Pages:
Author

Topic: Question about Bounty managers - page 4. (Read 698 times)

member
Activity: 281
Merit: 18
Arabs Bitcoin CEO
June 21, 2019, 07:01:24 PM
#57
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

The second option due to the fact that the task of the bounty manager is to calculate and assign rewards to bounty hunters then submit spreadsheet  to the teams for distribution. some time token is not ready to be distributed by the time of bounty ended, but the manager should keep in contact with hunters and team to ensure distribution.   
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 104
June 21, 2019, 06:38:14 PM
#56
I choose both because showing spreadsheet in all participants is very important things for the transparency to ensure no discrepancy.
Hodling token or coins of manager are one of the most factor that need to considered and also popularity as manager herein bitcointalk.
hero member
Activity: 2730
Merit: 632
June 21, 2019, 06:36:25 PM
#55
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
I do prefer on this way yet you can somehow assure that participants would be paid up but well its still no an assurance
yet we wont know if the manager itself would ran away with the funds that's why its important to stick into reputable managers.

2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
Even bounty managers cant assure if he himself would be paid up after the bounty.This do depends on their agreement on the first place.
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 255
June 21, 2019, 06:32:46 PM
#54
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
But not all bounty managers do that because most projects do their own distribution

2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
For this, all bounty managers must do it
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 260
June 21, 2019, 06:32:20 PM
#53
It was not good idea if the bounty manager will hold the bounty reward. Must better to the team will be one distributing on it because they are the one open the project. The bounty manager only only was the one to put some stake in the spreadsheet to pass to a team if the spreads are done.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 335
#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE
June 21, 2019, 06:30:00 PM
#52
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.


This is a major issue facing bounty hunters when it comes to receiving reward at the end of the bounty campaign. Both options had its own pros and cons but I would prefer to go with the second option where the spreadsheet will be delivered to the team. Some bounty mangers are cunning in character, who will even prefer to have his way if possible when it comes to distribution of rewards.
only trusted bounty manager that could on first option.maybe yahoo, hhampuz and other trusted by many developers team to distributed bounty reward.or atleast coins/token hold by escrow, so it will has certainity that reward will distributed soon after bounty finish.
legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1047
June 21, 2019, 06:27:16 PM
#51
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.



I'm ok bounty managers managing the token distribution, bounty managers wants to make the project finish and distribute the token so they will gain trust from investors, bounty managers are nothing if they will not gain support from bounty hunters, their job defends on how hunters reacts to their reputation.
member
Activity: 566
Merit: 10
June 21, 2019, 06:22:32 PM
#50
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.


This is a major issue facing bounty hunters when it comes to receiving reward at the end of the bounty campaign. Both options had its own pros and cons but I would prefer to go with the second option where the spreadsheet will be delivered to the team. Some bounty mangers are cunning in character, who will even prefer to have his way if possible when it comes to distribution of rewards.
full member
Activity: 432
Merit: 100
June 21, 2019, 05:25:22 PM
#49
I prefer the tean does the distribution. Most of the bounty managers use dubious means to get more tokens especially when they see the project has a great potential.
sr. member
Activity: 641
Merit: 253
▰▰▰ Global Cryptocurrency Paymen
June 21, 2019, 04:46:42 PM
#48
Though most of the people will prefer the first one, but that is not possible for the most bounty managers. Because only highly reputed bounty managers like yahoo or Hhampuz can get the bounty tokens before the campaign ends! Otherwise, maximum bounty managers got their payment in token and they don't have control in payment, only the team does!
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 251
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
June 21, 2019, 03:54:57 PM
#47
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.


I prefer the first choice rather than the second, Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants , but until now this has never happened, I hope that in the future this will become a reality
member
Activity: 742
Merit: 10
June 21, 2019, 03:54:40 PM
#46
I would prefer the first one.. it should be like that.. bounty managers should demand the rewards or escrow it in one wallet for security..For the dev team, they should check the background of the BM if he/she is trust-worthy
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 14
June 21, 2019, 03:45:05 PM
#45
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.


The first option should be better or even the use of escrow for bounty Payment. Most times the project reduce payment at the end of the day but if they hand it over to the managers it won't reduce.
member
Activity: 572
Merit: 10
June 21, 2019, 03:21:28 PM
#44
I think the first option would be the most ideal. Because it often happens that bounty the managers, too, are deceived by the project team, but if they would have tokens at once, the bounty would be paid more. I think so.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1280
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
June 21, 2019, 03:17:10 PM
#43
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.



I prefer to have an escrow.  Though in some point the bounty manager would be an escrow but that would be a conflict of interest because both party, the manager and the owner are involved in such campaign.  It would be best if there is a third party to hold the bounty reward.

There are several cases wherein the bounty manager failed to distribute the token to their paricipant.  Aside from that, there are also cases wherein some manager manipulate stakes in their own favor such as calculating stakes of disqualified participants and divide the stake together with the stake of these dq'ed account.
full member
Activity: 566
Merit: 107
June 21, 2019, 03:09:49 PM
#42
of course I chose the first one because the reward obtained was certain, escaping from tokens or the coins obtained had value and also if all the bounty managers could do that might be a good thing
member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 68
June 21, 2019, 02:43:56 PM
#41
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.



I believe it is better if the tokens are kept with the bounty managers
It makes it easy and secure and bounty managers will send spreadsheet to the team for audits

Sending rewards by the team is not bad either; as Long as a mutual agreement is reached
member
Activity: 882
Merit: 17
June 21, 2019, 02:14:24 PM
#40
hunters deserved to be paid. you question is baseless. whether the team paid or not. what we are concern about is our pay for work done. nothing  more to say here. most times the payment delay are as a result of lazy BMs, also bounty managers that are selfish.
sr. member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 267
June 21, 2019, 01:40:07 PM
#39
They have bounty manager who held the token which is more safety because they will give the reward of the participants and there's no doubt about that. But the team of the project will choose best bounty manager who have experienced and trusted about managing a campaign and for sure everythinh will be fine . Paritipants will don't have any doubt to join to bounty campaign only they problems is when the token listed.
sr. member
Activity: 1479
Merit: 273
Seabet.io | Crypto-Casino
June 21, 2019, 01:22:54 PM
#38
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.


If must pick, maybe a lot of people here include me will pick first one, but as bounty manager i know it is really a lot of job and maybe developer itself will think twice to give their coins to bounty manager to pay the reward for bounty participants, and fees from that bounty manager will be higher than usual.
Pages:
Jump to: