Author

Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 472. (Read 784877 times)

newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
Phoenixminer,
My rig config: win 10 pro, 6 x msi 570 gaming x 4G, mining at Nanopool, mclock 2030, vcddc 870, cclock 1100, vcore 950, fan 80%.

Miners 2.6 and 2.7a both crash win, BSOD. Claymore doesn’t, but it resets the voltages and clocks after sometime after the decree sessions I guess. Now I’m running 2.7a with -mi 8. This reduces the local hashrate to around 173 from 175 of claymore.

Please look into this issue.

Thank you.

Try give them more voltage and test the miner first. If you can run for 24hrs stable, try decrease the voltage. For my experience, the claymore hardware control is not so stable. I am now using overdrivetools to control. It 's easy to use.

Then Phoenix draws more power than claymore with reduced hashrate. I’ll wait. Thanks for the tip.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Phoenixminer,
My rig config: win 10 pro, 6 x msi 570 gaming x 4G, mining at Nanopool, mclock 2030, vcddc 870, cclock 1100, vcore 950, fan 80%.

Miners 2.6 and 2.7a both crash win, BSOD. Claymore doesn’t, but it resets the voltages and clocks after sometime after the decree sessions I guess. Now I’m running 2.7a with -mi 8. This reduces the local hashrate to around 173 from 175 of claymore.

Please look into this issue.

Thank you.

Try give them more voltage and test the miner first. If you can run for 24hrs stable, try decrease the voltage. For my experience, the claymore hardware control is not so stable. I am now using overdrivetools to control. It 's easy to use.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
Phoenixminer,
My rig config: win 10 pro, 6 x msi 570 gaming x 4G, mining at Nanopool, mclock 2030, vcddc 870, cclock 1100, vcore 950, fan 80%.

Miners 2.6 and 2.7a both crash win, BSOD. Claymore doesn’t, but it resets the voltages and clocks after sometime after the decree sessions I guess. Now I’m running 2.7a with -mi 8. This reduces the local hashrate to around 173 from 175 of claymore.

Please look into this issue.

Thank you.

After 4 hours and a half it stopped: error debugger detected. Running claymore again now.
full member
Activity: 357
Merit: 101
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Truly a great miner.

I have been facing a challenge when one of the GPU hangs, the miner does not restart.

It gives an error that reboot.bat couldn't be located.

Also, why is the GPU hanging ?

Code:
17580:04:04:52.516: eths Eth: Received: {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:04:52.516: eths Eth: New job #289abbab from asia1.ethermine.org:4444; diff: 4000MH
17580:04:04:52.990: main Eth speed: 57.131 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:16
17580:04:04:52.990: main GPUs: 1: 28.367 MH/s (142) 2: 28.763 MH/s (142)
17580:04:04:59.633: main Eth speed: 56.980 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:16
17580:04:04:59.633: main GPUs: 1: 28.374 MH/s (142) 2: 28.606 MH/s (142)
17580:04:04:59.677: eths Eth: Send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x36496db","0xdf1e1ca4401117200633d5a343be0ae9c05e3d9e630c497b76f2409afb2b402e"]}

17580:04:04:59.772: eths Eth: Received: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
17580:04:05:04.687: main Eth speed: 22.871 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:16
17580:04:05:04.687: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 22.871 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:08.344: main GPU1: 59C 17%, GPU2: 67C 17%
17580:04:05:09.686: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

17580:04:05:09.766: main Eth speed: 28.610 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:16
17580:04:05:09.766: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.610 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:09.778: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:14.845: main Eth speed: 28.609 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:16
17580:04:05:14.845: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.609 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:19.687: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

17580:04:05:19.687: eths Eth: Send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x34c999c","0xdf1e1ca4401117200633d5a343be0ae9c05e3d9e630c497b76f2409afb2b402e"]}

17580:04:05:19.781: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:19.873: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:19.873: eths Eth: Received: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
17580:04:05:19.923: main  
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth: Mining ETH on asia1.ethermine.org:4444
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth speed: 28.607 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:19.923: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.607 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth: Accepted shares 284 (8 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 2.82%
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 1274.3 GH (!)
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth: Average speed (5 min): 54.926 MH/s
17580:04:05:19.923: main Eth: Effective speed: 59.71 MH/s; at pool: 59.71 MH/s
17580:04:05:19.923: main  
17580:04:05:25.002: main Eth speed: 28.243 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:25.002: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.243 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:29.688: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

17580:04:05:29.782: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:30.096: main Eth speed: 28.617 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:30.096: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.617 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:35.175: main Eth speed: 28.605 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:35.175: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.605 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:36.394: main GPU1: 54C 17%, GPU2: 67C 17%
17580:04:05:39.689: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

17580:04:05:39.689: eths Eth: Send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x32eb4a9","0xdf1e1ca4401117200633d5a343be0ae9c05e3d9e630c497b76f2409afb2b402e"]}

17580:04:05:39.783: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:39.876: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:39.876: eths Eth: Received: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
17580:04:05:40.285: main Eth speed: 28.604 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:40.285: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.604 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:45.364: main Eth speed: 28.601 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:45.364: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.601 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:49.690: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

17580:04:05:49.783: eths Eth: Received: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x289abbab48807a4927ff272c8d39ff2d1460bd952c7228c4c98536ca6a554c44","0x4e99a30e99712c8c6e292fe7ba6b27a37c7ced12e2ec7862f31fb676724cb404","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x4df57e"]}
17580:04:05:50.442: main Eth speed: 28.606 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:50.442: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.606 MH/s (142)
17580:04:05:54.128: wdog GPU1 not responding
17580:04:05:54.128: wdog Thread(s) not responding. Restarting.
17580:04:05:55.552: main Eth speed: 28.604 MH/s, shares: 284/0/0, time: 5:17
17580:04:05:55.552: main GPUs: 1: 0.000 MH/s (142) 2: 28.604 MH/s (142)
jr. member
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
Running 2.7a for 20 minutes now without crashing. Previously it BSODed windows less than a minute after starting. Had to add the command mi 8. Hash rate is lower at 173. Claymore registers 175. Anyway Phoenix reports much higher hashrate at the pool: greater than 190 so I’m happy. Why is effective hashrate higher than local one?

My specs: Windows 10 pro, 6 x msi rx 570 gaming x 4G.

20 minutes does not reflect an accurate hash rate at the pool.
It will level out after a few hours. Give it 24 at least.
Your pool hash rate will not be higher than the local hash rate over time.
You're simply getting lucky at the moment.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
Running 2.7a for 20 minutes now without crashing. Previously it BSODed windows less than a minute after starting. Had to add the command mi 8. Hash rate is lower at 173. Claymore registers 175. Anyway Phoenix reports much higher hashrate at the pool: greater than 190 so I’m happy. Why is effective hashrate higher than local one?

My specs: Windows 10 pro, 6 x msi rx 570 gaming x 4G.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Where's the 2.7?

We all thought you were writing it.
What's the hold up.

 Huh

some people seems to test it already 2.7a
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 259
Merit: 108
^ great post junk story!

Still respect for Claymore, they’ve been huge for the mining community. Although they kept the 2.0% fee active for too long. They finally dropped the dual mining fee but it was too late and 1% given the scale of how large the mining community is now, is still too much. Good job for Phoenix for introducing a better product with a lower fee.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I take back my doubts from my previous posts. After 36 hours of running Phoenix with several rigs and looking at charts on ethermine, I can say with great certainty that Phoenix is indeed better than Claymore:

1) With Phoenix, the Effective Hashrate zig zags across the Reported Hashrate very closely (which by the way, is already slightly higher than Claymore's Reported Hashrate).
2) With Claymore, the Effective Hashrate line would be underneath the Reported Hashrate more often than not. It also fluctuates a lot.
3) With some cards, Phoenix run about 1 degree Celsius cooler.
4) The lower dev fee is very welcoming

I'm a developer myself, and I can understand/appreciate why the Phoenix Miner is better from an engineering perspective. Simply put, the Claymore Miner has grown to become a big messy code base with many features. It supports many alt coins not just for one, but two platforms (Windows + Linux). With Phoenix, the developers can dedicate their time on optimizing Ethereum mining. No gimmicks. I truly hope that Phoenix will continue to improve on the speed optimizations, and not worry about dual mining, Linux, etc.

Keep up the great work Phoenix Developers.
full member
Activity: 259
Merit: 108
Currently running 2.7a on two rigs - 1xNividia and 1x AMD without a single crash. 64hours nonstop and running very well.

Speed is better and stale shares lower than Claymore. So far very good.

Keep up the good work guys!

How much faster are we talking about?

1-1.5% faster with a lower dev fee. Temps also 1 degree cooler vs claymore
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 118
Currently running 2.7a on two rigs - 1xNividia and 1x AMD without a single crash. 64hours nonstop and running very well.

Speed is better and stale shares lower than Claymore. So far very good.

Keep up the good work guys!

How much faster are we talking about?
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Getting "debugger detected" crash no matter what settings I try.

AMD aug23 blockchain drivers
All AMD cards (2x rx580, 4x rx570)
I tried using the -amd switch.

Tried Phoenix Miner v2.6 and v2.5d

Please help. I'd really like to use your miner.

All software installed on my system:
https://image.ibb.co/cD0mbS/software.png

Update: I uninstalled Python. Still getting error.
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 16
I have seen a small 1.5-2% speed improvement poolside over Claymore 11.0 on my Nvidia 1060 rig.  Thank you.

My RX-480 cards are also 2-5% faster but not enough improvement to keep them on Ethash.  Their MH/s output has dropped 33% in the last few months.  Flashed a few BIOs and tweeked with Afterburner.  Is there a magic bullet to regain old speeds to 480s or is this the new norm for ETH algo?
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
Where can I download 2.6 without WIN10 Defender Trojan alerts, please advise.

disable AV ,download + install miner , exclude folder of miner ,start AV ...

or exclude signature ...
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Where can I download 2.6 without WIN10 Defender Trojan alerts, please advise.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
Currently running 2.7a on two rigs - 1xNividia and 1x AMD without a single crash. 64hours nonstop and running very well.

Speed is better and stale shares lower than Claymore. So far very good.

Keep up the good work guys!

yup , watchdog work fine ,phoenix 2.7a working fine , ( i desactivated a gpu in windows/hardware )
phoenix found a probleme and restart , good.

but i dont have see security about T°c  limit ,when a card reach 90°C
stop made it minnning for 5 minutes for cold down & restart it ?

im a bit crazy but i will leave rig 3 weeks .....

got usb watchdog key working fine , phoenix have watchdog for GPU ....
sonoff for restart rig when probleme

just "need" GPU T° check for security / dont burn/kill it ....
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Currently running 2.7a on two rigs - 1xNividia and 1x AMD without a single crash. 64hours nonstop and running very well.

Speed is better and stale shares lower than Claymore. So far very good.

Keep up the good work guys!
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
https://www.noelshack.com/2018-07-6-1518858272-avg.jpg

any possibility to connect to 2 pools or 2 account in same time ?
to optimise minning ?

im mining in average at 428 , last week i was at 428
now i see mining down & up , 24h  @ 380 mhs .....

can you look for optimise this way ?
may be ask job to 2 pool or 2 account ,and optimizes, saturated cards to work

yes it's may be 2h @380mhs and next 2 @476 , yes average is 428

but for me card minning @380 was money lose here ,
i prefert minning non stop @ 428 or more ...

any way to sature work queue ?


your work queue is already satured. when you mine, sometime you have good luck, sometime now.
app try to find the good answer, but sometime it don't find, sometime it find.
you can try with multiple pool mining but it will be same. it's never linear.

ok thank's ,im happy with nanopool
but i see minning speed change , when other curency pay more than eth
i work more on eth minning ,
when other currency pay less ,many come back to eth ,ans minning look idle ....
Jump to: