Topic: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no - page 13. (Read 43401 times)

What's up with you and Lauda, did she delete so many of your posts?

Get used to getting your posts deleted as a newbie, I had more than 20 posts deleted when I was a newbie.

By the way it wasn't Lauda who did it.

Let's speak of unethical, immoral and wrong.

You stole money from another community member pretending to be a neutral third party.
You lied about being banned.
You lied about leaving the community.
You post to yourself using alt accounts to boost your point of view.

I have no idea why community members still support you, or why the moneypot.com campaign supports you, but what you are is a HYPOCRITE.

You have no right to judge others based on morality or ethics.

I believe what Lauda did was unethical, immortal, and wrong. I also don't think it is right that Lauda is trying to sweep what he did under the rug as if nothing ever happened. Lauda clearly knew the value of the coin was more then what he was offering it because he said that other sellers would ask a higher price then the $25 he was offering. The appropriate resolution to unsuccessfully extorting someone is not to exchange positive trust with the person you tried to extort

1 - you are wrong about entering into a contract
2 - Ignoring 1, you were still made whole when you received a refund. The feedback that you left is clearly retaliatory in nature, and it looks like you are basing the trust that you leave based on the fact that someone is or is not willing to do business with you.

I think it was me, actually. 

In any case, people should know that gorgon666 (the OP) is an alt of Quickseller.  defcon23 is not.

bullshit accusation.

I report posts because I think they violate the forum rules for reasons I state in the comments to my reports.

You were unabled to host your auction in the way you stated in OP, I prevented you from continuing to run an auction which should have ended by the rules several bids before.
An action you thanked me for back then, as I prevented a possibly big mess, but which you now use to turn against me, like you regularly are turning on people with other stuff.

Your raffle is another example of you fucking up. You had accepted my entry, we came to what I considered a vocal contract.
For me, the bet was placed and accepted, it was written in stone with this.
You then chose to revoke everything we had agreed on over me reporting one of your posts and it getting deleted as a result.
You also made up other rules on the way and changed things, which you shouldn't have made.
I consider this no acceptable way to host a raffle and I think you should stop doing those, if you fail like this in them.

Not sure what the frenchman is trying to say me here, maybe grab a dictionary and try again?

Yeah, I'm literally the GESTAPO.

yeah sure ... and  it was not a long time  before you promised to stop your shit ... just before you asked to Lutpin to do all he can do against me ( multiples reports for no valid reasons ) at least  5 since 15 jully .. is this wasnt agressive ... i dont understand at all ..   trolling my threads ( that's start with the auction for the coin for wich you have tried to blackmail me ... and continued since this date ... ( look at his posts in my last raffle...)  in other way it should be genetic for Lutpin ... that's remember olds storys in sads parts of French history  when people used to reports people ....


by the way another one  where you propose to "arrange" my posts, and propose kindly to rewrite them to your advantage  :



i really love the end : "plop twist of the year" ...  


well... i let you play with this thread , continued to try convaince people with your arguments ...  lol

He tried his best I assume and so did I.

Yawn. Even if you managed to acquire any valid information it would be useless.

I guess genuinely trying to be helpful is not enough these days.

---

It seems that the user randomly turns on their own words; here's a shot from the begging of our 'peaceful negotiations':


 

Lauda is honestly great, one of the best mods (and generally users) visiting this board. I really don't understand, why somebody is to dumb to create thread like this one.

who try to manipulate bitcointalk trust ranking ? me ?? look by yourself:




you can clearly see here who is trying to manipulate everyone , just to save his ass in this thread...

Then NO : Lauda shoudnt be a moderator .. if we cant trust a moderator that's start to be terrible for everyone....

really ? : so you should explain that to the troll ( Vod) too ..

despite the fact that the evidence that i escrowed for myself doesn't even make any sense, Lauda has said multiple times that Vods rating is valid and it is because of Lauda that cryptodevil left me  a negative rating.

Just because Lauda left me a "positive rating" for a trade we have ( and just after left a bad one ) doesn't mean that he isn't working against me behind the scenes.

Lauda should be removed as a moderator and i do not believe Lauda is able to be impartial. that's a fact.
A moderator never tried to force an user to sold him a coin under his real  valor , with menacing of detroy his reputation if  i dont do it ..
by the way , he finaly did it : look at all this shit now ..  i just applause : well done !

Please keep the tidbits of information coming! Every little bit about the identity of Lauda helps!

Why do you keep fanning the fire that had already been put out with Canary's help? Defcon23 clearly has issues, just leave it be and move along.

It is neutral and will remain like that.

I have ignored him as I'm done with this. I have put too much effort into genuinely trying to make peace with this user just to have them to back out of everything in an instant.

I am starting to think that a) You are doing this on purpose; b) You have comprehension issues. The coin was not worth "0.25 BTC" unless you can see in the future(?). Even now, it is arguable if it is worth 0.25 BTC. Similarly if I offer someone ~$670 for 1 BTC now, you can't claim I offered "next to nothing" if it reaches a price of, e.g. $1k after X time.

I even explained to him several times, during our negations, why bad retaliatory feedback should not be left.

Lutpin - I see you left him needed feedback, and he turned around and left you negative instantly.  Be prepared for the PMs offering to remove that feedback if you remove yours.  



Sure he has.  It has value to him to not have negative feedback on his profile.  I understand the rules are different in your world, however.

I don't think you understand what it means to blackmail someone. In order to blackmail someone, you need to ask for something of value that is not rightfully yours. Defcon23 has not asked for anything of value from Lauda.

Lauda on the otherhand asked for a cryptocoin worth 0.25BTC for next to nothing, and threatened to damage his reputation if he did not comply. There is a very big difference between the two. 

And like clockwork, he changed his feedback back to negative, in an attempt to blackmail you.

Be the bigger person, keep your feedback at neutral, and let the entire community see what a nutjob that guy is.

(You may also want to block his PMs like I had to, or else you will get constant PMS offering to remove his negative feedback IF you leave him positive.)

@CanaryInTheMine - Kudos to you on your attempt to bring peace.  I believe defcon is too mentally unstable to understand what you were trying to do.   

Shipping from sky to me was something around $3, shipping from me to Mitchell was around $6-ish, I think shipping from Mitchell to Lauda will happen in bulk, so there's probably no additional shipping cost for that.
It indeed did take alot of time, mostly due to customs sitting on the package for around a week,
but the price is rather low, considering that shipping from the US to Europe often comes at $25/$50+ without any additional steps for reshipping.

---

I've got cats, you like cats - we're basically BFFs.

Honestly, from the conversation that I had with them I got the idea that they genuenly wanted to make peace and get this over with. Additionally, they were really friendly yesterday. I guess I was wrong, the feedback has been reduced to neutral in light of the new situation and is going to stay that way.

So people who are genuinely concerned with privacy and anonymity are strange? There was only 1 person here besides Mitchell that ever shipped to me directly, but they are deceased.

You could either get IRC/Slack/PM logs to back these up or TX ID's (in some cases there are none since there's a trade-in). However, I'm sure that most of these people don't want to get involved.

No. I had suggested and even labeled it (optional) to him while we were discussing. I asked several times whether the other party felt like something had to be done differently, they insisted several times that they just wanted to make peace and we came to a mutual agreement. The user in question suddenly backed out of everything for something that has no connection to me(?) and thus I've changed my rating to neutral. I'm really done with this. I will neither remove nor change my rating anymore.

If occasionally talking, mostly about forum related matters, equals being somewhat close and 'backing him', maybe.

I have never stated I'd leave the seller negative rating for that and have not done so.

No. I was aware of the auction that day, however the rating has nothing to do with the bogus escrow situation but their bad retaliatory feedback (which they have rewritten properly with my help) and thus I have removed my rating. Also: Defcon23 refused to sell at all (mentioned even possibly keeping it, not refused to sell just at $25.

Again, defcon23 insisted on keeping it short.

There were no sales of a #1 in the open market (I had 3 private sales so far) beforehand and the offer was genuine. The user in question didn't provide a counter-offer (e.g. higher asking price) and thus it was left at that.

The situation was specific. For some reason chronicsky was unable to ship directly to NL.

I guess I will have to take your word for it. Although that does sound like an awful lot of steps for a couple of $25 coins.

txids for trades of genesis coins against each other for completing sets or aquiring certain #'s aswell as metals are rather hard to get, there aren't any.
I've been reshipping a coin from chronicsky to Mitchell, which was intended to end up at Laudas, I'm sure both of the involved parties (besides Lauda and me) will confirm this, when you ask them.