Author

Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 296. (Read 784857 times)

newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
My RX5700 XT red devil works for a couple of hours and then hangs, miner restarts but for some reason hash 0.0mhs after that forever even though wd is enabled (standard).

The computer needs to restart in order to make the mining work again for a random number of hours.

This started to occur 3 days ago. Before that I could mine with weeks of uptime without issues.
I've tried DDU and many different and drivers.

Have any of you problems now with rx5700 XT?

What overclock settings are you using?
I'm using this in my command line and it's rock solid. Averaging ~52mh/s at ~85W for each 5700 XT.

-mi 14 -wdog 1 -cclock 1175 -cvddc 715 -mclock 1800 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2 -tt -36 -mt 2

Not sure if it matters but I'm using the original XFX reference models.

I was using this to get 54mhs at 115w:
-cclock 1260
-mclock 1860
-cvddc 687
-mvddc 687   (this hasn't any effect on RX5700 XT)
-mi 12
-gt 22

That works stable now. I'm using MorePowerTools to get to this low voltage.

I tried your settings because you got incredible low wattage but i ended up with 108w and 49,7MH/s.

-mi 14
-wdog 1
-cclock 1175
-cvddc 715
-mclock 1800
-tstop 75
-tstart 60
-hstats 2
-tt 36
-mt 2

Got it stable wich is most important. All wattage is meaterd in Phoenix Miner software. Not from wall.

How are you guys able to reach to low power consumtion?
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 1
I just notice recently that there is a hash rate drop on 1070 Strix using latest miner 4.9c and it happens both on nicehash and pool mining. I used to have a hashrate of 184 with all 6 gpu running with my current oc settings. But now it seem to drop to about 181.x and sometimes even lower till around 179. I have maintained the same overclock settings as before.

The idea of less fee is a nice one but if its at the expense of hashrate then its just back to square one. But i am curious as to why it happens seeing as I have maintained the same settings for almost two years now.

I have been doing a small comparison with latest current version of claymore but correct me if I am wrong. it seems even with the extra fees claymore has retake the number one spot for fastest ethereum miner on a 1070. Or is every gpu suffering the same fatez

 It might look like its only 3 mhz but not forgetting its per second. So Thats like less 180mhz every 1 minute.

member
Activity: 243
Merit: 71
looks nice

but i still not understand ports

Stratum Port   4444
Alt. Stratum Port   14444
SSL Port  5555

For 4444 and 14444 you use:
eu1.ethermine.org:4444

for 5555
ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555

Tbh idk what is SSL:// or without i wish you help me to understand

second
GPU testing is single 1060 6gb and when i run mining .. show me GPU1: Allocating DAG (3.49) GB : good for epoch up to #319
looks here something wrong because gpu is 6gb not using it full run

can solve it ?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
looks nice

but i still not understand ports

Stratum Port   4444
Alt. Stratum Port   14444
SSL Port  5555

For 4444 and 14444 you use:
eu1.ethermine.org:4444

for 5555
ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 71
looks nice

but i still not understand ports

Stratum Port   4444
Alt. Stratum Port   14444
SSL Port  5555
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
My RX5700 XT red devil works for a couple of hours and then hangs, miner restarts but for some reason hash 0.0mhs after that forever even though wd is enabled (standard).

The computer needs to restart in order to make the mining work again for a random number of hours.

This started to occur 3 days ago. Before that I could mine with weeks of uptime without issues.
I've tried DDU and many different and drivers.

Have any of you problems now with rx5700 XT?

What overclock settings are you using?
I'm using this in my command line and it's rock solid. Averaging ~52mh/s at ~85W for each 5700 XT.

-mi 14 -wdog 1 -cclock 1175 -cvddc 715 -mclock 1800 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2 -tt -36 -mt 2

Not sure if it matters but I'm using the original XFX reference models.
member
Activity: 221
Merit: 12
My RX5700 XT red devil works for a couple of hours and then hangs, miner restarts but for some reason hash 0.0mhs after that forever even though wd is enabled (standard).

The computer needs to restart in order to make the mining work again for a random number of hours.

This started to occur 3 days ago. Before that I could mine with weeks of uptime without issues.
I've tried DDU and many different and drivers.

Have any of you problems now with rx5700 XT?

Reduce the memory clock.
sr. member
Activity: 652
Merit: 266
Anyone know if 5700 works on linux ubuntu 18? Tried installing latest amdgpu-pro driver with and without the patch posted before, and it still only mines at 3 MH/S.
Check if you haven't set PCIe to 1.0 in bios, must be 2.0 or auto.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
My RX5700 XT red devil works for a couple of hours and then hangs, miner restarts but for some reason hash 0.0mhs after that forever even though wd is enabled (standard).

The computer needs to restart in order to make the mining work again for a random number of hours.

This started to occur 3 days ago. Before that I could mine with weeks of uptime without issues.
I've tried DDU and many different and drivers.

Have any of you problems now with rx5700 XT?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Anyone know if 5700 works on linux ubuntu 18? Tried installing latest amdgpu-pro driver with and without the patch posted before, and it still only mines at 3 MH/S.
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
Hello all. So I am using some 5700's and I can hit 56MH/s (can hit 60MH/s but way more incorrect shares) with them but I still get a considerable amount of incorrect shares. Has anyone found an optimal setting for a better accepted/incorrect ratio? On Claymore I only get 52Mh/s but 0 rejected/incorrect shares. Maybe it is just pushed too far and I might be better off going back to Claymore..

What do you guys think?

Thank you @Binary100100 and @joblo for your input. I was using a couple switches -openclLocalWork 128 -openclGlobalMultiplier 4096 which gave much higher speeds but led to a lot of incorrect shares. I re-adjusted a little bit ago and am only getting ~52MH/s per card @450W from the wall (3 cards). I think I might tinker a bit more to see if I can hit 53MH/s for each.

I was hoping that I can replace my 1070 rigs that have 6 X 1070's with just 3 X 5700's but it doesn't quite look like that can be the case. Maybe Phoenix will have some more optimizations up their sleeve to help achieve this!! ;-)

I'd hold onto those 1070's because if/when ETH/ETC goes PoS or ProgPow there really aren't many other coins that would be profitable to mine with the 5700 cards. At least the 1070's have a higher variety to mine with.
However on the other hand the 5700's are way more effecient on mining ETH/ETC.
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 102
Hello all. So I am using some 5700's and I can hit 56MH/s (can hit 60MH/s but way more incorrect shares) with them but I still get a considerable amount of incorrect shares. Has anyone found an optimal setting for a better accepted/incorrect ratio? On Claymore I only get 52Mh/s but 0 rejected/incorrect shares. Maybe it is just pushed too far and I might be better off going back to Claymore..

What do you guys think?

Thank you @Binary100100 and @joblo for your input. I was using a couple switches -openclLocalWork 128 -openclGlobalMultiplier 4096 which gave much higher speeds but led to a lot of incorrect shares. I re-adjusted a little bit ago and am only getting ~52MH/s per card @450W from the wall (3 cards). I think I might tinker a bit more to see if I can hit 53MH/s for each.

I was hoping that I can replace my 1070 rigs that have 6 X 1070's with just 3 X 5700's but it doesn't quite look like that can be the case. Maybe Phoenix will have some more optimizations up their sleeve to help achieve this!! ;-)
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
Hello all. So I am using some 5700's and I can hit 56MH/s (can hit 60MH/s but way more incorrect shares) with them but I still get a considerable amount of incorrect shares. Has anyone found an optimal setting for a better accepted/incorrect ratio? On Claymore I only get 52Mh/s but 0 rejected/incorrect shares. Maybe it is just pushed too far and I might be better off going back to Claymore..

What do you guys think?

Some miners on some algos start submitting bad shares with too much OC. If you OC back it off a bit.

Some share are stale because they were submitted too late. These are not completely unavoidable
and are exacerbated by high network latency. This should be the same with both miners.

Since Claymore doesn't produce bad shares it's a software bug. Mutiply the displayed hashrate by
the accepted share percentage/100 to get the effective hash rate and compare that to Claymore.

This assumes the displayed hashrate is not inflated as some have claimed. It seems unlikely an
unknown developer would appear on the scene and beat all the others in performance.
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
Hello all. So I am using some 5700's and I can hit 56MH/s (can hit 60MH/s but way more incorrect shares) with them but I still get a considerable amount of incorrect shares. Has anyone found an optimal setting for a better accepted/incorrect ratio? On Claymore I only get 52Mh/s but 0 rejected/incorrect shares. Maybe it is just pushed too far and I might be better off going back to Claymore..

What do you guys think?

I have three 5700XT cards. Reference model. This is what I use to get ~52MH/s @ ~83W each.
-mi 14 -wdog 1 -cclock 1175 -cvddc 715 -mclock 1800 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2 -tt -36 -mt 2

I don't think these will go much faster as is without rejected/incorrect shares.
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 102
Hello all. So I am using some 5700's and I can hit 56MH/s (can hit 60MH/s but way more incorrect shares) with them but I still get a considerable amount of incorrect shares. Has anyone found an optimal setting for a better accepted/incorrect ratio? On Claymore I only get 52Mh/s but 0 rejected/incorrect shares. Maybe it is just pushed too far and I might be better off going back to Claymore..

What do you guys think?
jr. member
Activity: 222
Merit: 2
dwarfpool is dead after 16 feb. but fee to dwarf. wait new version?

UPDATE! ETH pool is closing. Please switch to another pool by 23th February, 12:00 UTC. All balances will be paid out automatically.


 Huh dwarfpool is dead after 23 feb. but fee to dwarf. wait new version  Huh
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
Working with amd 20.2.1 drivers?
It works with latest drivers. However I get slightly lower performance with 20.1.3 and 20.2.1 compared to e.g. 19.x drivers for my RX 5700 cards. I do see others do not have this problem, so I wonder what they have done differently. 20.x drivers are also required for new RX 5600 Series.

It might be a phoenix miner issue as it looks much better in Claymore
I figured it out, Both Poenix and Claymore will not take the -mclock parameter anymore. Default clock is 1750.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
1 day running with a GTX 1080 Ti @ 21 MH/s and I have 410/0/0 shares. I use Coinbase as my wallet, but when do I receive the payout?

Pool = ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555

1) Your hashrate is ridiculously low. On default settings, with "ETHlargement pill", you should get around 45MH/s on ethash. Search the forum for the ETH pill.
edit: i did it for you: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-1080-1080ti-ethlargement-the-hashrate-hardener-3370685
2) The pool will send you payment after getting the treshold 0.05ETH as a default minimum. Read the pool's FAQ / info.
jr. member
Activity: 222
Merit: 2
i actually have a PM 4.9.c win10 with nvidia cards,users and dev a question, why does this software ask for more power almost every week to achieve about the same MHs speed, is this normal or everybody has these problems and can not do this automatically, i am tired of adapting it to every rig. greetings everyone eth/etc nicehash.
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
Working with amd 20.2.1 drivers?
It works with latest drivers. However I get slightly lower performance with 20.1.3 and 20.2.1 compared to e.g. 19.x drivers for my RX 5700 cards. I do see others do not have this problem, so I wonder what they have done differently. 20.x drivers are also required for new RX 5600 Series.

It might be a phoenix miner issue as it looks much better in Claymore
Jump to: