Topic: Question about Bounty managers - page 3. (Read 698 times)
I guess its a case to case basis and both options are okay with me since bounty campaigns mostly depends on the trustworthiness of both the bounty managers and the core team respectively. I guess the real challenge here is to select a good project and a dependable bounty managers altogether to ensure a fruitful bounty campaign.
It is better for us if bounty manager holds the fund. But this bounty manager should be trusted and responsible. If not, then we have to believe ICO team that they will appreciate the hard work.
I have been experiencing that bounty managers are blamed for everything that they are not responsible for and that is not under their control. I think their duty is to moderate bounty campaign only, but not manage the whole management of a project. They are given responsibility to manage bounty campaigns and submit the report to the management team. So second is right.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I would prefer the number 2, we can't trust the bounty managers with a big money since they can do dark and just scam, they don't have much reputation to protect compared to the project itself.
If the team project will hold, sure it will affect their reputation if they will not pay and that's bad for the future of the project.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I choose the first choice. As a bounty campaign manager, it should be the one who manages everything related to the bounty campaign, including the distribution of tokens or coins offered as gifts. If the distribution of tokens is the authority of the team, I am afraid that the project will eventually cheat or scam. If the token or coin is already in the hands of the bounty manager, we have ensured that the tokens that are promoted are indeed real and can be traded.
If we want point 1, usually that is the manager or managing the bounty is from the project team itself. So coins or tokens are certainly in their own hands because they are the managers. If we want point 2 it's like a manager who has his own management or someone else. Become them after completing their work. After that, they only send spreadsheets to the team to distribute to all participants.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
Well, I am much preferred in the first one dude. But in most of the time happened in every project campaign whether IEO, ICO or STO was the second one. And I think having a high green trust is an advantage for the managers to join in because they have a good reputation here in the forum in my own opinion only.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I prefer number one because i don't beliave team very much. Many team keep their token and distribution will be delay. Bounty manager has their image. so, i beliave bounty manager 1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
I want to be fair to the participants, because sometimes when the bounty is completed, the manager can only support but cannot do anything else. But putting the manager to keep the token will probably happen a lot of trouble like scam bounty hunter
Because most bounty managers cannot make their own decisions. therefore they cannot hold allocations for bounty participants. Because the bounty manager can only manage and after the final spreadsheet is sent to the project team for distribution.
Its vice versa,sometimes bounty managers are the ones that will cheat bounty hunters after getting the whole token from the project's team and sometimes giving the bounty spreadsheet back to the tram is a bad idea because they might decide not to distribute the token anymore
I will also go with the majority here, it will much safer to know that the reward are already in possession of the bounty manager especially if that manager happens to be a trusted one, but in some few cases even some bm can also deceive hunters so this largely depend on trust of the project team or the bounty manager.
For me I prefer it when the bounty manager holds the coin, but it is also based on if the bounty manager is trusted or not. The problem with bounty managers submitting spreadsheet is that the bounty pool will eventually be changed when they see how much they are about to pay some people..
I guess both have disadvantages and advantages, if the bounty manager is greedy then you can expect the reward not to be accurate if the manager is the one in charge of the distribution but if the team is the one in charge then you can expect a delay in the distribution of the rewards as a disadvantage, still i prefer the first option.
Second is being practiced and it is correct I think. I am sorry if my opinion is different. Bounty manager is like us, bounty hunters, who work for a project. Bounty manager works for a project, and act on their direction. And it is always in the hands of project owners to take a decision in distributing tokens in reward. So project owners have the last call.
for me the second one is very relevant. The bounty manager can't hold coins / tokens. The bounty manager function is to calculate the stake obtained by the participant and send it to the team.
I prefer managers to be coin holders to distribute, because when the bounty managers give assignments to the project team they will make continuous delays, and that benefits them but harms us as a bounty hunter.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
After the LIKER locking the thread indefinitely, there are no safe side developers and bounty managers can make things miserable for bounty hunters, but I like bounty manager to handle the token for distribution because they want to do it fast and they are easy to contact than the developers.
To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.
It would be nice for campaign managers to distribute tokens for bounty participants. If we make a complaint it's also easy, because it's part of his job. If the team distributes tokens, of course they are very difficult to deal with bounty problems, because many investors also have to send their tokens. But, how about campaign managers who are not trusted?That means goodbye.
Although I prefer that the bounty managers should hold the tokens, but such manager must be very honest and trustworthy, because there are some managers that will not want to pay bounty hunters.
There are several platforms that receive the tokens first before agreeing to manage the project and with such, bounty managers might not have issue with their participants.
There are several platforms that receive the tokens first before agreeing to manage the project and with such, bounty managers might not have issue with their participants.
Jump to: