knowing that most of the social media campaigns do not reach any real audience as it reaches some fake profiles who follow the bounty hunters just by looking at their picture.
Regardless of the issue, the bounty managers are cursed as if they are paying out of their pocket. Users needs to understand that even bounty managers are paid for their job just like bounty hunters and most of the time even they are not paid for their hardwork. Even a slightest negligence from bounty hunters gets them a negative trust thanks to those merit thirsty users who tries to blame it all on bounty hunters to get a merit.
this is just a brief of not even 5% of pain which bounty managers go through.
as of now just join the campaign that will put the payment in escrow
and for bounty manager, it is better to ask to escrow the payment for the campaign
About the fault of the bounty hunters, it is quite common actually.
They'll just register their entries blindly.
What's worse is that some also do the same in airdrops which commonly ask for KYC requirements and those type of bounty hunters tend to sell their information just for the sake of profit from a shitcoin.
They'll just register their entries blindly.
What's worse is that some also do the same in airdrops which commonly ask for KYC requirements and those type of bounty hunters tend to sell their information just for the sake of profit from a shitcoin.
I have long believed that bounty campaigns should be done only for projects that already working. s
Why would working project need a bounty campaign then?
As I understand bounty campaigns are done to advertise the project, so that it could raise funds to develop the project.
Exactly! That's the role of bounty campaigns and that is to help each other, help the project so you will benefit more, that's why it is so important that the one you are advertising were legit, or else you are just wasting your time in a couple of months that you are working on it.
For bounty manager, they should not be blame as we also know and aware what we are doing, so let's be responsible, we are not a kid anymore.
I have long believed that bounty campaigns should be done only for projects that already working. s
Why would working project need a bounty campaign then?
As I understand bounty campaigns are done to advertise the project, so that it could raise funds to develop the project.
I also feel that, it will definitely hurt when a project fails and the most blamed in this case is the bounty manager. just because the bounty manager is in charge of managing the bounty program, does not mean that full control of the bounty is held by the manager. so in the case of a project failure, I don't think the manager is to blame, but the team behind the project.
I have long believed that bounty campaigns should be done only for projects that already working. social bounties should not exist anymore, except Reddit campaigns. the most productive campaigns are signature and content creation for the project. I haven’t been participating in bounty campaigns for new projects for a year now because I don’t see normal projects and normal teams
It takes a long time to build a presence on social media that can influence the crypto community, making friends with crypto enthusiast with investors mind takes time also. MOst people into social media campaign are new members with fake followers and friends. Now I struggle to make post about cryptocurrency projects on twitter especially if am not sure of the project. I wont want to dirty my hands with scam project and lose trust from my followers like in the past. I prefer a working project on exchange, maybe new.
indeed of all kinds of bounty campaign projects I think only projects that have a platform of exchange that can get decent results sometimes they can succeed and what makes the bounty manager happy is the success that can be achieved from his manager so that he can make his name good and experienced in set up a bounty campaign. 
It takes a long time to build a presence on social media that can influence the crypto community, making friends with crypto enthusiast with investors mind takes time also. MOst people into social media campaign are new members with fake followers and friends. Now I struggle to make post about cryptocurrency projects on twitter especially if am not sure of the project. I wont want to dirty my hands with scam project and lose trust from my followers like in the past. I prefer a working project on exchange, maybe new.
I think this problem could be solved with a simple BTC payment for the campaign. No more participants must wait for the stupid distribution after working for several months. Managers must not be greedy and they should not accept random unknown campaigns. Then after proper due diligence, the team must use escrow to deal with payments.
Payment with tokens created from thin air is the problem!
I wish its very easy as you hoped, I know few old projects that do bounties can easily pay bounty hunters in bitcoin or stable coin but what about new projects? Honestly these new projects haven't raised a penny so where are they going to get bitcoin to pay hunters from? The easiest way is to pay hunters in their very own tokens or coins Payment with tokens created from thin air is the problem!
just stop to be a bounty manager if u don't get that pain. we see now just a few still want to be a bounty manager,such as artezy,bubalex,btcltcdigger. mostly bounty manager already die. probably because they can find a good project,or too tired to managing a stupid bounty participant with sarcasm language.
You cannot advice users not to be bounty managers, as long as they are doing it as a contribution to the bitcoin forum and to ensure that only the very good posters gets paid for their posts. Though there are few users getting hired as bounty managers, because even the projects try to employ the very few mangers that often work for projects(more than one at a time most times). This leaves the upcoming managers who are yet to get any project stranded, this doesn't mean they should give up on their ambitions as bounty managers.Bounty managers have to be blamed or are blamed if something goes wrong during the project, because it is them that the participants know and not the team behind the project, so as a result of this the managers should do everything possible to make sure they have control of the funds to be given out to participants. Selecting participants is also their duty, so on the issue of spam, it's up to them to remove users who do not comply to that rule and others, one way or another, the power lies in their hands.
Yes we are talking about the hassle which the bounty manager goes through and bounties of good projects which fails and the development team ends up with huge loss, as a result, they could not focus on further developments and just don't bother to distribute the bounty tokens to the bounty hunters until the investors trade the tokens or else just shuts down the project.
Management's fault:
They tend to be greedy at one point of time and starts thinking that if they distribute the bounty to the hunters they will dump it anyway nad the value of token will crash down and they dealy the distribution meanwhile the bounty hunters start writing bad about the project and there were instances that the genuine bounty projects were termed as scam for this issue.
Bounty hunter's fault:
Bounty hunter just join any random campaign without investigating and then they are the greediest bunch(not everyone) I have seen while managing the campaigns as one user registers with hundreds of fake accounts and that too their account has followers who have nothing to do with crpto as most of them as desperate who just follows the twitter account by looking at fake DP of some hot girls which are often used by the hunters to gain more followers, moreover, the bounty users enter their ETH address on some other person's profile as well and if the bounty manager does not check that then the cheater will get paid twice and the person who works hard will not be paid, submitting false report is one of the main concern wherein the bounty manager has to check thousands of report and some of them just copy-paste old reports to get reward without working.
Then comes those users who keeps spamming the telegram group by sharing some scam projects and irrelevant stuff from numerous fake profiles.
I think the whole bounty process has become a shithole and the worst part is that the signature campaigns are not entertained by bounties as they want to reach wider audience without knowing that most of the social media campaigns do not reach any real audience as it reaches some fake profiles who follow the bounty hunters just by looking at their picture.
Regardless of the issue, the bounty managers are cursed as if they are paying out of their pocket. Users needs to understand that even bounty managers are paid for their job just like bounty hunters and most of the time even they are not paid for their hardwork. Even a slightest negligence from bounty hunters gets them a negative trust thanks to those merit thirsty users who tries to blame it all on bounty hunters to get a merit.
this is just a brief of not even 5% of pain which bounty managers go through.
Management's fault:
They tend to be greedy at one point of time and starts thinking that if they distribute the bounty to the hunters they will dump it anyway nad the value of token will crash down and they dealy the distribution meanwhile the bounty hunters start writing bad about the project and there were instances that the genuine bounty projects were termed as scam for this issue.
Bounty hunter's fault:
Bounty hunter just join any random campaign without investigating and then they are the greediest bunch(not everyone) I have seen while managing the campaigns as one user registers with hundreds of fake accounts and that too their account has followers who have nothing to do with crpto as most of them as desperate who just follows the twitter account by looking at fake DP of some hot girls which are often used by the hunters to gain more followers, moreover, the bounty users enter their ETH address on some other person's profile as well and if the bounty manager does not check that then the cheater will get paid twice and the person who works hard will not be paid, submitting false report is one of the main concern wherein the bounty manager has to check thousands of report and some of them just copy-paste old reports to get reward without working.
Then comes those users who keeps spamming the telegram group by sharing some scam projects and irrelevant stuff from numerous fake profiles.
I think the whole bounty process has become a shithole and the worst part is that the signature campaigns are not entertained by bounties as they want to reach wider audience without knowing that most of the social media campaigns do not reach any real audience as it reaches some fake profiles who follow the bounty hunters just by looking at their picture.
Regardless of the issue, the bounty managers are cursed as if they are paying out of their pocket. Users needs to understand that even bounty managers are paid for their job just like bounty hunters and most of the time even they are not paid for their hardwork. Even a slightest negligence from bounty hunters gets them a negative trust thanks to those merit thirsty users who tries to blame it all on bounty hunters to get a merit.
this is just a brief of not even 5% of pain which bounty managers go through.
Well, if you look for the guilty here, the first of them is the project administration itself. Next comes the manager, who must study this proposal and only draw it up after verification. But why again the participants in the bounty are blamed, I don’t understand. After all, they are precisely the employees who, like investors, are victims of fraud. I don’t think that a bounty participant should conduct an investigation of this or that project, it should be done by the one who first talks about it, namely the bounty manager. And in order to avoid fraud, you need to pay participants every week in cryptocurrency, not in tokens, and then everything will fall into place.
I think this problem could be solved with a simple BTC payment for the campaign. No more participants must wait for the stupid distribution after working for several months. Managers must not be greedy and they should not accept random unknown campaigns. Then after proper due diligence, the team must use escrow to deal with payments.
Payment with tokens created from thin air is the problem!
It is difficult for new projects to do this way, they don't have the budget to be able to run a bounty with payments in BTC or ETH. In the early stages, the projects only have enough budget for the development of the project, and they need more money to implement an ICO or IEO. Payment with tokens created from thin air is the problem!
Personally, I don't really blame the Bounty Managers. Why? There are also victims here. They don't know how the project team final action when the bounty has ended. They are also receiving rewards like us. The tasks of a Bounty Manager is quite hard and requires high reputation and integrity. There are lots of cheaters in a bounty campaign and when the Bounty Manager and his team does their job, cheaters will be eliminated.
Management's fault:
They tend to be greedy at one point of time and starts thinking that if they distribute the bounty to the hunters they will dump it anyway nad the value of token will crash down and they dealy the distribution meanwhile the bounty hunters start writing bad about the project and there were instances that the genuine bounty projects were termed as scam for this issue.
Who are you actually referring to managements fault? Is it manager or the developer? In my experience its always the decision of the developer or owner of the project when to distribute tokens because they are also the one who send the token to bounty participants and its not mostly the reason why value of token crash after distribution of bounty no this is not true, one reason I can see is the developer itself dumping huge amount of token greed is the main reason why price is always crashed upon listing on exchange. They tend to be greedy at one point of time and starts thinking that if they distribute the bounty to the hunters they will dump it anyway nad the value of token will crash down and they dealy the distribution meanwhile the bounty hunters start writing bad about the project and there were instances that the genuine bounty projects were termed as scam for this issue.
I understand the part of the bounty manager, when all blame would go to him by the bounty hunter, first it is the job of the bounty hunter to do some research before joining a project,the manager isn't to blame when the project fails, the fault is from the team who didn't develop a spectacular use case, Repetiton of use cases makes the project not unique and as such little or no demand.
I know the feeling that is felt by bounty managers that is being blamed by bounty hunters on thier telegram group. Bounty hunters will blame the managers for not giving the reward even the manager already said the spreadsheet is sent to distribution team.
The people are just like that, and it is normal, they will blame for some people or for some reason for psychological reason, and we cannot blame them, but still it's just them who should blame their own selves rather than the bounty manager, as the BM also a human, he's just doing work for a living too and he's taking a risk on it as well.
just stop to be a bounty manager if u don't get that pain. we see now just a few still want to be a bounty manager,such as artezy,bubalex,btcltcdigger. mostly bounty manager already die. probably because they can find a good project,or too tired to managing a stupid bounty participant with sarcasm language.
Jump to: