I wish there was a way to make PvP provably fair. After qwerty331 just won a bunch (around 130 btc) I asked him to dice duel 2-10 BTC and he accused me of being an owner of the website on an alt account.
Which is obviously stupid, because clearly I'm not but he has a point. There is no way of him knowing whether I am or am not an owner.
This is why I don't understand your reasoning of not accepting investments. When I asked you why, you said something like, "until there's a provably fair way to prove I'm not betting against the bank-roll then there's no way I'll even think about accepting investments." With that said why are you letting PvP run? If that really is the reason you're not accepting investments then you should also not allow PvP to be played imo.
The difference is PVP is 100% provably fair if you play against your friends or someone reputable you know, investments can never be provably fair. I haven't been able to figure out an instant way to make PVP duels 100% provably fair, If you think we should switch to a non-instant system or complicate it further we can but it would probably ruin any fun someone could get out of PVP. If you have suggestions on how to make it instant & simple or some sort of replacement for PVP given its waning popularity I'll consider it. At the end of the day the incentive for me to play against other players on PVP and win a few bitcoins is extremely low while the incentive for a brand new investment dice site owner to have a whale win infinite funds is much higher. But that's actually a really solid point, I'll consider disabling PVP in the meantime if you think that is best it is barely used anyways currently.
Lots of massive winners and losers these past two days, I'll try and post some statistics later.
for now (also thanks for the above screenshots):
He managed to recover from a -150 loss to profit 2-3x before settling in at a significant profit.
. 
