Topic: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) - page 403. (Read 1199178 times)
CAn someone link to me a reliable website for the market operations for the Premier Leauge?
MU is always active in the transfer market and always brings great players who have fantastic prices. with that, MU is still unable to show the best in the Domestic league and also UCL, which means that their current problem is "coach".
now MU got the coach they wanted so the goal for the next season is to return that old good MU that we all used to see.
MU is always active in the transfer market and always brings great players who have fantastic prices. with that, MU is still unable to show the best in the Domestic league and also UCL, which means that their current problem is "coach".
Perhaps they don't give them enough time to adapt. I think coaches need time to adapt but i think United has turned in a Chelsea of sort where when a manager under performs for a season... He is sent away immediately.Or we should blame Ferguson for being too good
I still think Moyes would have done something much better in United had be given enough time of 3-5 years with goal player signed.
MU is always active in the transfer market and always brings great players who have fantastic prices. with that, MU is still unable to show the best in the Domestic league and also UCL, which means that their current problem is "coach".
Second is the departure of SAF. Man United never really found their footing since his departure. We'll see how their new manager does next season. He did quite well last time to be honest.
That is what I am thinking now that it is true after the departure of SAF. Manchester United Losing fangs that they usually play anywhere can win and in the end each of them competes always loses and even the bottom ranked team can indeed be with Manchester United. 
^ Mind the fine print everybody. Lololol.
^ I really hope the United gives Solksjaer all the time he needs and all the support, thru thick and thin no matter what.
Me too dogg!
I hope he gets a 10 year contract. Man Utd is a massive job & he needs lots of time to take them into The Championship
^ I really hope the United gives Solksjaer all the time he needs and all the support, thru thick and thin no matter what.
I think it is not even a coaching problem. Sir Alex Ferguson was one of the greatest coaches in the whole world and history but the dude managed to run that club for decades which gave him the chance to build a system.
Whenever Manchester United got a new manager they had to readjust to a new system and the players that didn't fit to that system even if they were good were cut from the team for some reason. That is why instead of looking for a coach that can give you success right now every team should be focused on getting a coach that will be in that team for a long time.
If they find even a semi-decent coach and let him run the team for 20 years they will have a big chance, they should not look for a Mourinho or Klupp or Pep but look for a person who is not as good yet will stay at the club for 20+ years, that is how success is built.
Whenever Manchester United got a new manager they had to readjust to a new system and the players that didn't fit to that system even if they were good were cut from the team for some reason. That is why instead of looking for a coach that can give you success right now every team should be focused on getting a coach that will be in that team for a long time.
If they find even a semi-decent coach and let him run the team for 20 years they will have a big chance, they should not look for a Mourinho or Klupp or Pep but look for a person who is not as good yet will stay at the club for 20+ years, that is how success is built.
We are in a different era or football.
Especially fans, cannot wait for 20 years to see their team winning a big title. We want results and we want them now. And it is very dissapointing to see big clubs struggling for 20 years and not getting titles.
I think it is not even a coaching problem. Sir Alex Ferguson was one of the greatest coaches in the whole world and history but the dude managed to run that club for decades which gave him the chance to build a system.
Whenever Manchester United got a new manager they had to readjust to a new system and the players that didn't fit to that system even if they were good were cut from the team for some reason. That is why instead of looking for a coach that can give you success right now every team should be focused on getting a coach that will be in that team for a long time.
If they find even a semi-decent coach and let him run the team for 20 years they will have a big chance, they should not look for a Mourinho or Klupp or Pep but look for a person who is not as good yet will stay at the club for 20+ years, that is how success is built.
Whenever Manchester United got a new manager they had to readjust to a new system and the players that didn't fit to that system even if they were good were cut from the team for some reason. That is why instead of looking for a coach that can give you success right now every team should be focused on getting a coach that will be in that team for a long time.
If they find even a semi-decent coach and let him run the team for 20 years they will have a big chance, they should not look for a Mourinho or Klupp or Pep but look for a person who is not as good yet will stay at the club for 20+ years, that is how success is built.
I think Manchester United fans are still in shock with what happened with Manchester City and how they became the better team.
One is the money that was injected into Man City which allowed them to buy top quality players.
Second is the departure of SAF. Man United never really found their footing since his departure. We'll see how their new manager does next season. He did quite well last time to be honest.
this is not a problem with money, Man United also has a very good income and Man United always spend a lot of money to buy expensive players in Mourinho era, in my opinion this is just a coach problem because it is true, since SAF departure Man United are no longer performing well consistent in every match
It is a coach problem and players problem because it needs both elements to work in harmony in order to be ready to win again for Machester United.
In Sir Alex era the players were great much better than the actual ones now and of course Sir Alex was a great trainer so that was the reason why Manchester United won everything during Sir Alex era.
SAF era lasted almost 30 years. Everything that happens is completely normal, plus some failures with managers selection. Same things happen in Real Madrid after leaving one player and manager.
Man.Utd spend some important time to try with established top players, like Falcao, Di Maria, Sanchez etc... they need to start building a new team with young players the first season after SAF retirements. Now they going to rebuild six years after. De Gea, Smalling, Jones, Ashley Yang, Valencia they all are selected in Sir Alex era. all those are the first choice (except Valencia) in last season.
Unfortunately, I can see the next season of bad results, I don't think that Ole can arrange team if they make much change and bring many new players as newspapers say.
I think Manchester United fans are still in shock with what happened with Manchester City and how they became the better team.
One is the money that was injected into Man City which allowed them to buy top quality players.
Second is the departure of SAF. Man United never really found their footing since his departure. We'll see how their new manager does next season. He did quite well last time to be honest.
this is not a problem with money, Man United also has a very good income and Man United always spend a lot of money to buy expensive players in Mourinho era, in my opinion this is just a coach problem because it is true, since SAF departure Man United are no longer performing well consistent in every match
It is a coach problem and players problem because it needs both elements to work in harmony in order to be ready to win again for Machester United.
In Sir Alex era the players were great much better than the actual ones now and of course Sir Alex was a great trainer so that was the reason why Manchester United won everything during Sir Alex era.
I think Manchester United fans are still in shock with what happened with Manchester City and how they became the better team.
One is the money that was injected into Man City which allowed them to buy top quality players.
Second is the departure of SAF. Man United never really found their footing since his departure. We'll see how their new manager does next season. He did quite well last time to be honest.
this is not a problem with money, Man United also has a very good income and Man United always spend a lot of money to buy expensive players in Mourinho era, in my opinion this is just a coach problem because it is true, since SAF departure Man United are no longer performing well consistent in every match
I think Manchester United fans are still in shock with what happened with Manchester City and how they became the better team.
One is the money that was injected into Man City which allowed them to buy top quality players.
Second is the departure of SAF. Man United never really found their footing since his departure. We'll see how their new manager does next season. He did quite well last time to be honest.
Aston Villa, one of the few english that won the Champions League (the others are Liverpool, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Nottingham Forest) is back in the EPL...Good to know that we'll get to watch the top teams at Villa Park, it's such a nice looking stadium 
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
I think it was sad they dropped out, big club, big organic fan base, but I wasn't too unhappy they got relegated back then, they were playing god awful football so maybe this will jolt them back into the proper way of playing football (whatever that is, NOT how they played 3 years ago!).
But say what Newcastle? Another Sheikh club must not happen! Don't get me wrong, I have little against the origin of owners, just against the origin of owners' cash;) I think even the Toon Army would prefer bloody Ashley to some absent rich oil man... unless they get another guy as passionate as Leicester (now deceased) owner.
Benitez will hope it's true I suppose so those purse strings can open up.
I think Manchester United fans are still in shock with what happened with Manchester City and how they became the better team. People hate the rich owners that spend to win until the guy buys the team they support, then they love it.
Club football in most part of the world are not just a team but a culture for the place they are situated in. I think commercialization of football clubs may bring in more cash but in long term would lose fan base. World Cup is famous because everyone supports their country. Likewise a club should also be restricted towards playing at least 4 local players and be owned by Local persona with at least 50% stakes of the city.
Aston Villa, one of the few english that won the Champions League (the others are Liverpool, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Nottingham Forest) is back in the EPL...Good to know that we'll get to watch the top teams at Villa Park, it's such a nice looking stadium
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
I think it was sad they dropped out, big club, big organic fan base, but I wasn't too unhappy they got relegated back then, they were playing god awful football so maybe this will jolt them back into the proper way of playing football (whatever that is, NOT how they played 3 years ago!).
But say what Newcastle? Another Sheikh club must not happen! Don't get me wrong, I have little against the origin of owners, just against the origin of owners' cash;) I think even the Toon Army would prefer bloody Ashley to some absent rich oil man... unless they get another guy as passionate as Leicester (now deceased) owner.
Benitez will hope it's true I suppose so those purse strings can open up.
I think Manchester United fans are still in shock with what happened with Manchester City and how they became the better team. People hate the rich owners that spend to win until the guy buys the team they support, then they love it.
Aston Villa, one of the few english that won the Champions League (the others are Liverpool, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Nottingham Forest) is back in the EPL...Good to know that we'll get to watch the top teams at Villa Park, it's such a nice looking stadium
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
I think it was sad they dropped out, big club, big organic fan base, but I wasn't too unhappy they got relegated back then, they were playing god awful football so maybe this will jolt them back into the proper way of playing football (whatever that is, NOT how they played 3 years ago!).
But say what Newcastle? Another Sheikh club must not happen! Don't get me wrong, I have little against the origin of owners, just against the origin of owners' cash
How much reliable is sky UK for transfer market operations?
Aston Villa, one of the few english that won the Champions League (the others are Liverpool, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Nottingham Forest) is back in the EPL...Good to know that we'll get to watch the top teams at Villa Park, it's such a nice looking stadium
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
I read that Aston Villa is going to get some fresh cash of 170 million because they got back in the Premier League.
This number is so impressing if you consider that some other teams around the world who play in the first division would never get this money. But, this is the reason why Premier League is the top league around the world.
Aston Villa, one of the few english that won the Champions League (the others are Liverpool, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Nottingham Forest) is back in the EPL...Good to know that we'll get to watch the top teams at Villa Park, it's such a nice looking stadium
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
Btw, did you guys read the news about Newcastle? The club is about to be sold to the Bin Zayed Group[1], the same ones who failed to takeover Liverpool last year[2]
1. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9164187/newcastle-sale-terms-agreed-sheikh-khaled-mike-ashley/
2. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1007716/Liverpool-takeover-Man-City-owner-cousin-Sheik-Khaled-Anfield-FSG
I think it was sad they dropped out, big club, big organic fan base, but I wasn't too unhappy they got relegated back then, they were playing god awful football so maybe this will jolt them back into the proper way of playing football (whatever that is, NOT how they played 3 years ago!).
But say what Newcastle? Another Sheikh club must not happen! Don't get me wrong, I have little against the origin of owners, just against the origin of owners' cash;) I think even the Toon Army would prefer bloody Ashley to some absent rich oil man... unless they get another guy as passionate as Leicester (now deceased) owner.
Benitez will hope it's true I suppose so those purse strings can open up.
Jump to: