A max stake blockreward and blacklisting wrong clients and hardcoded walletnodes would help the network a lot.
Feels still shitty somehow here.
The way POSv is designed, a max subsidy would go against the grain. What is needed is for them to drop the split threshold, that is the only thing hurting us now, aside from cryp+bitt not bringing their wallets online. The network is large enough now, I believe that we shouldn't have any issues with older clients. I do agree that potlabs should be operating node1.potcoin.com, node2.potcoin.com, etc all on separate IPs, it would cost them at most 5$/month through a service like vultr to have a node that is up and running 247 to get people synced up.
does it autosplit after staking at all ?
Its allways the same fat 200k block that stakes here.
That is why they need to reduce the split threshold. POSv and POSv2.0 were created by one of the devs behind reddcoin for reddcoin, RDD has 21billion or so coins in circulation so a 2million split threshold works for it, the potcoin devs didn't realize they need to change it to fit the money supply for pot. It needs to be reduced to somewhere between 5 and 20k.