Pages:
Author

Topic: Please make your vote for the flag created against game-protect (Read 2846 times)

copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
I'm not so certain it's a good thing, considering that in lieu of the massively-tagged account, a brand new account trying to scheme newbies into his website would potentially have a higher success rate. On one hand, there is the constant "ban evasion" looming over future accounts, but on the other hand that takes time and is subject to circumstantial evidence (what of the argument, "i'm not related to gp and just advertising their service") if they're not going to sign up with the same network identification.
Instinctively, though, I want to say that I'm happy with the outcome.
copper member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 4065
Top Crypto Casino
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
It would be nice if they purged all of GPs posts / threads / feedback / everything.

This would be wonderful!
The ban is also great; it just took way too long until it happened.

His legacy will be... um, memorialized... in the form of a Bitcointalk and BPIP profile.

And maybe a bugfix in bpip extension.  Grin  (edit: indirectly, but this is how I've found it).
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
It would be nice if they purged all of GPs posts / threads / feedback / everything.
Kind of like erasing them from existence. Would probably dive them insane that their ramblings are no longer here.


-Dave
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 3148
₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(
Why I think there will be a ban evading event to be happening very soon, if it's not already happened.
Maybe check the last accounts created after today at 01:55:09 AM - that was the last login of the account. I don't think he/she will give up that easy.
We have to backup the database before the is domain permanent seized. /jk
legendary
Activity: 3402
Merit: 5004
https://merel.mobi => buy facemasks with BTC/LTC
--snip--
His legacy will be... um, memorialized... in the form of a Bitcointalk and BPIP profile.
Well, in the form of bitcointalk and bpip profiles AND loads of inconsistent retaliatory red trust ramblings on the profiles of anybody who spoke up against him...
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
game-protect banned = bitcointalk.org domain permanent seized!

Oh no...

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=game-protect

Quote
3/3/2020 2:12:26 AM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user

Also his thread seems to have disappeared.

Well, guess we'll all have to find another hobby now.

RIP game-protect... He was... a guy, or not, who was very... persistent. His legacy will be... um, memorialized... in the form of a Bitcointalk and BPIP profile.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
game-protect banned = bitcointalk.org domain permanent seized!

Oh no...

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=game-protect

Quote
3/3/2020 2:12:26 AM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user

Also his thread seems to have disappeared.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
game-protect banned = bitcointalk.org domain permanent seized!

If this is your wish, I am fine with it! Grin
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Can we please just ignore game-protect? Except when he's trolling random threads trying to rope in new victims, in which case report to mods for off-topic / promotional spam etc. Hopefully the third ban will be a permanent one.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
Because you're still a scammer.
You are still a mentally ill criminal, yet I neither see a red flag shown above your threads nor "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!" at your public profile.

Therefore your explanation does not make any sense! Roll Eyes

Stating nonsense in the name of sportsbet.io speaks for itself! Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
109 bitcointalk accounts support that h4ns withdrew his false red flag towards game-protect!

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874254

Why is the red flag still shown above my threads and why is the "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!" still shown at my public profile?

Because you're still a scammer.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
109 bitcointalk accounts support that h4ns withdrew his false red flag towards game-protect!

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874254

Why is the red flag still shown above my threads and why is the "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!" still shown at my public profile?

hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
You don't consider your email to h4ns to be a written contract.
The publicly stated and appicable laws do not consider the email I sent to h4ns as a written contract!

UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries.

For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be:

1) An offer;
2) Acceptance of the offer;
3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);
4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and
5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed.

https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/[/quote]

We do.
Thank you for confirming that 95 extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts knowingly support a flag containing incorrect fact-statements!


Nobody is going to change their mind that you are the least trustworthy member of this forum, and if you keep posting here we will always remind you of your scamming past.
Who did I scam and how?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
You violated a written contract,
Please show the violated written contract?

At what day and how did the scam happen?

We've discussed this point a hundred times already. You don't consider your email to h4ns to be a written contract. We do. Nobody is going to change their mind that you are the least trustworthy member of this forum, and if you keep posting here we will always remind you of your scamming past. Your business here is finished. You can leave now.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, AdolfinWolf, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, IconFirm, iluvbitcoins, Indymoney, Initscri, jimmyhate, Joel_Jantsen, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, Lafu, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, (mocacinno), morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, Ringg, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, sockpuppet1911, squatz1, stompix, Stryfe, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, thisnewcoin, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, Yatsan, yazher, yogg, Zwei

You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract July 2019

Quote
h4ns alleged the following, but later withdrew it: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Please show the written contract?
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
You violated a written contract,
Please show the violated written contract?

At what day and how did the scam happen?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Why do you abuse the trust system and knowingly support a flag containing the incorrect fact-statement that a written contract was violated around July 2019?

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.

You violated a written contract, and theymos is not on your side here. We as a community have decided that your email to h4ns in which you promised to refund his money constitutes a written contract, even if it is not a legally enforceable one. I'm sure you've sent theymos a hundred PMs. If he agreed with you and not us, we would have heard about it by now.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
Is bitcointalk.org a legal-free zone where everyone can abuse the trust system?

Seeing as how you, one of the worst trust abusers on the forum, is still here, there's obviously not much "legality" associated with the trust system. What are you even doing here? Every chance you've had to salvage your reputation you just doubled down with your crazy antics. You should not be in charge of any kind of business whatsoever, and certainly nobody should trust you with their money (or confidence, or personal information, or time for that matter).
Why do you abuse the trust system and knowingly support a flag containing the incorrect fact-statement that a written contract was violated around July 2019?

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Is bitcointalk.org a legal-free zone where everyone can abuse the trust system?

Seeing as how you, one of the worst trust abusers on the forum, is still here, there's obviously not much "legality" associated with the trust system. What are you even doing here? Every chance you've had to salvage your reputation you just doubled down with your crazy antics. You should not be in charge of any kind of business whatsoever, and certainly nobody should trust you with their money (or confidence, or personal information, or time for that matter).
Pages:
Jump to: