Author

Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 1178. (Read 1990890 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
is primedice offline now??
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O

coinbase won't load for me either.

I have no problem loading both Primedice or Coinbase, and I am from Asia. Smiley

http://btc-e.com/ OFFLINE TOO??

And I have no problem for btc-e as well.

working for me too, Europe  Grin
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
is primedice offline now??
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O

coinbase won't load for me either.

I have no problem loading both Primedice or Coinbase, and I am from Asia. Smiley

http://btc-e.com/ OFFLINE TOO??

And I have no problem for btc-e as well.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O

coinbase won't load for me either.

coinbase not working too here. I'm from EU
hero member
Activity: 683
Merit: 500
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O

coinbase won't load for me either.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
is primedice offline now??
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost"


You sir seriously need to learn the basics of probability

http://www.pdfbook.co.ke/images/books/probability436000633.jpg


You do realise pre-rolling does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to your odds of winning. If you play 2x, your odds are still 50/50 whether you pre-roll 5 reds or pre-roll 150 reds.

Each result is independent of the prior. Your "strategy" is a joke

I know you think that, there is a 1% chance of getting 6 reds in a row, its TRUE however. If you ONLY bet after 5 reds, you're odds start on the 6th roll which is 50/50.

Reason why you think you have a 99% of winning is because youre mind is tricking you. You DO NOT have a 99% of winning because when you were pre-rolling for your 5 reds, there were many greens that you didn't bet on. Since you never took this bets, and you only bet after 5 pre-rolls, you're odds of winning are still 50/50.

Instead of continuing with this "WINNING" stragegy of yours, consider donating money to a charity instead of blaming PrimeDice because you have NO IDEA how basic probability works.'

http://www.snaptheconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Mom-Blogging-for-Dummies.jpg

Clearly you struggle to read. Your title '"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost" -why dont you finish what was said? You spead misinformation combined with your lame attemp to be funny, typical it seem of you faggots that defend PD without know the all.  You need to learn to read before you speak you stupid imbisil. I won't even say anything more because of fucking morons like you who butt in topics without any knowledge. 'Winning strat' of mine was meant sarcastic, I don't expect you to understand language much. People defending PD when they didn't even read the OP, or can't even grasp the content. At least some people can. Get a life you, this doesn't concern people who cannot be bothered to understand the full story.  Seriosuly, look this fuckhead 'consider donating money to a charity instead of blaming PrimeDice... NO IDEA how basic probability works...' mate you have a strange way of twisting things, I bet you couldnt follow a childrens book


Here is some help: http://www.readingpains.com/books.html
Overcoming Dyslexia for Dummies
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
I'm a fan of the "pre-rolling" strategy. It does not make it right or correct, just that the odds of rolling so many losses or wins in a row, as a whole is a different probability than when rolling per individual event.

Stunna, if you're looking for an idea on how to do a giveaway, I have an idea. It's called "Purposely Rigged Lotto" ... hehehe. Smiley I'm serious. There will be a winner, we just have to pick who.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost"


You sir seriously need to learn the basics of probability




You do realise pre-rolling does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to your odds of winning. If you play 2x, your odds are still 50/50 whether you pre-roll 5 reds or pre-roll 150 reds.

Each result is independent of the prior. Your "strategy" is a joke

I know you think that, there is a 1% chance of getting 6 reds in a row, its TRUE however. If you ONLY bet after 5 reds, you're odds start on the 6th roll which is 50/50.

Reason why you think you have a 99% of winning is because youre mind is tricking you. You DO NOT have a 99% of winning because when you were pre-rolling for your 5 reds, there were many greens that you didn't bet on. Since you never took this bets, and you only bet after 5 pre-rolls, you're odds of winning are still 50/50.

Instead of continuing with this "WINNING" stragegy of yours, consider donating money to a charity instead of blaming PrimeDice because you have NO IDEA how basic probability works.'



member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
thanks

oh wow its the 10,000th post

usernme on PD - babbud

thanks any tips welcomed Smiley

I think I deleted one of my posts to help you achieve the goal Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1037
Oldschool!
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.

There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin.

On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected. On the highest payout though the edge was more-so effected but there weren't really any significant sized bets made at that payout, almost exclusively faucet bets. No rolls were manipulated the edge was literally just 0.01% more than advertised. This was disclosed to us after PD3 had already launched with a system that seems to definitively be 1%.


Lain's logic isn't exactly sound, he was offered a refund + bonus but believes that his betting decisions made were effected by that loss. I'm willing to look into it not because he is right but simply because the cost will likely be extremely minimal if anything at all (if he won the bet after then it wouldn't matter) and because I want him to be satisfied. @lain I responded to your email earlier today, should have more on the weekend, as I've said though it is highly unlikely it effected a large martingale series granted how many bets you've made.

Thanks Stunna, I now rest assured that the correct result will be looked into. I am glad that at least not everybody got confused about what I was saying, I was not question all other bets, only the ones straight  after these affected bets. (there were 2) It's also feels weird that 2 of my bets were victim of this, I must the most unlucky guy ever haha as it was like 0.05 over lol

PS You still seem very confused Mirco, seriously, are you high man? I am not asking for the results of some theoretical roll, just the result of my next roll.


As always , better to wait for The man to give his word than argue it for nothing Smiley . Hehe...

I can't agree with u, or it might been just an misunderstanding. I just wouldn't pay attention to ur next roll , no matter if it was win or loss.
But ok u lost that money , not me.

Cheers Lain33 Smiley .
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.

There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin.

On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected. On the highest payout though the edge was more-so effected but there weren't really any significant sized bets made at that payout, almost exclusively faucet bets. No rolls were manipulated the edge was literally just 0.01% more than advertised. This was disclosed to us after PD3 had already launched with a system that seems to definitively be 1%.


Lain's logic isn't exactly sound, he was offered a refund + bonus but believes that his betting decisions made were effected by that loss. I'm willing to look into it not because he is right but simply because the cost will likely be extremely minimal if anything at all (if he won the bet after then it wouldn't matter) and because I want him to be satisfied. @lain I responded to your email earlier today, should have more on the weekend, as I've said though it is highly unlikely it effected a large martingale series granted how many bets you've made.

Thanks Stunna, I now rest assured that the correct result will be looked into. I am glad that at least not everybody got confused about what I was saying, I was not question all other bets, only the ones straight  after these affected bets. (there were 2) It's also feels weird that 2 of my bets were victim of this, I must the most unlucky guy ever haha as it was like 0.05 over lol

PS You still seem very confused Mirco, seriously, are you high man? I am not asking for the results of some theoretical roll, just the result of my next rolls (I say rolls in plural as  there were 2 best.. I fear I confuse you more..)
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1037
Oldschool!
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.

There is no "this run" . It could be the run till pd2 got closed. Come on be reasonable.

I will not discuss this anymore. There is just no way to inspect every "run" on pd2 on every bet that didn't round properly .
U will get ur money back for each bet that was settled incorrectly . And that is it.

Sorry for bad sense of humor in previous posts. Its just that what u are saying (atleast to me) doesn't make any sense .

Btw, everybody who is on that list should contact [email protected] and they will refund u.

Cheers.

Noo Micro... :/ I mean, if on the very next bet I doubled and lost as a result I am have been duped. I would not have doubled up if I never lost the next bet, and thus I have lost a large amount. If I had won the bet then I would have staring pre-rolling or reverting to my lower base bet. It seem to me, although it may not be, suspicious that this flaw would happen on such a significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost 1 million bets...
On a further note, PD has contacted me back. The developed who handles the PD2 database is gone for a few days it seems but they will apparently look into is. I don't know why Micro is speaking on behalf of PD regarding this serious matter, I am in contact with support though. Let's see what happens Smiley

I don't speak on behalf of PD. I speak my own opinion.

And what u are telling is only what u say. If u won that bet u might stopped betting, u might went all in. U say u know what u would do but nobody else does. Its just un provable . That's what i was trying to say. They can't read minds, and they can't refund "what would happen if didn't happen" .
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.

There is no "this run" . It could be the run till pd2 got closed. Come on be reasonable.

I will not discuss this anymore. There is just no way to inspect every "run" on pd2 on every bet that didn't round properly .
U will get ur money back for each bet that was settled incorrectly . And that is it.

Sorry for bad sense of humor in previous posts. Its just that what u are saying (atleast to me) doesn't make any sense .

Btw, everybody who is on that list should contact [email protected] and they will refund u.

Cheers.

Noo Micro... :/ I mean, if on the very next bet I doubled and lost as a result I am have been duped. I would not have doubled up if I never lost the next bet, and thus I have lost a large amount. If I had won the bet then I would have starting pre-rolling or reverting to my lower base bet. It seem to me, although it may not be, suspicious that this flaw would happen on such a significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost 1 million bets...
On a further note, PD has contacted me back. The developer who handles the PD2 database or something is gone for a few days it seems but they will apparently look into is. I don't know why Micro is speaking on behalf of PD regarding this serious matter, I am in contact with support though. Let's see what happens Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.

There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin.

On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected. On the highest payout though the edge was more-so effected but there weren't really any significant sized bets made at that payout, almost exclusively faucet bets. No rolls were manipulated the edge was literally just 0.01% more than advertised. This was disclosed to us after PD3 had already launched with a system that seems to definitively be 1%. Obviously this wasn't intentional and the effects were much more minimal than I initially thought from what we've seen so far.


Lain's logic isn't exactly sound, he was offered a refund + bonus but believes that his betting decisions made were effected by that loss. I'm willing to look into it not because he is right but simply because the cost will likely be extremely minimal if anything at all (if he won the bet after then it wouldn't matter) and because I want him to be satisfied. @lain I responded to your email earlier today, should have more on the weekend, as I've said though it is highly unlikely it effected a large martingale series granted how many bets you've made.


With regards to the promised giveaways, the 1B giveaway was a lot of fun and I'm thinking up some ideas for the near future, open to suggestions.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!
Any release dates for the next giveaway? I heard that they would announce it right after but I have yet to hear that.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1037
Oldschool!
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.

There is no "this run" . It could be the run till pd2 got closed. Come on be reasonable.

I will not discuss this anymore. There is just no way to inspect every "run" on pd2 on every bet that didn't round properly .
U will get ur money back for each bet that was settled incorrectly . And that is it.

Sorry for bad sense of humor in previous posts. Its just that what u are saying (atleast to me) doesn't make any sense .

Btw, everybody who is on that list should contact [email protected] and they will refund u.

Cheers.
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.

Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.

Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect.
YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking.

This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me...where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?

Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support.

You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1037
Oldschool!
Here :

around 37,500 bets were settled as losses when they should have been wins...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8441727


I think we all band together and ask for our money back. I am going to start a campaign for this! No more stealing and excuses!


Some of that is already settled. And its less than 37k even thou that should be around there . Mostly bets on high payouts like 9900x ware affected.

And pd3 is not affected by that.

Around 1 in 20,000 of all bets before PD3 will have been affected, regardless of payout multiplier. All bets had a chance of winning that was 0.005% less than advertised.

I'm not sure where the idea that only high-multiplier bets were affected came from; they're just as likely to be affected as any other bet.

Here's the current list of unclaimed rounded bets from PD2 at 2x multiplier. We ignored bets below a certain threshold (faucet bets).


Code:
Sarah: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.25600000000000000000
jp1966: 49.5 was 32.673 @ 0.10240000000000000000
Sisoje: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.10240000000000000000
grigina: 50.5 was 50.501 @ 0.09102816000000000000
Zodiac: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.05000000000000000000
Purcell: 49.5 was 1.021 @ 0.04000000000000000000
hhhr: 50.5 was 50.499 @ 0.04000000000000000000
lucaspm982: 50.5 was 50.498 @ 0.03500000000000000000
Bright: 50.5 was 48.864 @ 0.03418000000000000000
Toje: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.03242097000000000000
Skeppy: 49.5 was 49.498 @ 0.02500000000000000000
Wavey: 49.5 was 38.559 @ 0.02000000000000000000
Tuffies78: 50.5 was 32.794 @ 0.02000000000000000000
Lain33: 49.5 was 49.495 @ 0.02000000000000000000
IZACS: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.01600000000000000000
Eltan: 50.5 was 7.44 @ 0.01600000000000000000
Zodiac: 49.5 was 49.504 @ 0.01600000000000000000
miloslim1: 49.5 was 49.498 @ 0.01280000000000000000
murcury12345: 49.5 was 55.929 @ 0.01280000000000000000
jp1966: 49.5 was 40.572 @ 0.01280000000000000000
TinaTTMM: 50.5 was 50.495 @ 0.01200000000000000000
applesauce1: 49.5 was 49.496 @ 0.01111110000000000000
yoo3311: 49.5 was 56.772 @ 0.01100000000000000000
shinet: 49.5 was 49.496 @ 0.01040006000000000000
ORANGEDEVE: 50.5 was 50.502 @ 0.01031520000000000000
maniana: 49.5 was 49.498 @ 0.01024000000000000000
amigo: 50.5 was 50.496 @ 0.01024000000000000000
troyrPD: 49.5 was 49.495 @ 0.01000000000000000000
keylo: 49.5 was 49.504 @ 0.01000000000000000000
Ashlamar: 49.5 was 40.899 @ 0.01000000000000000000
Lain33: 49.5 was 49.505 @ 0.01000000000000000000
hemp: 50.5 was 50.497 @ 0.01000000000000000000
davida: 49.5 was 62.537 @ 0.01000000000000000000
btcboss: 50.5 was 50.496 @ 0.01000000000000000000
amigo: 49.5 was 49.495 @ 0.01000000000000000000
ultima32: 49.5 was 49.498 @ 0.00952300000000000000
playerone: 49.5 was 49.503 @ 0.00909855000000000000
hui: 49.5 was 49.505 @ 0.00900000000000000000
mephy: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.00800000000000000000
blizard2014: 49.5 was 49.503 @ 0.00800000000000000000
hegel: 49.5 was 70.863 @ 0.00800000000000000000
Lan: 49.5 was 49.504 @ 0.00753147000000000000
topo: 50.5 was 50.495 @ 0.00692155000000000000
mephy: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.00672000000000000000
coinad: 49.5 was 49.502 @ 0.00645069000000000000
robertus: 50.5 was 95.434 @ 0.00640000000000000000
cheifkeef: 50.5 was 31.207 @ 0.00640000000000000000
fritzzz25: 49.5 was 49.498 @ 0.00640000000000000000
keylow: 49.5 was 49.496 @ 0.00620000000000000000
daimon: 49.5 was 49.503 @ 0.00524288000000000000
Blcsa: 49.5 was 49.503 @ 0.00500000000000000000
timmmm: 49.5 was 68.621 @ 0.00500000000000000000
Mates1337: 49.5 was 49.502 @ 0.00500000000000000000
timmmm: 49.5 was 45.5 @ 0.00500000000000000000
dobe: 50.5 was 50.496 @ 0.00500000000000000000
Draiko: 49.5 was 49.503 @ 0.00447200000000000000
Mitchel87: 50.5 was 50.502 @ 0.00409600000000000000
vifit: 50.5 was 50.502 @ 0.00400000000000000000
ruude25: 50.5 was 50.501 @ 0.00400000000000000000
Kit1234567: 50.5 was 50.499 @ 0.00400000000000000000
Draiko: 49.5 was 49.667 @ 0.00400000000000000000
jp1966: 49.5 was 49.504 @ 0.00400000000000000000
Bjorn1010: 49.5 was 49.505 @ 0.00370000000000000000
playerone: 50.5 was 50.504 @ 0.00356516000000000000
ultima32: 49.5 was 49.503 @ 0.00339300000000000000
bithero: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.00320000000000000000
Didldak: 49.5 was 80.194 @ 0.00320000000000000000
pale: 49.5 was 49.496 @ 0.00320000000000000000
xxChange: 49.5 was 49.496 @ 0.00279848000000000000
blank: 49.5 was 49.502 @ 0.00262144000000000000
bithero: 49.5 was 24.276 @ 0.00262144000000000000
BTCwillRISE: 50.5 was 50.495 @ 0.00250000000000000000
Androee: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.00250000000000000000
istanbulll: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.00250000000000000000
Yoshiiiiiii: 49.5 was 49.498 @ 0.00210000000000000000
WhyMeNoWin: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.00209995000000000000
tryingagain: 49.5 was 49.504 @ 0.00209712000000000000
nznl: 50.5 was 50.501 @ 0.00202816000000000000
Zodiac: 49.5 was 53.153 @ 0.00200000000000000000
omarhesa: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.00200000000000000000
xsdman923x: 49.5 was 69.914 @ 0.00200000000000000000
zyndr1: 49.5 was 49.504 @ 0.00200000000000000000
dakota: 49.5 was 39.319 @ 0.00200000000000000000
mishel: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.00200000000000000000
zyndr1: 49.5 was 49.497 @ 0.00200000000000000000
bithero: 49.5 was 49.501 @ 0.00200000000000000000
elmagico: 50.5 was 50.503 @ 0.00200000000000000000
omrgg: 49.5 was 49.502 @ 0.00200000000000000000
keylow: 49.5 was 49.499 @ 0.00200000000000000000
POSITIVE: 49.5 was 49.496 @ 0.00200000000000000000
iheartubuntu: 49.5 was 49.497 @ 0.00200000000000000000

Also I hope the new captchas aren't too annoying, the first hour they were implemented faucet claims were cut down to 1/3 their prior amount which shows how severe the botting issue probably was.




Jump to: