I also think the same about Hojlund with people who say he is not good enough yet because of being very young and playing in a new environment. At the same time this environment is a much more competitive one than where he came from. In the Serie A he was struggling to adapt and here it is pretty much the same - in the Premier League at least.
However I must admit that he was really great in the Champions League. He is still one of top scorers in the tournament you know despite his team's being eliminated in the group stage. Moreover he started to adapt to the Premier League recently as well considering his last performances. I hope he goes on like this.
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
Those who bash him are not good viewers of football honestly. They fail to understand that four of the five goals Rasmus Hojlund converted or scored all came from his own individual performance anf hardwork.
Manchester United wingers and attacking midfielder's have indeed created fewer chances for him to score goals. It's okay for people to talk about it because he was brought in for a huge fee.
Although I doubt he'll score up to ten league goal in the Premier League Competition this exact season for Manchester United. He's not a bad player, he tracks back and also defends when mandatory. He's gonna make history with the club!
Hojlund is at least trying to be better in the Premier League as well which is what I like in him. He doesn't just take a stroll on the pitch in the matches he play.
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
When it comes to the fee amount he was transferred for it is the truth that it is a big one. He was transferred for 74 million euros according to
Transfermarkt. But the board must be also aware of the fact that they need to be patient about him. He is only 20 years old now. Comparing him to Haaland wouldn't be fair as there aren't many examples like Haaland in today's football.
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
But in the long run I believe that Hojlund will also be a solid scorer.
Manchester United's acquisition of Hoylund is overrated, as the young player's potential remains unproven, where he scored just nine goals in play napoli one seasson. Prior to this, he played for lesser-known and less popular clubs. His productivity as a striker in Manchester United's Premier League team is also minimal, lacking the necessary potency. Instead of purchasing Hoylund, they should consider Harry Kane, whose price is not significantly different.
If Harry Kane were to even consider returning to the premier league, why would he think to join Manchester United? It would be a very big shoe for him to fit in, because he is older and may need to not play much to have a spot as a substitute rather than a regular starter.
Hojlund and Haaland comparison is also very unreasonable because they have different careers from different backgrounds and play different style of attack even if they are both attackers.
Haaland is more established and can take on a defense singly as part of his MO.
Benzema to Arsenal on loan would help boost the attack line but I don't know how much Benzema might contribute seeing he is new to English football and might require some adjustment period.
Also, could this not be a ploy for Benzema to follow in Arteta's coaching footstep, after playing for same club, he might end up just being the coach after a season.