Author

Topic: Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot! - page 1642. (Read 1989496 times)

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
Man this site gets beaten! Almost 50 btc paid out today. Stunna I sincerely hope that's not out of your pocket again. Shocked

What we don't see is total deposits or total losses.  So long as people lost 50 BTC or more today then paying out 50 BTC isn't a problem.

Also, I can deposit 50 BTC and withdraw them straight away.  To you it looks like the site just took a beating whereas in fact I didn't place a single bet.

With sha512, how long many hashes per second would you need? If sha1 takes billions on billions on billions...

It doesn't matter which hash you use.  Brute forcing a 160 bit secret takes on average 2^159 attempts, and so to expect to be able to brute force it within 24 hours you need the same number of hashes per second.

The chosen hash makes that easier or harder to achieve by being faster or slower to run, but the hashrate you need to achieve is the same for all hashes.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Man this site gets beaten! Almost 50 btc paid out today. Stunna I sincerely hope that's not out of your pocket again. Shocked
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Well, I can now officially declare myself an idiot for gambling without paying attention. I deposited 0.05BTC, decided I'd gamble, I always do with 0.01, 50.50, what do I do? I insert 0.05 in the bet amount by accident and lose ._., and soon I'll bein the temptation to win it back again :<.

You should just let Stunna know, I'm sure he'd refund you some of it, maybe.

It could have been worse though haha Cheesy

Nah, it's not worth a refund, it was my own stupid sleepy mistake =P. It could have indeed been a lot worse, but it's still nasty. Oh well, I'll hopefully earn it back =P.
EDIT :  Plus, with the losses he has, he could use some of my losses =P

Yeh, I guess it still doesn't change the fact you still had a fair chance at winning.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Well, I can now officially declare myself an idiot for gambling without paying attention. I deposited 0.05BTC, decided I'd gamble, I always do with 0.01, 50.50, what do I do? I insert 0.05 in the bet amount by accident and lose ._., and soon I'll bein the temptation to win it back again :<.

You should just let Stunna know, I'm sure he'd refund you some of it, maybe.

It could have been worse though haha Cheesy

Nah, it's not worth a refund, it was my own stupid sleepy mistake =P. It could have indeed been a lot worse, but it's still nasty. Oh well, I'll hopefully earn it back =P.
EDIT :  Plus, with the losses he has, he could use some of my losses =P
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Well, I can now officially declare myself an idiot for gambling without paying attention. I deposited 0.05BTC, decided I'd gamble, I always do with 0.01, 50.50, what do I do? I insert 0.05 in the bet amount by accident and lose ._., and soon I'll bein the temptation to win it back again :<.

You should just let Stunna know, I'm sure he'd refund you some of it, maybe.

It could have been worse though haha Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Well, I can now officially declare myself an idiot for gambling without paying attention. I deposited 0.05BTC, decided I'd gamble, I always do with 0.01, 50.50, what do I do? I insert 0.05 in the bet amount by accident and lose ._., and soon I'll bein the temptation to win it back again :<.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Who here's clash lol. Taking over Vink's reign as #1 haxer

hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Lol. It's never enough  Cheesy

"No matter how many coins you have, you'll never be rich"

Cheesy
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
101 Bitcoins profit still http://primedice.com/bets.php?user=fun&limit=200

You should just call it quits foreverrrrrrrrrrrrr, 100 Bitcoins is more than enough haha



Ow
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
I lost for the first time Sad

Did someone hack Vink's account? This isn't possible.
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
Small update. You can now view other users statistics & watch their balance update in real time. Just click on a users name in any of the tables and click show previous bets. If you wish to have your statistics hidden from the public, please PM me and it will be done!


Affiliate program will also be rolled out very soon with a very high return!

-Stunna
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
What if someone had a botnet of say 500,000 pc's. Bitcoin is notorious for DDOS attacks, which origin from large botnets, and some of the botnets have 300-500,000 pcs or more. So what if someone pointed that artillery towards the sha?

If you had a million PCs (each with a similar GPU to the one you were using on your single PC) then you could divide your hashes per second per PC by a million.  Then, instead of 9 million billion billion billion billion hashes per second per PC, you'd "only" need to do 9 billion billion billion billion hashes per second per PC to find the secret in 23 hours.  And those hashes are now sha512 hashes, not sha1 hashes.  I expect they take longer, but I don't know.

Would it then be solvable in minutes/hours? Just asking a theoretical question.

Theoretical answer: "no".  Smiley

With sha512, how long many hashes per second would you need? If sha1 takes billions on billions on billions...
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
What if someone had a botnet of say 500,000 pc's. Bitcoin is notorious for DDOS attacks, which origin from large botnets, and some of the botnets have 300-500,000 pcs or more. So what if someone pointed that artillery towards the sha?

If you had a million PCs (each with a similar GPU to the one you were using on your single PC) then you could divide your hashes per second per PC by a million.  Then, instead of 9 million billion billion billion billion hashes per second per PC, you'd "only" need to do 9 billion billion billion billion hashes per second per PC to find the secret in 23 hours.  And those hashes are now sha512 hashes, not sha1 hashes.  I expect they take longer, but I don't know.

Would it then be solvable in minutes/hours? Just asking a theoretical question.

Theoretical answer: "no".  Smiley
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Why does that even matter? SHA1 should not be used for anything today.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
What if someone had a botnet of say 500,000 pc's. Bitcoin is notorious for DDOS attacks, which origin from large botnets, and some of the botnets have 300-500,000 pcs or more. So what if someone pointed that artillery towards the sha?

Would it then be solvable in minutes/hours? Just asking a theoretical question.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Hmm.. Talk about predicting the future. Guy bets constant 0.001 on a 6x multiplier. Loses them all. Suddenly 89x's his bet, ups the multipier to 9x and then wins.


hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Hey,

We highly doubt anyone was cheating, we made the switch to Sha512 as it was very simple to implement and more practical in the long run.


Also we've restored the maximum bet payout to 5BTC Smiley

-Stunna

Good to hear, did you make Bitcoins back in order to put it back at 5? Or just buy?

I rly hope made lol
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
Hey,

We highly doubt anyone was cheating, we made the switch to Sha512 as it was very simple to implement and more practical in the long run.


Also we've restored the maximum bet payout to 5BTC Smiley

-Stunna
Jump to: