How did I know you were going to ignore my previous post?
Random question...
Were you home schooled, or did you go to a private Christian/Catholic school?
Why do you keep focusing on the two of us, rather than continuing to say that you have debunked the proof that God exists found in combining the 3 scientific laws, when you really haven't debunked anything?:
1. Cause and effect;
2. Complex universe;
3. Universal complexity.
I feel like it's already the 4th time I ask this but...
Why do you believe those 3 laws are proven? Where is your proof of those 3 laws?
They are proven in the fact that they are in evidence everywhere, without any known contradictions to them. That's why you find men of science calling them laws rather than theories or hypotheses.
Wrong. You know you denied quantum physics as a law? Well if quantum physics is not a law, then the cause and effect isn't true as simple as that. We discovered phenomenon where consequence happens before the cause. Unless quantum physics is true. Your choice buddy, but both can't be true.
I did not deny QP as law. After all, it exists, doesn't it?
All I am saying about QP is, any results that it provides are completely guesswork as to whether or not the results are law... until the results are proven through some scientific method other than QP.
What kind of law is that?