Topic: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no - page 14. (Read 43417 times)

I am not sure that doxing someone over this incident is appropriate. I would suggest that a more appropriate resolution would be a warning not to deal with Lauda, and removing her from being a mod. My opinion on this would obviously change in the event that additional evidence is uncovered that suggests this is more then an isolated incident.

I do find it strange that someone who has been as uncontroversial as Lauda in the past is going to such great lengths to protect their identity, especially considering the reputation of those Lauda has traded physical items with. Or maybe it is strange that Lutpin is claiming this to be a fact (when it is really not) -- if this is the case then Lutpin is clearly not the neutral party he is claiming to be in this thread -- are there any txid's that might backup these trades?

I think this looks very bad on the side of Lauda. For starters, it appears this is more evidence that Lauda is engaging in trust farming. Secondly, and more importantly, it discredits the claim that Lauda was "joking" when he threatened to leave negative trust when the coin in question was put up for sale.

#1 from what I can gather, it looks like the posts in question probably should have been deleted.
#2 From what I can gather, you are somewhat close to Lauda, and appear to be backing him. From an outsider's perspective, one might be able to argue that the reason for the reports might be something more then you "came across" an old post that should be deleted.
#3 In the past, others have suddenly had a lot of old bumps deleted when they were in the middle of a dispute with someone. They sometimes receive this as being an intimidation tactic.
#4 with #2 being said, the fact that I do not like someone, or that I am on one side of an argument/dispute with someone will not prevent me from reporting their posts
#5 Considering #1, someone else would likely have eventually reported the posts anyway.

Lauda offered to buy a coin from defcon23 for $25. After defcon23 declined the offer, Lauda said she was going to leave negative trust (see screenshot here). Lauda claims that her threat of negative trust was a "joke". A few weeks later, defcon auctions off the coin in question, and Lauda leaves defcon23 negative trust on the day the auction was scheduled to end. (it might have been said that Lauda was not aware of the auction at the time the negative trust was left, but I am not 100% sure). The negative trust was over something that allegedly happened ~a year ago. The coin ended up selling for ~7 times the amount of Lauda's offer.

The coin that Lauda was trying to buy still ended up selling for ~7x what Lauda was trying to pay for it.

You left out the reason why there is a dispute in the first place.

Yes, you said that you expected to be asked to pay a price that was higher then the $25 you were offering. You knew that you would not be able to buy the coin for $25 in the open market.

defcon23 is the blackmailer in this matter, and he has a history of blackmail.

blackmail:  to force or coerce into a particular action, statement, etc.

I left defcon23 proper negative feedback after he was caught in a escrow scam.

He then left me negative feedback calling me a scammer.

He then sent me many PMs saying he would remove his feedback if I removed mine.  I finally had to block his PMs.

Now he did the same thing to Lauda, removing his lying feedback only once Lauda removed his feedback.

I have no idea why Lauda would leave that blackmailer POSITIVE feedback while he continues to insult Lauda.  

No. I wanted a more detailed timeline but defcon23 said it should be kept short and that other people could ask us directly what happened if they wanted to know. I'm not completely sure what you mean with the second part, but I did mention expecting to be asked ridiculous prices for the last piece(s).

I'm collecting Genesis series 2. These are series 1 coins and you use that for a price comparison(look at the thread update date)?

---

I highly advise you to stop pretending like you know what you're talking about (in this matter) when your knowledge regarding crypto-coins is questionable at best.

I interfered with your auction because you failed to follow the rules you layed down within OP, which others confirmed.
I had no idea MJ was bidding for lauda at that time (I suspected it, strongly, but did NOT know it).
Accusing me of all this shit is shocking to me, integrity has always been a key to me.

---

@QS: that sale by cjb is a series 1 coin, which imo can't be compared. I sold a #2 series 2 coin for much less roughly at the auction time.

You forgot to mention the fact that you threatened ("jokingly" or not) defcon23 with negative trust if he did not sell the coin to you.

You also failed to mention that you told defcon23 that you expected to be asked to pay a higher price for a similar coin "later"

You failed to mention that a less desirable coin (serial number 2 as opposed to 1) was selling for much more then your offer price here

IIRC minerjones told me about it, I was not aware that the auction was in progress. In any case, he did it to prevent it from getting 'lost' (another one already is).

I was away during the auction ending (I think), and have only seen what happened after it happened. You can't blame Lutpin for pointing out incorrect bids (according to your own auction rules), can you? Not that this is relevant to the OP.

You forgot to add the part where you both were working for me.

This is the first I've heard of it and I'm not even sure what went on but I have no interest in getting in any drama between you and Lauda and that's something you two will have to work out. I merely just stopped by to tell you that I deleted those posts that were constituted as bumps and there's no vast conspiracy going on against you.

you have ask to minerjones to bid for you, and syncerly never mind with this ...    but, even in this auction , your friend Lutpin have acted ... read it  ( just because the price was goes too higuest for "you" ) ( 0.3 btc )


and about this post:


it is not less or more "inconsitent post than the ones you have reported from mine)

Damnit, this was meant to be a secret!

Breaking news: mini and I are partners in crime.

---

Just for the record: YOU'RE Bonny, and I'm Clyde. No-one should think it's the other way around.

I can't have anything to do with this even if I wanted it (someone else would have to confirm a rule was broken in order to delete them).


Again, I apologize for the unintended mess from a chatroom. I'm at most semi-serious there unless there's a deep conversation going on. I have bought the coin via the auction and would have most likely offered you a lot more back when I offered $25 (but you refused to sell).

Again, it was because of the bad feedback that you left on others. You've fixed it and thus I removed my rating. We've been over this several times now?

Ok .. please explain me why should i sold a coin to Lauda for 25$ ( wich i can sold for 0.25 btc ) , and if i dont do it , have my rating painted in red ? is this normal ?

i have never scam anyone and always been honest with everyone .

I handled several if not all the reports. As already stated, Lutpin reported them and they were handled just like any other report would be. Lauda had nothing to do with it and bumps getting deleted aren't going to get you banned. Stop being paranoid.

NO i will send directly to Theymos . i need to understand and to explain .

Then send them to a global moderator, such as Cyrus or Hilariousandco, and ask why they were removed. Either that, or post the screenshots here and I'm sure someone will tell you what you did wrong.

Because your post was breaking a rule, and Lutpin doesn't want posts that break the rules to be on the forum, so he reports them? Lutpin has reported over 6,000 posts, and I'm sure they're not all yours. I've had posts which are months old deleted, a few days is nothing.



Who are you and what have you done with BadBear?

---

Oh, I reported this one. I reported it because you did nothing to change the previous, quoted post but make some text red and blue, making it a useless post. You could have done the same thing with an edit.