There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin.
On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected.
On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected.
I have tried over and over again to explain this to you. There was a 1/20,000 chance than any individual bet on PD2 was settled as a loss when it should have been settled as a win.
Not 1/10,10000.
And the guy you're replying to was on the list. Twice. So there is a 100% chance his bets were affected. That's why he's complaining.
"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost"
You sir seriously need to learn the basics of probability
You sir seriously need to learn the basics of probability
No, he's right. While pre-rolling is a dumb strategy that only appears to work because it wastes so much time that it delays your inevitable losing streak, his point is that since he pre-rolls until he gets 5 losing bets in a row, almost all of his bets are "dust" bets, and so it's weird that his two incorrectly settled bets were for large amounts. You would think that if 97% of your bets are dust bets, then your two incorrectly settled bets are also very likely to be dust bets.
What he's missing is that Stunna's list of incorrectly settled bets is only the significant ones - he has already filtered out all the dust bets that were settled incorrectly.
IMHO that makes you badass. You decide how to interpret that word.
