Pages:
Author

Topic: [Primedice] Beware Guyz, Scamming HR!!!!!! - page 5. (Read 10608 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Weeeeelll said eritmos. kudos man... these ass getting for manipulation work now. yep richgang fuck that shit adm.
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 101
Its not impossible to hit 9900x wins close together. I did it once, I think something like 130 apart.

I mean, I was betting 1 satoshi. But if I had been betting 0.00020000 rolls, I would have won 40btc.

It can happen.

As they say "you were just very unlucky".

As can also be true "wow thats very lucky".

In regards to the above posts about provably fair; no comment as provably fair has zero effect on odds of rolls.
sr. member
Activity: 626
Merit: 252
 Grin FROM THE WAY STUNNA IS BEHAVING, I CAN BET MY DICK,  KKK DIDNT CHEAT. Stunna is trying to m anipulate the system now Angry
sr. member
Activity: 626
Merit: 252
Eritus,  that the best comment here. If I get 30 reds and loosr 80btc, idioys like nlco and stunna will say verify bets. Now if I win 80btc why not verify bets you usless fuckers. Pay that dude his cssh
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
I can imagin anyting I want. Yes asking someone for id could be so they track and kill or rob him. They have be en valid cases of similar things happening. If someone could go from 130btc to 0btc, why cant someone go from 0.01 btc to 80 btv or more. Why apply the logic on one side only.
Dosnt matter if those scammers pay or not. There are still scammers. People win bigger amounds on betking and jd and I dont har this shit

Yea, it's like when you are playing 2x and you get 27 reds in a row.

They say "you were unlucky".

But if you were betting with double on win, as in, stack your winnings into next bet, and started with just 0.00000010 and got 27 greens.

They would say "Impossible. Exploit!".

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
It's a 1 in ~102,596,558 chance to get 27 reds in a row.
But you don't bet just once, do you? No. You bet multiple times. Hence, more possibilities to lose.

It's a 1 in ~176,059,567 chance to get 27 greens in a row.
But you don't get more than one chance. If you falter on that 49.5% win rate on any of your 27 bets, you lose.

Do you see the difference in odds? More a 70% difference. 70% rarer to get greens than reds.

This is the house edge. This is statistics.

Every single wager you place returns you [statistically] 99% of what you wagered (given this h.e.).
Example:

You bet 1 BTC on 50% twice. You win once and you lose once. You get 0.98 BTC back.
You gained 1.98 BTC on the winning bet, and you lost 1 BTC on the losing bet. You "broke even" but still lost.

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
The odds are not roughly the same. Nowhere near.

Continuing on, the odds for red would only increase as you bet more and more. This is not an opinionated answer. These are raw facts.

Continue your ignorance, or face the fact that you don't understand how "provably fair" works.

Provably fair has nothing do with what you wrote. That's just stats. But then again - odds of losing 28 times are smaller than winning 27 times and you still be saying "unlucky, can happen". The point is, as you said before in one of your posts - "anything that can happen, eventually will". So it happened that guy won 80 BTC. Pay him. If provably fair justifies all strangest losing streaks, it does also justifies all strangest winning streaks. No matter if it's 1 in 100 or 1 in 200.

Plus, there is one more thing - security thing. If anyone's account gets hacked, PD simply says "it's not our problem, security is your issue". And then it admits there are exploits. So it is possible that account got compromised because of PD fault and not player fault. Yet we have no possibility to investigate anything, not to mention refunding. So if PD don't care about players security, players simply don't care about PD security. You have no right to investigate and expect refund just as players have no right to do it. Guy won? Pay him!

The only tool players have is bet verification. Suspicious about losing streak? Verify bets. If verification is positive, that ends the case. So I say the same - you have problem with kekeke's winnings? Verify his bets. No further questions, no further activities. How can we know, if it isn't manipulation? After so many days PD  can come up with any prepared "proofs" about kekeke's "cheating" they want. After all they are the ones who control servers. And they did extensive changes called "maintenance" in last days, so now nobody would be able to get the truth about how things really looked when kekeke was betting and who really cheated - player or maybe quite opposite.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
what is the problem of winning 80 btc? the chance of winning or losing is random. everyone can win or lose.
so, you expect all users to be lose, stunna?
it's not the problem. We already seen so many people won a lot from Primedice, also Primedice team always said "congratulations for people who won more than 100 btc" in social media (facebook), so they aren't expect/hoping all user to lose, also they have provably fair system which can't determine someone will lose or win.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I didn't want to post this here until we had finished our investigation but the user did indeed exploit us. I extended an offer to kekeke to return the funds before I post all our findings. I have a feeling you'll see an update from me tomorrow. I wanted to put an end to the ridiculous amount of FUD on this thread for the time being.
yeah, these fuckrs will hire a english writer now, nd will post a clean nd crystal clear content not abe to fnd any wrong int that, nd will say im cheated. do u offer? dear ass im not begging u. its my btc

I'm sorry I didn't post this earlier but I wanted to keep quiet for the sake of our investigation.
it will take time u want to read books, methods to fool users

Also, thank you to the majority of people here who gave us benefit of the doubt.
r u kidding?. do u still think people here r stupid?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
what is the problem of winning 80 btc? the chance of winning or losing is random. everyone can win or lose.
so, you expect all users to be lose, stunna?
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
one for one and 1 2 3
What can I say stunna! 
You are fucked.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 257
I can imagin anyting I want. Yes asking someone for id could be so they track and kill or rob him. They have be en valid cases of similar things happening. If someone could go from 130btc to 0btc, why cant someone go from 0.01 btc to 80 btv or more. Why apply the logic on one side only.
Dosnt matter if those scammers pay or not. There are still scammers. People win bigger amounds on betking and jd and I dont har this shit

Yea, it's like when you are playing 2x and you get 27 reds in a row.

They say "you were unlucky".

But if you were betting with double on win, as in, stack your winnings into next bet, and started with just 0.00000010 and got 27 greens.

They would say "Impossible. Exploit!".

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
It's a 1 in ~102,596,558 chance to get 27 reds in a row.
But you don't bet just once, do you? No. You bet multiple times. Hence, more possibilities to lose.

It's a 1 in ~176,059,567 chance to get 27 greens in a row.
But you don't get more than one chance. If you falter on that 49.5% win rate on any of your 27 bets, you lose.

Do you see the difference in odds? More a 70% difference. 70% rarer to get greens than reds.

This is the house edge. This is statistics.

Every single wager you place returns you [statistically] 99% of what you wagered (given this h.e.).
Example:

You bet 1 BTC on 50% twice. You win once and you lose once. You get 0.98 BTC back.
You gained 1.98 BTC on the winning bet, and you lost 1 BTC on the losing bet. You "broke even" but still lost.

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
The odds are not roughly the same. Nowhere near.

Continuing on, the odds for red would only increase as you bet more and more. This is not an opinionated answer. These are raw facts.

Continue your ignorance, or face the fact that you don't understand how "provably fair" works.

those genious are killing me provably fair has nothing what you explained it just means your roll outcomes can be proven thats all why messing with house edge or billion possibility
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
I can imagin anyting I want. Yes asking someone for id could be so they track and kill or rob him. They have be en valid cases of similar things happening. If someone could go from 130btc to 0btc, why cant someone go from 0.01 btc to 80 btv or more. Why apply the logic on one side only.
Dosnt matter if those scammers pay or not. There are still scammers. People win bigger amounds on betking and jd and I dont har this shit

Yea, it's like when you are playing 2x and you get 27 reds in a row.

They say "you were unlucky".

But if you were betting with double on win, as in, stack your winnings into next bet, and started with just 0.00000010 and got 27 greens.

They would say "Impossible. Exploit!".

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
It's a 1 in ~102,596,558 chance to get 27 reds in a row.
But you don't bet just once, do you? No. You bet multiple times. Hence, more possibilities to lose.

It's a 1 in ~176,059,567 chance to get 27 greens in a row.
But you don't get more than one chance. If you falter on that 49.5% win rate on any of your 27 bets, you lose.

Do you see the difference in odds? More a 70% difference. 70% rarer to get greens than reds.

This is the house edge. This is statistics.

Every single wager you place returns you [statistically] 99% of what you wagered (given this h.e.).
Example:

You bet 1 BTC on 50% twice. You win once and you lose once. You get 0.98 BTC back.
You gained 1.98 BTC on the winning bet, and you lost 1 BTC on the losing bet. You "broke even" but still lost.

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
The odds are not roughly the same. Nowhere near.

Continuing on, the odds for red would only increase as you bet more and more. This is not an opinionated answer. These are raw facts.

Continue your ignorance, or face the fact that you don't understand how "provably fair" works.

^^This.^^
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
I can imagin anyting I want. Yes asking someone for id could be so they track and kill or rob him. They have be en valid cases of similar things happening. If someone could go from 130btc to 0btc, why cant someone go from 0.01 btc to 80 btv or more. Why apply the logic on one side only.
Dosnt matter if those scammers pay or not. There are still scammers. People win bigger amounds on betking and jd and I dont har this shit

Yea, it's like when you are playing 2x and you get 27 reds in a row.

They say "you were unlucky".

But if you were betting with double on win, as in, stack your winnings into next bet, and started with just 0.00000010 and got 27 greens.

They would say "Impossible. Exploit!".

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
It's a 1 in ~102,596,558 chance to get 27 reds in a row.
But you don't bet just once, do you? No. You bet multiple times. Hence, more possibilities to lose.

It's a 1 in ~176,059,567 chance to get 27 greens in a row.
But you don't get more than one chance. If you falter on that 49.5% win rate on any of your 27 bets, you lose.

Do you see the difference in odds? More a 70% difference. 70% rarer to get greens than reds.

This is the house edge. This is statistics.

Every single wager you place returns you [statistically] 99% of what you wagered (given this h.e.).
Example:

You bet 1 BTC on 50% twice. You win once and you lose once. You get 0.98 BTC back.
You gained 1.98 BTC on the winning bet, and you lost 1 BTC on the losing bet. You "broke even" but still lost.

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
The odds are not roughly the same. Nowhere near.

Continuing on, the odds for red would only increase as you bet more and more. This is not an opinionated answer. These are raw facts.

Continue your ignorance, or face the fact that you don't understand how "provably fair" works.
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 101
I can imagin anyting I want. Yes asking someone for id could be so they track and kill or rob him. They have be en valid cases of similar things happening. If someone could go from 130btc to 0btc, why cant someone go from 0.01 btc to 80 btv or more. Why apply the logic on one side only.
Dosnt matter if those scammers pay or not. There are still scammers. People win bigger amounds on betking and jd and I dont har this shit

Yea, it's like when you are playing 2x and you get 27 reds in a row.

They say "you were unlucky".

But if you were betting with double on win, as in, stack your winnings into next bet, and started with just 0.00000010 and got 27 greens.

They would say "Impossible. Exploit!".

Yet the odds, roughly the same. The payout. More than 80BTC.
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 101
I didn't want to post this here until we had finished our investigation but the user did indeed exploit us. I extended an offer to kekeke to return the funds before I post all our findings. I have a feeling you'll see an update from me tomorrow. I wanted to put an end to the ridiculous amount of FUD on this thread for the time being.

I'm sorry I didn't post this earlier but I wanted to keep quiet for the sake of our investigation. Also, thank you to the majority of people here who gave us benefit of the doubt.

I'm simply curious. Stunna, you've been at this how many years?

PD4 didnt change anything. You added a "animation script slider", changed colors, and moved the elements, chat area, and menu options around.

Nothing server wise, in terms of seeds, hashes, back end, encryption, or even the layout for betting changed- at all.

How is it that people are able to exploit a site thats been running for 3 years, and has made God knows how much money.

I say publicity stunt. Just like Hufflepuff. It's all smoke and mirrors folks. Exploit? Seriously. There are no exploits.
sr. member
Activity: 626
Merit: 252
I can imagin anyting I want. Yes asking someone for id could be so they track and kill or rob him. They have be en valid cases of similar things happening. If someone could go from 130btc to 0btc, why cant someone go from 0.01 btc to 80 btv or more. Why apply the logic on one side only.
Dosnt matter if those scammers pay or not. There are still scammers. People win bigger amounds on betking and jd and I dont har this shit
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
I didn't want to post this here until we had finished our investigation but the user did indeed exploit us. I extended an offer to kekeke to return the funds before I post all our findings. I have a feeling you'll see an update from me tomorrow. I wanted to put an end to the ridiculous amount of FUD on this thread for the time being.

I'm sorry I didn't post this earlier but I wanted to keep quiet for the sake of our investigation. Also, thank you to the majority of people here who gave us benefit of the doubt.
Wtf. What a smelling fuckkkkkk.
Everytime someone wins big u come up with this shit. i have seen people loose hundreds of btc on your fuckn site. I saw a guy even loose 120btc on 85%chance of winning. Can I fuckn tell us what expliot u used to scamm him?HuhHuhHuh?
1. A 15% chance of losing is still a chance of losing. Any non-zero chance that can happen eventually will.
2. Of course people lose money. There's a house edge, after all. Primedice needs to make a profit somehow.
3. Why don't you wait tomorrow to see if OP returns the funds or when Stunna brings forth their evidence? Either way, it will show that OP was attempting to cheat Primedice.

That was stupid of him. Thats cyber bully at its best. Why the fuck must he submit his id. Stunna might send assassins to kill him and get his cash or just Rob him. Primedice is unlicenced.  They have no right to collect peoples id

Why would they even bother sending assassins? That's a wild imagination you have there. There's a million things that can be refuted towards those statements. Besides, Primedice hardly needs to "send assassins to kill him". If there's evidence of foul play, then internet history can be tracked and linked to them. As well as this, they make enough money on a daily basis, as you've previously mentioned (angrily towards them).

Also, OP has still yet to respond (with an answer that provides evidence) to my questions that I'd asked multiple times:

Did you lose any of your deposits in that timeframe? Do you have transaction ID's to prove that you deposited? (As irrelevant as this question may seem, it carries some weight)
sr. member
Activity: 626
Merit: 252
I didn't want to post this here until we had finished our investigation but the user did indeed exploit us. I extended an offer to kekeke to return the funds before I post all our findings. I have a feeling you'll see an update from me tomorrow. I wanted to put an end to the ridiculous amount of FUD on this thread for the time being.

I'm sorry I didn't post this earlier but I wanted to keep quiet for the sake of our investigation. Also, thank you to the majority of people here who gave us benefit of the doubt.
Wtf. What a smelling fuckkkkkk.
Everytime someone wins big u come up with this shit. i have seen people loose hundreds of btc on your fuckn site. I saw a guy even loose 120btc on 85%chance of winning. Can I fuckn tell us what expliot u used to scamm him?HuhHuhHuh?
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Edward just wanted to make some friends i guess or he might have consumed one too many vodka shots Tongue

Anyways, personally never had any issues withdrawing from primedice. If withdrawal amounts are big and deposit amounts are from a mixer, i think they have the right to inquire. Just my 2cents

Owners of gambling site shouldn't care from where you have money. If they care why Nizam deposit and withdraw from PD many times without any issue? If you dont know nizam just read about him. He scam+200BTC from bitcoin users and +50BTC from pd users.
For me primedice lost all reputation.
It is stupid to say that primedice already lost reputation.
I dont think so,because if someone wins really big,they just want to make sure he is not scamming.
Also there was no cases like this before.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 257
I didn't want to post this here until we had finished our investigation but the user did indeed exploit us. I extended an offer to kekeke to return the funds before I post all our findings. I have a feeling you'll see an update from me tomorrow.

oh and lets hear what kekeke gonna say about this
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
I didn't want to post this here until we had finished our investigation but the user did indeed exploit us. I extended an offer to kekeke to return the funds before I post all our findings. I have a feeling you'll see an update from me tomorrow. I wanted to put an end to the ridiculous amount of FUD on this thread for the time being.

I'm sorry I didn't post this earlier but I wanted to keep quiet for the sake of our investigation. Also, thank you to the majority of people here who gave us benefit of the doubt.
Pages:
Jump to: