Prize hunters have worked for the promotion of the project, and have not received payment for hard work, a lot has happened, because the project failed, finally the hunters did not receive payment, I hope in 2020 it will not happen again, because they will really need the prize hunters to promote their project..
For projects that are not well-known it will really need the prize hunters to make project promotions, but for projects that are already famous will not need prize hunters, because they can succeed without making bounties, and in the past there were also many successful projects just by making ICOs only, and don't make a bounty. 
Topic: Projects that failed to keep their promise in 2019 - page 6. (Read 1814 times)
The scary things happen in the bear market and the broken promises by teams are the first example. The useless projects introduce their shitcoin to the investors and investors don't fall to their lying machine. The small exchanges are nor promised on the first date of IEO but they first prefer to list coin there.
about 80-90% of those projects actually failed their promises. most of them are just good in creating their roadmap but when you talk about the real achievements, very few can directly answer that part.
maybe we need to list the projects that kept their promises, maybe that would be easier task because they are only few of them. the rest are failed ones.
Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists
1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.
Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?
We can change this matter because investor or Dev they believe only bounty hunters can dump the price. I see so many hunters, they didn't move any coin in 1-2 years. Same I found in Coinhe campaign, token still in wallet. Even bounty hunter reward isn't more than one day volume. I saw a token that dumped huge and lowest selling amount is more than bounty allocation. 1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.
Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?
The scary things happen in the bear market and the broken promises by teams are the first example. The useless projects introduce their shitcoin to the investors and investors don't fall to their lying machine. The small exchanges are nor promised on the first date of IEO but they first prefer to list coin there.
Maybe the best idea here is to create a new topic for each of this projects, named "*Project Name* - is a scam! *some proofs presented...*". If this topic is active enough, project's team will have to do something.
This is already happening, in the scam accusation and reputation sections of the forum you can find many threads about people accusing projects of being scams and most of the project leaders never take the time to answer to those accusations because they know they are true and they also know that most people are never going to make any effort to research their project which could help them to find such thread, so they do not really care about those accusations.
Prize hunters have worked for the promotion of the project, and have not received payment for hard work, a lot has happened, because the project failed, finally the hunters did not receive payment, I hope in 2020 it will not happen again, because they will really need the prize hunters to promote their project..
There are still some projects other than the ones you mentioned that do not want to pay participants after their project success, I do not know why they do so to the participants, but this does not comply with the agreements that they wrote on a bounty board before the project begins. I have also experienced this, but I can not do much.
The issue of projects not keeping to their promises is very popular in this industry. Even the airdroppers and bounty hunters are aware that anything could happen to their reward. Projects are quick to accuse bounty hunters for dumping the price of the tokens and this has always resulted in the project shifting the goal posts.
Bounty hunters are actually not worthy of being accused of wasting tokens, because hunters only get reward on a small scale, so the potential for throwing away tokens will not have much effect on the exchange. Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists
1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.
Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?
If I'm not mistaken, then Nestree and Sero paid what they promised.Most likely You have not fulfilled some conditions....There are a lot of projects that have not fulfilled their promises.But it is necessary not to dwell on them and continue to participate in the bounty.Yet successful projects also exist. 1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.
Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?
The issue of projects not keeping to their promises is very popular in this industry. Even the airdroppers and bounty hunters are aware that anything could happen to their reward. Projects are quick to accuse bounty hunters for dumping the price of the tokens and this has always resulted in the project shifting the goal posts.
The very reason why investors and most bounty hunters are no longer interested taking the big risk of participating and supporting the project. There's no safe haven with investing to new projects, most of this are created by the developers who are only aiming for quick benefits and always ready to runaway or to blame someone from their own mistakes. Failed project also bringing negative impressions to the entire ecosystem,
The list of projects that failed to keep their promise are inexhaustible. I remember participating in a bounty where the tokens promised were not distributed. I actually had a negative feeling about that bounty because of the crazy updates that were made along the line. Its quite painful because the tokens are trading and I really needed that money for my personal supplies.
The issue of projects not keeping to their promises is very popular in this industry. Even the airdroppers and bounty hunters are aware that anything could happen to their reward. Projects are quick to accuse bounty hunters for dumping the price of the tokens and this has always resulted in the project shifting the goal posts.
This issue has been discussed many times in the past. I don't understand why everyone is quick to blame the bounty hunter, when the bounty pool is just 1% or 2% of the total allocation. Can the price of a token manipulated with just 1% of the total supply? If that is the case, then it proves that the project has no liquidity. If the promoters are so sure about the viability of the project, then why can't they buy back this 1% at half the listing price and then sell these tokens later at a profit?
If there have good promising developing then it will be good for everyone bounty hunter with investors.
In fact, the situation of ICOs has been so bad over the past few years that we have just forgotten it. Then investors are accepting the IEO more, but of course it is being applied more to the popular top exchange. So I think if a project gives more importance to their development, then that project will definitely be a success.
In fact, the situation of ICOs has been so bad over the past few years that we have just forgotten it. Then investors are accepting the IEO more, but of course it is being applied more to the popular top exchange. So I think if a project gives more importance to their development, then that project will definitely be a success.
The issue of projects not keeping to their promises is very popular in this industry. Even the airdroppers and bounty hunters are aware that anything could happen to their reward. Projects are quick to accuse bounty hunters for dumping the price of the tokens and this has always resulted in the project shifting the goal posts.
This is one of the main issues bounty hunters face when participating in campaigns that don't have the funds escrowed in advance or that aren't run by a reputable campaign manager, so make sure you DYOR into each campaign to avoid wasting time and effort on offerings that might be potential scams
Not trust bounty campaign manager make us waste time for joining bounty campaign and not received reward any more, although project failed when bounty campaign manager trusted they will announce with their campaign failed during ICO is not success, but whit bounty campaign success on ICO always delay distributed coin for bounty participants.Hmm.. this was one of the reasons why I stopped doing bounty campaigns and then switched to a campaign that paid me in BTC rather than in tokens. Very few of the ICOs are successful nowadays and even if some ICO is listed in an exchange they delay the distribution of bounty. The excuse being given is that if they distribute the bounty quickly, then the hunters will dump all their tokens and crash the prices. But the real reason is to give enough time for the promoters to dump their tokens in the exchanges. The bounty hunters will get their tokens, only after the dumping by the promoters is complete.
They keep promising because it is part of their marketing plan and also their promotion to keep the sales moving up. I do not believe to their fishy promises because I will only lose my money their. Many investors are losing money in making investment with ICOs and IEOs and it is because they are believing to their shit promises where it is not really realistic. If an ICO or IEO make an promise, you should now double think because there is high possibility that their promise will fail.
This is one of the main issues bounty hunters face when participating in campaigns that don't have the funds escrowed in advance or that aren't run by a reputable campaign manager, so make sure you DYOR into each campaign to avoid wasting time and effort on offerings that might be potential scams
Not trust bounty campaign manager make us waste time for joining bounty campaign and not received reward any more, although project failed when bounty campaign manager trusted they will announce with their campaign failed during ICO is not success, but whit bounty campaign success on ICO always delay distributed coin for bounty participants. 
This is one of the main issues bounty hunters face when participating in campaigns that don't have the funds escrowed in advance or that aren't run by a reputable campaign manager, so make sure you DYOR into each campaign to avoid wasting time and effort on offerings that might be potential scams
one thing you need to do with a project like that, forget it. if they really want to develop the project with their dishonesty, in some time the project will be abandoned by investors, and the worst is bankruptcy. the first thing that needs to be built is trust, and this year there are quite a lot of projects that don't have that, even I don't want to list it because it's quite a lot
It is too bad that some bounties taking advantage on us, its been years since there are always a bounties that will give promise to all its participants and will give them bonuses, we will help them, shared their post, contents and everything and still they are the one who scammed us.
I have seen a lot of projects like this wherein they belittle the bounty hunters saying that they or we will just dump their tokens maybe some or mostly will sell right away but then again they did the campaign so we have the right to do whatever we wanted to about it. Hence, it is ours.
Jump to: