Topic: Question about Bounty managers - page 5. (Read 698 times)
Of course I will choose and prefer the first choice (number 1). If the bounty manager is in control of the token in the bounty, of course the bounty participants are a little more calm. For reasons, there are no rules that change when counting is completed in a spreadsheet. Participants will be more calm in doing all their work assignments.
I like the first choice actually, but I have a bad experience with that because the bounty manager actually takes part in the participants' rewards. but I know that not all bounty managers do the same thing, for the second choice it is often done only if the team refuses to distribute bounty participants' rewards and the bounty manager cannot do anything.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I will go for the first choice where the bounty managers should be the ones to hold the tokens and distribute them after bounties but this is very unlikely to happen because some bounty managers might not be trusted1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I've joined a lot of bounties in the past, but I still prefer the #1 statement based on my experience because those bounties where the team will distribute the rewards later, those are the projects that I've got no rewards.
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 657
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
With a lot of project owners changing rules and regulations or total token allocated for bounty campaign. I bounty managers holding the coin or token allocated for bounty campaign will be the best for this will make bounty hunters feel more save and go after reputable bounty manager bounties. 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I prefer the first statement, as long as it is trustworthy and does not harm the bounty hunters,
the advantage is that we will quickly get our rewards from each of our jobs.
the advantage is that we will quickly get our rewards from each of our jobs.
I prefer the first option like the Bounty hive does, because they are the one es-crowing the tokens after the bounty is over you surely gets your allocated stakes at the right time with no delay. even the tokens has not list on any exchange yet you can still get your hard earn tokens. unlike the second option sometimes they will surprise you with the KYC procedure which is so damn brutal for bounty participants.
I have seen that so many times on so many bounty campaigns, the devs change the rules, from no KYC to KYC, bounty manager will never do that because it harms his reputation and no bounty hunters will trust projects that he is handling, so let the bounty manager hold the tokens, because he has a reputation to protect.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I prefer the first one
Quote
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants
provided that the bounty manager is highly trusted here in Bitcointalk I have been into a lot of campaigns and some bounty manager also suffers the same fate every time there are delays in bounty distribution
trusted bounty managers want his campaign to go smoothly and all participants to receive his share because a successful bounty distribution is his recommendation for another project.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I will go for the first choice where the bounty managers should be the ones to hold the tokens and distribute them after bounties but this is very unlikely to happen because some bounty managers might not be trusted 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
for me it is equally important that they are professionals like they demand participants to be professional.
and another important one is legit.
and another important one is legit.
Most would definitely vote for bounty manager's holding the tokens but I would prefer having an escrow instead. Keep in mind also that there are some who do not want the added responsibility holding.
Whether you choose the first or second option, both have advantages and disadvantages. Those advantages and disadvantages mainly come from honesty of bounty manager or project team. It doesn't matter if both manager and team are honest and vice versa if one party is dishonest. From point of view of a bounty doer, I prefer the first option based on the fact that bounty manager's reputation can be evaluated through time. Whereas, project teams' are not that easy to evaluate.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
Wouldn't the first option be better? This way, if the bounty manager is someone trusted, there is high chance you guys won't get scammed. If the second option is taken, there might be a probability that the bounty managers may refuse to pay the bounty rewards and run away. Either way, if the project is a scam, there is no way the tokens will have any value and you will have just wasted your time. 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I believe if all bounty hunter will choose number one.
Because if BM hold that bounty payment, no delay distribution and distribution will have fast finish.
The big problem of bounty hunter is delay of distribution and we don't know when it will happen.
Because if BM hold that bounty payment, no delay distribution and distribution will have fast finish.
The big problem of bounty hunter is delay of distribution and we don't know when it will happen.
As per info on the web many ICO projects are scam so its not a wise choice to allow the project teams to do the distribution and I believe that should be the work of a bounty manager
I choose number 1, namely managers who share with bounty participants. I think that all managers want every project they manage to succeed and can pay on time. It can also happen otherwise because of one thing that cannot be explained
But now, the bounty stopped to give the fruits and revenues,it actually is gone,and many projects are now just not worth it or anything,it's the projects that were done on the bounty,many even fell from prices ISO in x 100 or more times,so imagine to make x 100 it should be 10000% percent the token to grow,here's to many, many projects upali sorry
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
i think number one is the best, but in this case it would be better for funds to be stored in trusted escrow to be only to ensure security. but as long as the project has gained a good reputation by the community and the manager also has a good reputation, i think they are more understanding in this matter and i'm not too concerned about it because they can certainly manage the campaign well
I thought that the normal model is that bounty managers are sending the rewarding sheet to the team to make distribution. But I have met both cases, where team members refused to distribute tokens and bounty manager scammed everyone.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I don't care who is hold tokens. Although BM has hold but DEV scam, tokens is still not valid. The allocation of tokens at any reasonable time was carefully calculated by DEV. 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
Jump to: