...
The greater complexity has more order within it.
...
Chaos can be quite complex.
Chaos Theory can be complex.
There is no real chaos. Everything acts according to the laws of nature as cause and effect dictate. Chaos, like randomness, exist only in the minds of people who can't see (understand) the reason why.
So now you are going to dismiss reality because it is conflicting with your ancient world view.
Cause and effect shows that there is no real chaos. Chaos theory is not necessarily about chaos.
Chaos theory is theory; it has not been proven to be true. Cause and effect is truth. In fact, cause and effect are the basis for scientific examination and discovery.
Why are trying to turn reality into fiction and fiction into reality?
Could you just do ONE thing so we can settle this whole discussion?
Define how YOU decide a theory is true. Then we'll be able to discuss. Cause all you're saying is "the laws that makes my point are true, the others are just theories".
I don't and can't decide a theory is true. If the proposal in the theory is true, the so-called theory is not a theory. Rather, it is a law.
This doesn't mean that people know that it is a law. Scientists may not have figured out that it is a law. Maybe it is complex enough that they will never figure out that it is a law. If this is the case, it will always remain a theory in their understanding.
This doesn't meant that it is a theory in reality. It may be a law in reality. But because scientists haven't determined that it is a law, they will always have to consider it a theory... at least until they can prove that it is a law.
If you mean, how do I decide if a theory is a theory, well, I'm not into formulating theories. I simply take their word for it when they say it is a theory.
In addition, I am not simply saying something like "the laws that makes my point are real laws." What I am doing is stating the laws so that anybody that wants to see that they are laws can, once he has confirmed that they are laws, start calculating for himself that they prove the existence of God.
If you are really that interested, you need to do a little research... but not all that much.
Which is why we all ask you this question: how do you make the difference between a true proposal and a false one?
Because for scientists, the proposals of the laws you say are true are less proven than the ones you say are wrong!
My question is about this sentence: " If the proposal in the theory is true, the so-called theory is not a theory. Rather, it is a law. " how do you determine the proposal is true?
