Topic: Question about Bounty managers (Read 698 times)
Knowing that the bounty manager already have the token in his/her possession makes the bounty more secure and guarantee to some extent, however, so far in all bounties i have participated in, the team always pay the reward to hunters eventually, only on few occasions that team will refuse to pay the reward, if you have trusted team, you don't worry about getting paid because the team will ensure it is done.
I prefer the first with a little adjustment, probably combining the 2 process. The spreadsheet should be submitted, vetted by the team before sending the token to the bounty managers for distribution. There are cases bounty managers have a lot of spam accounts that they reward, in the process diverting the money to themselves and reducing hunters reward. The vetting process can correct such cases
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
What is the difference who will distribute tokens? I personally do not care, the main thing that I got them.1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
What is the difference who will distribute tokens? I personally do not care, the main thing that I got them. 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
What I feel is that only a serious and reputable team will send their tokens to a bounty manager for distribution to be done by him, which in another sense, the manager might be corrupt.
If I am into a bounty campaign where I do not trust the manager or that the manager is still new to me, I will prefer that the token is distributed by the team.
If I am into a bounty campaign where I do not trust the manager or that the manager is still new to me, I will prefer that the token is distributed by the team.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I trust bounty manager than the developers, bounty managers wants to satisfy bounty hunters because the success of the bounty depends so much on bounty hunters, and besides developers are the ones delaying bounty distribution, and even locking it just like the case of Dexage, and Liker.
Neither option is good. Because it involves the distribution of interests. The problem is too complicated. The Bounty manager has his concerns. Teams have their own problems to consider. The key is whether the Bounty Hunter receives the bounty.
The first option in my opinion is the best. If the manager is trust worthy and he is known for good conduct and discipline here on bitcointalk, why not? He should be in charge
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
For me it doesn't matter who holds the bounty tokens as long as they are honest and will not take advantage of the participants. Nowadays, majority of bounties are scam. For the sake of the argument, if I have to choose, I prefer the first option wherein the bounty manager holds the tokens and then distribute it after the campaign. That will minimize the delay of distribution because the one whose checking the work is also the distributor.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I think the team should keep our token. because bounty managers are not good. Sometimes they keep the project token, they will run away and no one will be able to find them.1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
and project owners will not let this happen. After completing the campaign, they will get bonuses and bounty hunters will be paid later.
Now everyone will use to produce in a way
1) if the regulation is more sophisticated, it will be invested in several fields
2) the manager also always wants to release all his accounts to someone who can be relied on in this forum
1) if the regulation is more sophisticated, it will be invested in several fields
2) the manager also always wants to release all his accounts to someone who can be relied on in this forum
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I think the team should keep our token. because bounty managers are not good. Sometimes they keep the project token, they will run away and no one will be able to find them.1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
and project owners will not let this happen. After completing the campaign, they will get bonuses and bounty hunters will be paid later.
For your question above, I personally prefer your first question, because if the gift manager holds a coin, there will be no fraudulent fraudulent projects out there, because the token they promised for the prize has been held by the manager. But they also have to be smart in choosing managers so that they are not lied to by the manager, by bringing the tokens they give.
I aggressive with you. Bounty managers like bountyhive are reputed and are very professional in their handling or bounty payment. However, some managers are very dishonest and don't pay bounty participants. I've had some issues on this before and I wonder why did they do that. Some don't pay even after 5 months of bounty and the tokens have been transferred to them.
sometimes its not the managers fault but its the owner . maybe because they have not reach thier qouta and they suspend the project but if ever they have succesfully end the project and you still dont recive you rewards this should be the fault of the manager because he maybe a scammer . reputable managers can also end on scamming . i have seen alot of them here before but dont worry because they will be punished by mods and admins here .they can be kicked out and will recieve a negative trust so that they cant scam again .
If it's from your options then I'd opt for the first one, but that one comes along with many questions as well.
Personally, I'd wish that all bounty should be paid to a reliable escrow and then the tokens get released after the end of the bounty. Because the bounty hunter may also run away but a registered escrow has a lesser likelihood of doing that.
Personally, I'd wish that all bounty should be paid to a reliable escrow and then the tokens get released after the end of the bounty. Because the bounty hunter may also run away but a registered escrow has a lesser likelihood of doing that.
For your question above, I personally prefer your first question, because if the gift manager holds a coin, there will be no fraudulent fraudulent projects out there, because the token they promised for the prize has been held by the manager. But they also have to be smart in choosing managers so that they are not lied to by the manager, by bringing the tokens they give.
I aggressive with you. Bounty managers like bountyhive are reputed and are very professional in their handling or bounty payment. However, some managers are very dishonest and don't pay bounty participants. I've had some issues on this before and I wonder why did they do that. Some don't pay even after 5 months of bounty and the tokens have been transferred to them.
There were a lot of bounty managers, but now there aren't too much good bounties, so I don't pay attention to bounty manager leading project.
Also it is common when new ICO use their own team to lead bounty
Also it is common when new ICO use their own team to lead bounty
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I hope the first selection is more attractive for everyone. Because, although in the title it is written 3 weeks after the bounty is completed, it is not acceptable for distrubiting to take 2-3 months or more time. Already waiting will not add more value. 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I think it does not matter if you participate in those projects that are reputable bounty managers. But if you have joined a project with a Manager unknown to you before, it is better to have tokens with him, not with the team.
Better those bounty managers who have the tokens of the project and then immediately distribute them to the bounty hunter. It is safer I believe.
There are particular managers I work with and as for those I work with, I do not mind if they pay by themselves, because I trust them.
There are now new managers allover, but their integrity has not yet been tested. For those type of managers, I might prefer that the team do the distribution.
There are now new managers allover, but their integrity has not yet been tested. For those type of managers, I might prefer that the team do the distribution.
Jump to: