Author

Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 1183. (Read 1989907 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Guys, when you do a billion rolls ... those 30 loss streaks eventually come out. (I've done a million rolls on another site last year.)

ok so is it pre determined or a combination of the three seeds hashed together? :\

It is pre-determined by all the seeds hashed together. Here's what you do, grab the server seed, your client seed, and compute your rolls with a nonce starting from 1, go up to 1 million. You'll know the result of your rolls. (But only after you have the server seed, which is after you randomize.)

Yeah.. because a million is the same as billion right? If you get 30 losses in a row, in under 1 million rolls, you would have to have a chimpanzee's brain not to be suspicious
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
BBmmBB, you can change the client seed at any moment, and then the site won't be able to control the bet results.


^so you vote to say it's not pre-determined!?  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
BBmmBB, you can change the client seed at any moment, and then the site won't be able to control the bet results.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Guys, when you do a billion rolls ... those 30 loss streaks eventually come out. (I've done a million rolls on another site last year.)

ok so is it pre determined or a combination of the three seeds hashed together? :\

It is pre-determined by all the seeds hashed together. ...

^it cannot be if changing the seed changes the outcome! ...what are you smoking?  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0

fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!!  Roll Eyes

So you had been winning big? So you must have had some pretty good winning streaks then huh? Do you think winning all of those times in a row on win streaks should be checked out or is rigged? It is variance man. In long sessions of bets you will usually have good winning streaks, losing streaks, and everything in between. Sounds like you should have cashed out when you were up winning big...  And did you verify your bets? What did you see when you checked them? Let me know.


it's cat and mouse ..when you have a way of consistently beating the system mods call it "hacking" lmfao ;-) *so they override all this to make sure you lose!!!
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
Guys, when you do a billion rolls ... those 30 loss streaks eventually come out. (I've done a million rolls on another site last year.)

ok so is it pre determined or a combination of the three seeds hashed together? :\

It is pre-determined by all the seeds hashed together. Here's what you do, grab the server seed, your client seed, and compute your rolls with a nonce starting from 1, go up to 1 million. You'll know the result of your rolls. (But only after you have the server seed, which is after you randomize.)
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!!  Roll Eyes

So you had been winning big? So you must have had some pretty good winning streaks then huh? Do you think winning all of those times in a row on win streaks should be checked out or is rigged? It is variance man. In long sessions of bets you will usually have good winning streaks, losing streaks, and everything in between. Sounds like you should have cashed out when you were up winning big...  And did you verify your bets? What did you see when you checked them? Let me know.

Sounds like another greedy kid crying once he loses xD
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
ok so is it pre determined or a combination of the three seeds hashed together? :\
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 530
$5 24k Gold FREE 4 sign-up! Mene.com/invite/h5ZRRP

fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!!  Roll Eyes

So you had been winning big? So you must have had some pretty good winning streaks then huh? Do you think winning all of those times in a row on win streaks should be checked out or is rigged? It is variance man. In long sessions of bets you will usually have good winning streaks, losing streaks, and everything in between. Sounds like you should have cashed out when you were up winning big...  And did you verify your bets? What did you see when you checked them? Let me know.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao


"Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao"

You've 'seen' a 30 red streak... not literally 1/2... this guy is on PD all the time and clearly a troll hired to run to their defense with these lame arguments.  If you had a 30 loss streak Brah and not suspicious at all and ooh it's just luck then you make me even more suspicious for spewing such garbage. A 30 loss streak is more than 1/billion so perhaps you should are a little naive my friend. If I had a 30 loss streak I would be dubious. Im sure most people would. But you seem happy to sit at home defending PD all day even though you had a 30 loss streak and in a rather negative balance. Just luck please come to these arguments with something more that rhetoric defense. We are men talking about money here brah, not some guy living at his moms house wagering faucet all day
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.



Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao



well it's very deceptive to say 49% or whatever when the game is suppose to be completely random and uncalibrated at best..more likely purposefully rigged whereas the operator controls the outcome! :\

Again please read provably fair. Also the coin toss comment


@xfactor lol Well you need to learn about probabilities and test out flipping a coin 10000.

The site is legit and I'm not here to defend PD blindly. It just idiots like you guys who know nothing and bitch about losing a few bets. I get you lost a lot with because you ended doubling but the only refunds that should be given are those in which the roll number got a loss when it was in fact a win, so unless it applies to your doubled bets I don't see you getting a full refund for gambling.

Get off your high horse buddy, men dont cry like you guys.


HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.



fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!!  Roll Eyes

Lol at least read up on how gambling sites work. Rolls are predetermined. Too many kids keep coming onto gambling sites thinknig they'll win 2x bets 50%+ of the time when they barely started playing a few rolls. the statistic is not out of 2 rols, 10 rolls, etc It out of 1k or 10k I forget.

You also have to stay on one side (over or under) and 2x all the way otherwise its different % of winning =3
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.



fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!!  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0


Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao



well it's very deceptive to say 49% or whatever when the game is suppose to be completely random and uncalibrated at best..more likely purposefully rigged whereas the operator controls the outcome! :\
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao


"Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao"

You've 'seen' a 30 red streak... not literally 1/2... this guy is on PD all the time and clearly a troll hired to run to their defense with these lame arguments.  If you had a 30 loss streak Brah and not suspicious at all and ooh it's just luck then you make me even more suspicious for spewing such garbage. A 30 loss streak is more than 1/billion so perhaps you should are a little naive my friend. If I had a 30 loss streak I would be dubious. Im sure most people would. But you seem happy to sit at home defending PD all day even though you had a 30 loss streak and in a rather negative balance. Just luck please come to these arguments with something more that rhetoric defense. We are men talking about money here brah, not some guy living at his moms house wagering faucet all day
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..


how much did you lose to the bug? :\
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao



HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.


you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

Roll Eyes 50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE
Jump to: