Actually, it is very likely. And the fact is that currently only idiots are wasting money on this shitcoin called NEM. I don't say petro is shit in concept, but NEM is the shittiest of shits. Considering the latest 500 million NEM hacking incident, what the NEM foundation did to the currency was completely incompetent bullshit. They tried to mark stolen NEMs and tried to convince exchanges not to accept tainted ones. What happened after that? Lawless criminals didn't care about it at all, and over 4 million dollar worth of money was laundered. They gave up marking only after they found themselves too incompetent to handle money operation. I also need to say that a lot of innocent people lost their money because of this stupid operation, because sometimes their wallet was tainted without notice of the owner.
So, in my opinion, anyone who use NEM is already too stupid, including ones in Venezuelan government who made this decision to build petro on top of NEM.
Another point which shows incompetence of NEM foundation and its believers are that core part of project is a closed source software. Good opportunity for NSA and other intelligence to pack backdoor secretly!
Venezuelan government is already relying on someone who switches off users based on ideology and mafias, which is NEM foundation who has monopoly over NEM core source code, and tried to censor transactions in vain.
This is a very wrong analysis of what happen to the
hack of Coincheck.
Actually NEM behaved very well in that situation.Coincheck was hacked because of their poor security: apparently their NEM wallet wasn't even using the best practices suggested by NEM and very well known in the community.
The transactions done by the hackers were technically correct and were accepted by the NEM blockchain as such. This is a normal principle of blockchain based, decentralised money: you control the wallet, without intermediaries. The only way to revert a transaction is a hard fork (subverting the rules of the network), which obviously NEM refused to do as THAT would have actually discredited NEM.
In short, NEM gave all the assistance they could by tracking the hacker's transactions and telling exchanges that those were criminals (which is already great considering it wasn't their responsibility at all).
Therefore you are wrong. NEM is actually a project with many interesting features (time will tell if it's great or not). You should criticise Coincheck, not NEM.
Your reasoning is also contradictory, as you say that NEM "switches off users based on ideology and mafias" which is false: they have not "switched off" anybody, obviously.