Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
Does it matter?
Yes.
Topic: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no - page 4. (Read 43417 times)
December 19, 2016, 06:32:00 PM
Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
Does it matter?
Yes.
December 19, 2016, 06:19:57 PM
His analysis is useless and inaccurate. He is trying to distract from the fact that Lauda is an unqualified, inept (and more) moderator that does not have any business being anywhere near authority.
Pretty sure you're trying to distract from the fact that you're using so many alts in these threads ...
Good luck!
Here's the thing, once you get caught doing this, no one is going to take any threads where QS argues seriously because we all know that most of the opinions in that thread are just you posting under alts. Maybe go back to that thing where you said you were going to take a long break and stop harrassing us on this forum?
December 19, 2016, 04:10:33 PM
This thread seems to be more about Lauda and less about forum moderator requirements. Perhaps it's time that it be moved to the reputation section?
December 19, 2016, 01:50:54 PM
I thought cum lauda was the feminine of cum laude. 
December 19, 2016, 11:49:16 AM
Some of you forum guys need to pull the sticks from your rear and figure out where a joke is at play. Wow
December 19, 2016, 04:34:22 AM
Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
Does it matter?
December 18, 2016, 09:17:12 PM
Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
nopeI reads it on the internets, so it must be true, your silly logic won't change that fact!
December 18, 2016, 06:31:37 PM
Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
nope December 18, 2016, 11:47:54 AM
Is this thread still a thing?
Everyone has issues with mods.
I've moderated and been head admin of a few large forums and facebook groups (nowhere near this size..)
And regardless of what you do, people hate you.
Move on with life and try to stay out of their radar.
Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
Everyone has issues with mods.
I've moderated and been head admin of a few large forums and facebook groups (nowhere near this size..)
And regardless of what you do, people hate you.
Move on with life and try to stay out of their radar.
Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
December 17, 2016, 01:23:37 AM
^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position, either. Just sayin'.
Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position? Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.
Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.
Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.
Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!). Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts? I dunno.
I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore. Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?
You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.
His analysis is useless and inaccurate. He is trying to distract from the fact that Lauda is an unqualified, inept (and more) moderator that does not have any business being anywhere near authority.
December 14, 2016, 10:39:52 PM
I'm surprised Quickseller hasn't locked this thread yet.
~BCX~
~BCX~
December 14, 2016, 09:52:39 PM
After all this time... glad to see this topic is still on the first page in meta...
December 14, 2016, 09:48:21 PM
Quote from: BadBear on September 22, 2015, 11:39:48 AM
Quote from: minifrij on September 22, 2015, 11:39:22 AM
If you do not have a good enough feedback score yourself, you cannot affect others scores. This is why your feedback goes into the 'Untrusted Feedback' section, rather than the Trusted.
If you get tagged by someone on Default trust in a positive way, I believe that you can then influence trust scores yourself.
You're wrong, stop confusing people. If you get tagged by someone on Default trust in a positive way, I believe that you can then influence trust scores yourself.
Oh come on, you can do better, that's a very shitty straw man.
I'll take the word of someone who can do this...
... over a shilly puppet any day.
December 14, 2016, 09:30:52 PM
By participating in the discussion, she is unduly influencing a decision that will affect her directly.
I fail to see the logic behind this. For starters, as proven by DeepSpace/Mitchell's statement, the topic would have been treated the same had Lauda not dealt with it. Secondly, I don't see how moving a topic will affect them at all. The topic was not removed from being seen, nor censored in any way. The difference being that it is categorized correctly, if anything making it easier for anyone interested to find the thread.BTW the thread was complaining about the behavior of a staff member, and asking for that staff member to be removed from being staff, that sounds more like a thread for meta don't you think?
The thread was complaining about receiving negative trust from Lauda, for this reason it belongs in Reputation. This is the case regardless of who received or left the feedback. If the thread were about a problem with the trust system it's self, not a specific person on it, or complaining about Lauda's moderation (as this thread is, I suppose) then it would be more fitting in Meta.Quote from: BadBear on September 22, 2015, 11:39:48 AM
Quote from: minifrij on September 22, 2015, 11:39:22 AM
If you do not have a good enough feedback score yourself, you cannot affect others scores. This is why your feedback goes into the 'Untrusted Feedback' section, rather than the Trusted.
If you get tagged by someone on Default trust in a positive way, I believe that you can then influence trust scores yourself.
You're wrong, stop confusing people. If you get tagged by someone on Default trust in a positive way, I believe that you can then influence trust scores yourself.
December 14, 2016, 09:07:27 PM
Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.
My golly, does the ludite truly believe that a wundahbox can unearth a nom de guerre using this schema? This is truly the confab of a celibate in need of some peepee friction fun.
Now excuse me while I go to my motorized rollingham, for I will need to blast some fizzlebombs in revelry of the up coming nativity.
December 14, 2016, 03:15:45 PM
Is it just my imagination or does gorgon666 appear to also be Quickseller?
~BCX~
It's not just your imagination. gorgon666 was outed as yet another QS alt some months ago.
December 13, 2016, 09:26:54 PM
Is it just my imagination or does gorgon666 appear to also be Quickseller?
~BCX~
December 12, 2016, 12:03:38 PM
^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position, either. Just sayin'.
Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position? Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.
Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.
Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.
Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!). Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts? I dunno.
I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore. Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?
You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.
Zzzactly!
December 10, 2016, 05:19:37 PM
By participating in the discussion, she is unduly influencing a decision that will affect her directly.
I fail to see the logic behind this. For starters, as proven by DeepSpace/Mitchell's statement, the topic would have been treated the same had Lauda not dealt with it. Secondly, I don't see how moving a topic will affect them at all. The topic was not removed from being seen, nor censored in any way. The difference being that it is categorized correctly, if anything making it easier for anyone interested to find the thread.BTW the thread was complaining about the behavior of a staff member, and asking for that staff member to be removed from being staff, that sounds more like a thread for meta don't you think?
The thread was complaining about receiving negative trust from Lauda, for this reason it belongs in Reputation. This is the case regardless of who received or left the feedback. If the thread were about a problem with the trust system it's self, not a specific person on it, or complaining about Lauda's moderation (as this thread is, I suppose) then it would be more fitting in Meta. December 10, 2016, 03:42:06 PM
^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position, either. Just sayin'.
Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position? Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.
Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.
Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.
Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!). Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts? I dunno.
I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore. Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?
You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.
Jump to: